Odlind B, Beermann B, Lindström B, Eriksson O
Ups J Med Sci. 1987;92(1):19-35. doi: 10.3109/03009738709178675.
Metolazone action was studied 1) in vitro on isolated operculum of Fundulus heteroclitus (active chloride transport) using an Ussing chamber (metolazone conc 500 microM) and in vivo 2) using the modified Sperber technique in the hen (metolazone infusion rate 0.75-1.2 micrograms/kg/min) and 3) in healthy volunteers using clearance techniques (metolazone infusion rate 10 mg/h). Metolazone reduced (p less than 0.05) short circuit current potential differences with 20% from average control values (p less than 0.05), while direct current resistance was unchanged. This is comparable to thiazide but much lower than loop diuretic effects. True tubular excretion fraction of metolazone before and after novobiocin (2.7 mumol/kg/min coinfusion averaged 14.1 and 4.5%, resp. (p less than 0.01; n = 8). Thus metolazone is partly eliminated by renal tubular secretion. However, the diuretic effect (sodium, chloride and potassium excretion)--and clearances of Cr51-EDTA and I125-Na-o-iodohippurate--were symmetrical, i.e. independent of metolazone urinary excretion rate, as previously shown for thiazides. Renal clearance of metolazone in healthy volunteers. (HPLC-method) averaged 173 +/- 20 ml/min (n = 8). Probenecid (1 g iv.) significantly reduced the renal clearance of metolazone to 33 +/- 7 ml/min and potassium excretion with maximum 30%, while diuretic and saluretic effects were significantly increased with maximum 30%. Thus, also in humans the diuretic effect of metolazone is not coupled to the urinary excretion rate of the drug, but suggests that its diuretic effect is elicited primarily from the peritubular side of the nephron. Probenecid apparently dissociates sodium from potassium excretion effects of metolazone. This implies a luminal, sodium-independent kaliuretic effect of the drug.
1)在体外,使用尤斯灌流小室(美托拉宗浓度为500微摩尔),对异育银汉鱼的离体鳃盖(主动氯化物转运)进行研究;2)在体内,使用改良的斯珀伯技术对母鸡进行研究(美托拉宗输注速率为0.75 - 1.2微克/千克/分钟);3)在健康志愿者中,使用清除技术进行研究(美托拉宗输注速率为10毫克/小时)。美托拉宗使短路电流电位差比平均对照值降低了20%(p < 0.05),而直流电阻未改变。这与噻嗪类药物相当,但远低于袢利尿剂的作用。新生霉素给药前后美托拉宗的真实肾小管排泄分数(共输注速率为2.7微摩尔/千克/分钟)分别平均为14.1%和4.5%(p < 0.01;n = 8)。因此,美托拉宗部分通过肾小管分泌消除。然而,利尿作用(钠、氯和钾排泄)以及51Cr - EDTA和125I - 邻碘马尿酸钠的清除率是对称的,即与美托拉宗的尿排泄速率无关,正如先前对噻嗪类药物所显示的那样。健康志愿者中美托拉宗的肾清除率(高效液相色谱法)平均为173 ± 20毫升/分钟(n = 8)。丙磺舒(静脉注射1克)显著降低美托拉宗的肾清除率至33 ± 7毫升/分钟,并使钾排泄最多降低30%,而利尿和促尿钠排泄作用最多显著增加30%。因此,在人类中,美托拉宗的利尿作用也与药物的尿排泄速率无关,而是表明其利尿作用主要从肾单位的肾小管周围侧引发。丙磺舒明显使美托拉宗的钠排泄作用与钾排泄作用分离。这意味着该药物具有管腔性、不依赖钠的促钾利尿作用。