AGH University of Science and Technology, A. Mickiewicza Av. 30, 30-059, Krakow, Poland.
Institute of Meteorology and Water, Management - National Research Institute, Podleśna 61, 01-673, Warsaw, Poland.
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 29;12(1):13052. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17270-4.
Nitrogen and phosphorus budgeting is considered to be a key tool for policy makers and stakeholders when dealing with nutrient contamination issues, however no unified method has been employed in countries affected by this eutrophication problem. The current study offers a detailed insight into the estimations of nutrient loads and their distribution between different sources for a middle-sized agricultural catchment, with the use of two approaches: mass balance (static) and modelling (dynamic). Both methods revealed similar contributions of analysed nutrient sources, although the final estimates in the chosen calculation profile were divergent due to the various reasons related to the methods' specificity. The advantages and disadvantages of both approaches have been specified in our study, and a hybrid solution on a local and country wide scale has been proposed.
氮磷预算被认为是政策制定者和利益相关者在处理营养物污染问题时的关键工具,但在受到富营养化问题影响的国家中,并没有采用统一的方法。本研究详细深入地分析了中型农业流域中不同来源的养分负荷及其分布,使用了两种方法:质量平衡(静态)和模拟(动态)。这两种方法都揭示了分析的养分来源的相似贡献,尽管由于与方法特异性相关的各种原因,在所选择的计算方案中的最终估算值有所不同。本研究还具体说明了这两种方法的优缺点,并提出了一种在地方和国家范围内的混合解决方案。