Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Hunan Children's Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Int J Artif Organs. 2022 Dec;45(12):997-1005. doi: 10.1177/03913988221115447. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) modalities with regional sodium citrate anticoagulation (RCA) in children.
This retrospective study was conducted at the paediatric intensive care unit of Hunan Children's Hospital in China. Medical records of paediatric patients hospitalised for RCA-CRRT between April 2017 and March 2021 were reviewed. Patients received continuous venovenous haemodialysis, continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVH), or continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF).
Patients on continuous venovenous haemodialysis ( = 2) were excluded because of their small sample size. The remaining participants were divided into CVVH and CVVHDF groups; 80 patients received CRRT, with 40 and 62 sessions in the CVVH and CVVHDF groups, respectively. The filtre lifespan was longer in the CVVHDF group than in the CVVH group (median value [interquartile range]; 47 [15] hours vs. 35 [17.5] hours; = 0.029). Compared with the CVVHDF group, the hazard ratio for filtre lifespan in the CVVH group was 3.023 (95% confidence interval 1.820-5.023, < 0.001). There were no significant differences in ionised calcium levels of the circuits between the two groups at different time points ( < 0.05). Metabolic alkalosis, hyperlactataemia, hypocalcaemia, and hypercalcaemia occurred in both groups, with metabolic alkalosis being the most common complication. No patients in either group experienced sodium citrate accumulation or hypernatraemia. Inter-group differences in the incidence of these complications were not statistically significant ( > 0.05).
Our results suggest that CVVHDF is a better option for RCA-CRRT than CVVH.
评估局部枸橼酸钠抗凝(RCA)的连续肾脏替代疗法(CRRT)模式在儿童中的疗效和安全性。
本回顾性研究在中国湖南儿童医院儿科重症监护病房进行。回顾了 2017 年 4 月至 2021 年 3 月期间因 RCA-CRRT 住院的儿科患者的病历。患者接受连续静脉-静脉血液透析、连续静脉-静脉血液滤过(CVVH)或连续静脉-静脉血液透析滤过(CVVHDF)治疗。
由于样本量小,连续静脉-静脉血液透析( = 2)的患者被排除在外。其余参与者分为 CVVH 和 CVVHDF 组;80 名患者接受了 CRRT,CVVH 组和 CVVHDF 组分别有 40 次和 62 次治疗。CVVHDF 组的滤器寿命长于 CVVH 组(中位数[四分位距];47 [15]小时比 35 [17.5]小时; = 0.029)。与 CVVHDF 组相比,CVVH 组滤器寿命的风险比为 3.023(95%置信区间 1.820-5.023, < 0.001)。两组在不同时间点的回路离子钙水平无显著差异( < 0.05)。两组均出现代谢性碱中毒、高乳酸血症、低钙血症和高钙血症,其中代谢性碱中毒最常见。两组均无患者发生枸橼酸钠蓄积或高钠血症。这些并发症的发生率在两组之间无统计学差异( > 0.05)。
我们的结果表明,CVVHDF 是 RCA-CRRT 的一种更好选择,优于 CVVH。