Department of Pharmacy, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Infection Control and Prevention, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 29;17(7):e0271812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271812. eCollection 2022.
Prospective audit and feedback (PAF) is considered an effective procedure for appropriate antibiotic use. However, its effect on the time to de-escalation is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the effect of daily PAF implementation, focusing on the time to de-escalation of anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) agents as an outcome measure. To this end, a single-center, retrospective, quasi-experimental study including patients treated with intravenous anti-MRSA agents during pre-PAF (April 1, 2014 to March 31, 2015) and post-PAF (April 1, 2015 to March 31, 2016) periods was conducted. The time to de-escalation was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to assess the effect of daily PAF implementation on the time to de-escalation. Interrupted time series analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between daily PAF implementation and anti-MRSA agent utilization data converted to defined daily dose (DDD) and days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 patient days. The median time to de-escalation was significantly shorter in the post-PAF period than in the pre-PAF period (6 days vs. 7 days, P < 0.001). According to multivariate analysis, PAF implementation was independently associated with a shorter time to de-escalation (hazard ratio [HR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02 to 1.35). There were no significant differences in hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and length of stay between the two periods. Interrupted time series analysis showed significant reductions in the trends of DDD (trend change, -0.65; 95% CI, -1.20 to -0.11) and DOT (trend change, -0.74; 95% CI, -1.33 to -0.15) between the pre-PAF and post-PAF periods. Daily PAF implementation for patients treated with intravenous anti-MRSA agents led to a shorter time to de-escalation and lower consumption of anti-MRSA agents without worsening the clinically important outcomes.
前瞻性审核和反馈 (PAF) 被认为是一种促进合理使用抗生素的有效手段。然而,其对抗 MRSA 药物降级时间的影响尚不清楚。我们旨在评估每日 PAF 实施的效果,重点关注作为结果测量的抗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌 (MRSA) 药物降级时间。为此,进行了一项单中心、回顾性、准实验研究,包括在 PAF 前(2014 年 4 月 1 日至 2015 年 3 月 31 日)和 PAF 后(2015 年 4 月 1 日至 2016 年 3 月 31 日)期间接受静脉注射抗-MRSA 药物治疗的患者。使用 Kaplan-Meier 法估计降级时间,并使用 Cox 比例风险分析评估每日 PAF 实施对降级时间的影响。中断时间序列分析用于评估每日 PAF 实施与抗-MRSA 药物利用数据(转换为定义日剂量(DDD)和每 1000 个患者日的治疗天数(DOT))之间的关系。与 PAF 前相比,PAF 后降级时间显著缩短(6 天与 7 天,P<0.001)。根据多变量分析,PAF 实施与降级时间缩短独立相关(风险比 [HR],1.18;95%置信区间 [CI],1.02 至 1.35)。两个时期的医院死亡率、30 天死亡率和住院时间无显著差异。中断时间序列分析显示 DDD(趋势变化,-0.65;95%CI,-1.20 至-0.11)和 DOT(趋势变化,-0.74;95%CI,-1.33 至-0.15)的趋势均有显著下降。每日 PAF 实施使接受静脉注射抗-MRSA 药物治疗的患者的降级时间缩短,抗-MRSA 药物的使用量降低,且未恶化临床重要结局。