Suppr超能文献

三种不同的短间隔皮质内抑制方法在肌萎缩侧索硬化症的早期诊断中的应用。

Three different short-interval intracortical inhibition methods in early diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2023 Feb;24(1-2):139-147. doi: 10.1080/21678421.2022.2101926. Epub 2022 Jul 27.

Abstract

To compare the utility of conventional amplitude measurements of short-interval intracortical inhibition (A-SICI) with two threshold-tracking (T-SICI) methods, as aids to early diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The new parallel threshold-tracking method (T-SICIp) was compared with the previously used serial tracking method (T-SICIs). 112 consecutive patients referred with the suspicion of ALS and 40 healthy controls were prospectively included. Based on clinical follow-up, patients were divided into 67 patients with motor neuron disease (MND) comprising progressive muscular atrophy (PMA) as well as ALS, and 45 patient controls. SICI was recorded from first dorsal interosseus muscle using the three different protocols. MND patients had significantly reduced T-SICIp, T-SICIs and A-SICI, compared with healthy controls and patient controls, while healthy and patient controls were similar. Paradoxically, T-SICIp was least affected in MND patients with the most upper motor neuron (UMN) signs (Spearman  = 0.537,  < 0.0001) whereas there was no correlation for T-SICIs or A-SICI. T-SICIp also provided the best discrimination between patient controls and MND as determined by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. For patients with no UMN signs, area under ROC curve for 2-3ms inter-stimulus intervals was 0.931 for T-SICIp, 0.771 for T-SICIs and 0.786 for A-SICI. SICI is a sensitive measure for detection of cortical involvement in ALS patients. T-SICIp has higher sensitivity and specificity than T-SICIs and A-SICI, particularly in patients without any upper motor neuron signs.

摘要

为了比较传统的短间隔皮质内抑制幅度测量(A-SICI)与两种阈值跟踪(T-SICI)方法的效用,以辅助肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)的早期诊断。将新的平行阈值跟踪方法(T-SICIp)与以前使用的序列跟踪方法(T-SICIs)进行了比较。 112 例连续疑似 ALS 患者和 40 例健康对照者被前瞻性纳入。根据临床随访,患者被分为 67 例运动神经元病(MND)患者,包括进行性肌肉萎缩(PMA)和 ALS,以及 45 例患者对照组。使用三种不同方案记录第一背侧骨间肌的 SICI。 MND 患者的 T-SICIp、T-SICIs 和 A-SICI 明显低于健康对照组和患者对照组,而健康对照组和患者对照组相似。奇怪的是,T-SICIp 在 UMN 体征最明显的 MND 患者中受影响最小(Spearman  = 0.537,  < 0.0001),而 T-SICIs 或 A-SICI 则没有相关性。T-SICIp 还通过接收器操作特征(ROC)曲线为患者对照组和 MND 之间的最佳区分提供了依据。对于没有 UMN 体征的患者,2-3ms 刺激间隔的 ROC 曲线下面积为 T-SICIp 为 0.931,T-SICIs 为 0.771,A-SICI 为 0.786。 SICI 是检测 ALS 患者皮质受累的敏感指标。T-SICIp 比 T-SICIs 和 A-SICI 具有更高的灵敏度和特异性,尤其是在没有任何上运动神经元体征的患者中。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验