Suppr超能文献

在使用环境 DNA metabarcoding 监测陆地生态恢复时需要考虑的关键因素。

Key factors to consider in the use of environmental DNA metabarcoding to monitor terrestrial ecological restoration.

机构信息

ARC Centre for Mine Site Restoration, School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, GPP Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6102, Australia; Trace and Environmental DNA Laboratory, School of Life and Molecular Sciences, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6102, Australia.

Trace and Environmental DNA Laboratory, School of Life and Molecular Sciences, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6102, Australia; Institute of Environmental Science and Research (ESR), Kenepuru, Porirua 5022, New Zealand.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2022 Nov 20;848:157617. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157617. Epub 2022 Jul 25.

Abstract

Ecological restoration of terrestrial environments is a globally important process to combat the loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Holistic monitoring of restored biota and active management of restoration is necessary to improve restoration processes and outcomes, and provide evidence to stakeholders that targets are being achieved. Increasingly, environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is used as a restoration monitoring tool because it is able to generate biodiversity data rapidly, accurately, non-destructively, and reliably, on a wide breadth of organisms from soil microbes to mammals. The overall objective of this review is to discuss the key factors to consider in the use of environmental DNA for monitoring of restored terrestrial ecosystems, hopefully improving monitoring, and ultimately, restoration outcomes. We identified that the majority of eDNA based studies of ecosystem restoration are currently conducted in Europe, North America, and Australia, and that almost half of total studies were published in 2021-22. Soil was the most popular sample substrate, soil microbial communities the most targeted taxa, and forests the most studied ecosystem. We suggest there is no 'one size fits all' approach to restoration monitoring using eDNA, and discuss survey design. Factors to consider include substrate selection, sample collection and storage, assay selection, and data interpretation, all of which require careful planning to obtain reliable, and accurate information that can be used for restoration monitoring and decision making. We explore future directions for research and argue that eDNA metabarcoding can be a useful tool in the restoration monitoring 'toolkit', but requires informed application and greater accessibility to data by a wide spectrum of stakeholders.

摘要

陆地环境的生态恢复是应对生物多样性和生态系统服务丧失的全球重要过程。全面监测恢复的生物群和积极管理恢复是必要的,以改善恢复过程和结果,并向利益相关者提供正在实现目标的证据。越来越多的环境 DNA (eDNA) 代谢组学被用作恢复监测工具,因为它能够快速、准确、非破坏性和可靠地生成生物多样性数据,涵盖从土壤微生物到哺乳动物的广泛生物。本综述的总体目标是讨论在监测恢复的陆地生态系统中使用环境 DNA 时需要考虑的关键因素,希望能改善监测,最终改善恢复结果。我们发现,目前对生态系统恢复的大多数基于 eDNA 的研究都在欧洲、北美和澳大利亚进行,而在 2021-22 年期间发表的研究几乎占总数的一半。土壤是最受欢迎的样本基质,土壤微生物群落是最受关注的分类群,森林是最受研究的生态系统。我们认为,使用 eDNA 进行恢复监测没有“一刀切”的方法,并讨论了调查设计。需要考虑的因素包括基质选择、样本采集和储存、检测方法选择以及数据解释,所有这些都需要精心规划,以获取可用于恢复监测和决策的可靠和准确信息。我们探讨了未来的研究方向,并认为 eDNA 代谢组学可以成为恢复监测“工具包”中的有用工具,但需要广泛的利益相关者知情应用和更方便地获取数据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验