• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

干预措施克服专科诊所患者流感疫苗犹豫的效果。

Effectiveness of an intervention to overcome influenza vaccine hesitancy in specialty clinic patients.

机构信息

Department of Health Behavior and Health Systems, School of Public Health, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, United States.

Department of Internal Medicine, Texas College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, United States.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jul 29;101(30):e29786. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029786.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000029786
PMID:35905271
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9333474/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Individuals on immunosuppressive therapies experience greater morbidity and mortality due to vaccine-preventable illnesses, but there are low rates of adherence to immunization guidelines within this population.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of clinician-led education, patient-centered dialogue, and immediately available immunization on influenza vaccination uptake in patients taking immunosuppressive therapies.

METHOD

We used a controlled before-and-after quasi-experimental design to evaluate our quality improvement intervention occurring from September 2019 to March 2020, with follow-up through July 2020. The study included 2 dermatology practices wherein nursing staff offered influenza vaccination during patient rooming (standard care). Within each practice, clinicians either implemented the intervention or provided only standard care. Patients received the intervention or standard care depending on the clinician they visited. Patients seen at the 2 clinics during the intervention period were included in analyses if they were taking or newly prescribed immunosuppressant medication at the time of their visit. We examined influenza immunization status for 3 flu seasons: 2017-2018 (preintervention), 2018-2019 (preintervention), and 2019-2020 (intervention).

INTERVENTION

Immunosuppressed patients initially declining an influenza vaccine were provided dermatologist-led education on the benefits of immunization. Dermatologists explored and addressed individual patients' immunization concerns. Influenza vaccination was then offered immediately postdialogue.

RESULTS

Analyses included 201 dermatology patients who were prescribed or currently taking immunosuppressive medication (intervention group [72.6%], comparison group [27.4%]). During the intervention period, 91.1% of the intervention group received influenza vaccination compared to 56.4% of the comparison group. Vaccination trends from 2018-2019 (preintervention) to 2019-2020 (intervention) differed significantly between groups (χ2 = 22.92, P < .001), with greater improvement in the intervention group. In 2019-2020, influenza vaccination was more likely in the intervention group relative to the comparison group (odds ratio: 16.22, 95% confidence interval: 5.55-47.38). In the subset of patients that had never received an influenza vaccine, influenza immunization in 2019-2020 was more common in the intervention group (75.8%, 25/33) relative to the comparison group (13.3%, 2/15, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The intervention successfully addressed vaccine hesitancy and improved influenza immunization rates in an immunosuppressed population receiving care from a specialty clinic. Implementing a similar model across specialty clinics may improve vaccination rates for influenza, coronavirus disease 2019, and other vaccine-preventable illnesses in other populations.

摘要

背景

接受免疫抑制治疗的个体因可通过疫苗预防的疾病而导致发病率和死亡率更高,但该人群对免疫接种指南的依从性较低。

目的

确定临床医生主导的教育、以患者为中心的对话和立即提供免疫接种对接受免疫抑制治疗的患者进行流感疫苗接种的效果。

方法

我们使用了对照前后的准实验设计来评估我们的质量改进干预措施,该干预措施于 2019 年 9 月至 2020 年 3 月进行,随访至 2020 年 7 月。该研究包括 2 个皮肤科诊所,在患者入诊室期间,护理人员提供流感疫苗接种(标准护理)。在每个诊所中,临床医生要么实施干预措施,要么仅提供标准护理。患者根据就诊的临床医生接受干预或标准护理。在干预期间在这 2 个诊所就诊且在就诊时正在服用或新开具免疫抑制剂的患者,如果在这 3 个流感季节中接受了流感免疫接种,则被纳入分析:2017-2018 年(干预前)、2018-2019 年(干预前)和 2019-2020 年(干预)。

干预

最初拒绝接种流感疫苗的免疫抑制患者接受皮肤科医生主导的免疫益处教育。皮肤科医生探讨并解决了个别患者的免疫接种问题。然后在对话后立即提供流感疫苗接种。

结果

分析纳入了 201 名正在服用或正在服用免疫抑制药物的皮肤科患者(干预组[72.6%],对照组[27.4%])。在干预期间,干预组中有 91.1%的患者接种了流感疫苗,而对照组中只有 56.4%的患者接种了流感疫苗。从 2018-2019 年(干预前)到 2019-2020 年(干预),组间的疫苗接种趋势差异显著(χ2 = 22.92,P <.001),干预组的改善更为明显。在 2019-2020 年,干预组接种流感疫苗的可能性高于对照组(优势比:16.22,95%置信区间:5.55-47.38)。在从未接种过流感疫苗的患者亚组中,干预组在 2019-2020 年接种流感疫苗的比例(75.8%,25/33)明显高于对照组(13.3%,2/15,P <.001)。

