Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Center, Chicago, IL 60612, United States.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Center, Chicago, IL 60612, United States; Department of Behavioral Sciences, Olivet Nazarene University, Bourbonnais, IL 60914, United States.
J Anxiety Disord. 2022 Aug;90:102606. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2022.102606. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
Unresolved trauma-related guilt has been identified as a factor that can intensify posttraumatic stress disorder PTSD symptomology and is associated with many negative mental health outcomes. Evidence-based treatments, such as Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT), have been shown to successfully reduce trauma-related guilt. However, less is known about how trauma-related guilt cognitions change over the course of PTSD treatment and, more specifically, intensive PTSD treatments. The current study examined whether guilt cognitions (i.e., hindsight bias/responsibility, insufficient justification, wrongdoing) changed over the course of a 3-week CPT-based intensive treatment program (ITP), whether guilt cognition changes predicted PTSD and depression symptom reductions over time, and whether guilt cognition changes and their association with PTSD and depression symptom changes differed based on whether they worked on combat trauma or military sexual trauma. Data were collected from 360 veterans enrolled in a 3-week ITP. Results from linear mixed effects models suggested that trauma-related guilt cognitions reduced significantly over the course of treatment (ps < .001), changes in wrongdoing (p = .032) and hindsight bias/responsibility (p = .003) were significant predictors of PTSD symptom reductions and hindsight bias/responsibility (p = .032) was the only significant predictor of depression symptom reduction. Overall differences in guilt cognitions over time based on cohort type were only significant for insufficient justification (p = .001). These findings suggest that changes in hindsight bias/responsibility demonstrated the largest effect size (d = 0.1.14), implying that hindsight bias/responsibility may be one of the most important guilt cognitions to target. This study also highlights the importance of the relationship between trauma-related guilt and PTSD and depression symptoms. Future research should examine whether changes in guilt cognitions precede changes in PTSD and depression symptoms, and if addressing certain types of guilt cognitions is more important to achieving PTSD and depression symptom reductions.
未解决的创伤相关内疚已被确定为加剧创伤后应激障碍 (PTSD) 症状的因素,并且与许多负面心理健康结果相关。基于证据的治疗方法,如认知加工疗法 (CPT),已被证明可成功减少与创伤相关的内疚。然而,对于创伤相关内疚认知在 PTSD 治疗过程中如何变化,以及更具体地说,在密集的 PTSD 治疗中如何变化,了解较少。本研究探讨了内疚认知(即后见之明偏见/责任、理由不足、做错事)是否在基于 CPT 的 3 周密集治疗计划(ITP)过程中发生变化,内疚认知变化是否预测 PTSD 和抑郁症状随时间减少,以及内疚认知变化及其与 PTSD 和抑郁症状变化的关联是否因处理战斗创伤还是军事性创伤而有所不同。数据来自 360 名参加为期 3 周 ITP 的退伍军人。线性混合效应模型的结果表明,创伤相关内疚认知在治疗过程中显著降低(p<.001),做错事(p=.032)和后见之明偏见/责任(p=.003)的变化是 PTSD 症状减轻的显著预测因素,后见之明偏见/责任(p=.032)是抑郁症状减轻的唯一显著预测因素。基于队列类型,内疚认知随时间的总体差异仅在理由不足方面显著(p=.001)。这些发现表明,后见之明偏见/责任的变化表现出最大的效应量(d=0.114),这意味着后见之明偏见/责任可能是最重要的内疚认知之一。本研究还强调了创伤相关内疚与 PTSD 和抑郁症状之间关系的重要性。未来的研究应该检查内疚认知的变化是否先于 PTSD 和抑郁症状的变化,以及解决某些类型的内疚认知是否对减轻 PTSD 和抑郁症状更为重要。