From the Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, N.L. (Benesch, Mathieson, Pace).
Can J Surg. 2022 Jul 28;65(4):E485-E486. doi: 10.1503/cjs.013821. Print 2022 Jul-Aug.
Among surgical residents, research is often perceived as a check-mark exercise. Focus then turns to studying for exams and honing skills for independent practice. While some residents are passionate about research and enroll in other formalized training, pragmatists argue that not every surgeon should engage in research at this level. However, no resident should view research as a one-and-done activity. Rather, research should be viewed as an exercise to improve practice, share gaps in knowledge, collaborate, and empower others to formally study and implement change. The skills acquired during research experiences, at minimum, have value in improving the trainee's literature literacy, which in turn serves as a foundational element of continuing medical education. A culture supportive of scientific discovery, facilitated by both faculty and peer-to-peer mentorship, will result in better collaborative efforts and lead to improved knowledge generation and resident research satisfaction.
在外科住院医师中,研究通常被视为一种勾选练习。然后,他们的注意力转向为考试而学习和磨练独立实践的技能。虽然有些住院医师对研究充满热情并参加其他形式的培训,但实用主义者认为并非每个外科医生都应该在这个层面上从事研究。然而,住院医师不应将研究视为一次性活动。相反,研究应该被视为一种提高实践水平、填补知识空白、协作以及赋予他人正式研究和实施变革的能力的练习。在研究经验中获得的技能至少具有提高受训者文献素养的价值,而文献素养反过来又是继续医学教育的基础要素。一种由教员和同行指导促进的支持科学发现的文化将导致更好的协作努力,并导致更好的知识生成和住院医师研究满意度。