结论

该干预措施成功地解决了疫苗犹豫问题,并提高了接受专科诊所护理的免疫抑制人群的流感免疫接种率。在其他专科诊所实施类似模式可能会提高其他人群对流感、COVID-19 和其他可通过疫苗预防的疾病的疫苗接种率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3685/9333474/f8421d36f96d/medi-101-e29786-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3685/9333474/f8421d36f96d/medi-101-e29786-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3685/9333474/f8421d36f96d/medi-101-e29786-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of an intervention to overcome influenza vaccine hesitancy in specialty clinic patients.干预措施克服专科诊所患者流感疫苗犹豫的效果。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jul 29;101(30):e29786. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029786.
2
Vaccine hesitancy among people with multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者中的疫苗犹豫。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021 Nov;56:103236. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103236. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
3
[Technical guidelines for seasonal influenza vaccination in China (2022-2023)].《中国季节性流感疫苗接种技术指南(2022—2023年)》
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Oct 6;56(10):1356-1386. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20220825-00840.
4
[Technical guidelines for seasonal influenza vaccination in China (2022-2023)].《中国季节性流感疫苗接种技术指南(2022—2023年)》
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Oct 10;43(10):1515-1544. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20220825-00734.
5
[Technical guidelines for seasonal influenza vaccination in China (2021-2022)].《中国季节性流感疫苗接种技术指南(2021—2022年)》
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Oct 10;42(10):1722-1749. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20210913-00732.
6
Protecting pregnant people & infants against influenza: A landscape review of influenza vaccine hesitancy during pregnancy and strategies for vaccine promotion.保护孕妇和婴儿免受流感侵害:妊娠期流感疫苗犹豫的现状综述及疫苗推广策略。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Dec 30;18(7):2156229. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2156229. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
7
Improving Influenza Vaccination Rates in an Underserved Primary Care Clinic Using a Simple Educational Tool.利用简单的教育工具提高服务不足的初级保健诊所的流感疫苗接种率。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2022;31(2):80-84. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000335.
8
Influenza Vaccination Quality Improvement as a Model for COVID-19 Prophylaxis.流感疫苗接种质量改进作为新冠病毒预防的一个范例
Cureus. 2021 Jan 7;13(1):e12549. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12549.
9
Maintenance of Increased Childhood Influenza Vaccination Rates 1 Year After an Intervention in Primary Care Practices.初级保健机构干预1年后儿童流感疫苗接种率持续上升的维持情况
Acad Pediatr. 2016 Jan-Feb;16(1):57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2015.03.010.
10
Effectiveness of a pay-it-forward intervention compared with user-paid vaccination to improve influenza vaccine uptake and community engagement among children and older adults in China: a quasi-experimental pragmatic trial.“先付后得”干预措施与用户付费接种疫苗相比,提高中国儿童和老年人流感疫苗接种率和社区参与度的效果:一项准实验性实用试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Oct;22(10):1484-1492. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00346-2. Epub 2022 Jul 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing HPV vaccine acceptance in immunosuppressed patient populations: a protocol for a systematic review.影响免疫抑制患者群体中HPV疫苗接种率的因素:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 14;15(9):e094224. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094224.
2
Vaccine hesitancy in an allergy and immunology clinic in an underserved community.服务欠缺社区的过敏与免疫诊所中的疫苗犹豫现象。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2025 Apr 17;4(3):100475. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2025.100475. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Patients with immune mediated inflammatory diseases are insufficiently protected against vaccine-preventable infections.
免疫介导的炎症性疾病患者在预防疫苗可预防感染方面保护不足。
Infection. 2025 Feb;53(1):317-327. doi: 10.1007/s15010-024-02373-z. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
4
Attitudes towards COVID Vaccine and Vaccine Hesitancy in Dermatology: A Narrative Review.皮肤病学中对新冠疫苗的态度及疫苗犹豫:一项叙述性综述
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Aug 15;11(8):1365. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11081365.