Department of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Medicine, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.
Department of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Am J Cardiol. 2022 Sep 15;179:18-21. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.06.006. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
Absolute coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores and CAC percentiles can identify different patient groups, which could be confusing in clinical practice. We aimed to create a simple "rule of thumb" for identifying the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association endorsed 75th CAC percentile based on age, gender, and the absolute CAC score. Using the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, we calculated the age and gender-specific percent likelihood that a guideline-based absolute CAC score group (1 to 100, 100 to 300, >300) will place a patient above the 75th percentile. Also, we derived gender-specific age cutoffs by which 95% of participants with any (>0), moderate (≥100), or severe (≥300) CAC score would be over the 75th percentile. We repeated the analysis using the 90th percentile threshold and also conducted sensitivity analyses stratified by race. Any CAC >0 places 95% of women younger than 60 years and over 90% of men younger than 50 years over the 75th percentile. Moderate absolute CAC scores (>100) place nearly all men <60 years and all women <70 years over the 75th percentile. Confirmatory analysis for age cutoffs was consistent with primary analysis, with cutoffs of 48 years for men and 59 years for women indicating a 95% likelihood that any CAC would place patients over the 75th percentile. In conclusion, our study provides a simple rule of thumb (men <50 years and women <60 years with any CAC, men <60 years and women <70 years with CAC >100) for identifying CAC >75th percentile that might be readily adopted in clinical practice.
绝对冠状动脉钙(CAC)评分和 CAC 百分位数可识别不同的患者群体,这在临床实践中可能会令人困惑。我们旨在制定一个简单的“经验法则”,根据年龄、性别和绝对 CAC 评分来识别美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会认可的 75 百分位 CAC 百分位数。使用多民族动脉粥样硬化研究,我们计算了基于指南的绝对 CAC 评分组(1 至 100、100 至 300、>300)中患者处于 75 百分位以上的年龄和性别特异性概率。此外,我们还得出了性别特异性年龄截止值,95%的任何(>0)、中度(≥100)或重度(≥300)CAC 评分的参与者将超过 75 百分位。我们使用 90 百分位阈值重复了分析,并按种族进行了敏感性分析。任何 CAC >0 使 95%的女性年龄小于 60 岁,90%的男性年龄小于 50 岁超过 75 百分位。中度绝对 CAC 评分(>100)使几乎所有男性年龄小于 60 岁和所有女性年龄小于 70 岁都超过 75 百分位。年龄截止值的确认性分析与主要分析一致,男性的截止值为 48 岁,女性的截止值为 59 岁,表示 95%的 CAC 患者将超过 75 百分位。总之,我们的研究提供了一个简单的经验法则(任何 CAC 的男性年龄小于 50 岁,女性年龄小于 60 岁,CAC >100 的男性年龄小于 60 岁,女性年龄小于 70 岁),用于识别 CAC >75 百分位,这可能在临床实践中容易采用。