Suppr超能文献

二线治疗在局灶性癫痫持续状态中的反应:一家三级医院的经验。

Reponse of second-line treatment in focal status epilepticus: A tertiary hospital experience.

机构信息

Epilepsy Unit. Hospital Vall Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.

Epilepsy Unit. Hospital Vall Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Epilepsy Res. 2022 Sep;185:106988. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2022.106988. Epub 2022 Jul 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the response to various antiseizure medications (ASMs) in the treatment of focal status epilepticus (SE) in the established phase, and the effect of administering several ASMs prior to sedation.

METHODS

All SE cases in patients aged > 16 years treated with non-BZDs ASMs were prospectively collected in our centre from February 2011 to April 2019. In total, 281 episodes were analysed.

RESULTS

Median age at SE onset was 65.1 years; 47 % were focal motor and 53 % focal non-motor episodes. SE cessation was achieved in 79 % episodes with second-line drugs, whereas a third line (anesthetics) was required in 47 episodes. SE cessation was achieved in only 27 % with the first ASM, 48 % with the second, and 51 % with the third. Prompt resolution of the SE episode with a first or second ASM was associated with a better outcome than episodes requiring a larger number of drugs (p = 0.024). The first option in our sample was levetiracetam in 70 % of cases. Among the total of non-responding SE cases treated with levetiracetam as the first ASM option, 107 were subsequently given lacosamide (seizure cessation in 53.3 %) and 34 valproic acid (seizure cessation in 29.4 %) (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

Our findings further support the notion that early termination of SE with a first or second ASM confers a better functional outcome. The large difference in response between the first ASM and consecutive ones suggests that the sum of different ASMs might be the key to resolving focal SE.

摘要

目的

研究在已建立的阶段中,各种抗癫痫药物(ASMs)治疗局灶性癫痫持续状态(SE)的反应,以及在镇静前使用多种 ASMs 的效果。

方法

我们中心从 2011 年 2 月至 2019 年 4 月前瞻性地收集了所有年龄大于 16 岁的接受非苯二氮䓬类 ASMs 治疗的 SE 患者的病例。共分析了 281 个发作。

结果

SE 发作时的中位年龄为 65.1 岁;47%为局灶性运动性发作,53%为局灶性非运动性发作。79%的发作通过二线药物停止,47%需要三线(麻醉剂)。仅有 27%的发作用第一种 ASM 停止,48%用第二种,51%用第三种。第一种或第二种 ASM 迅速终止 SE 发作与需要更多药物的发作相比,结果更好(p=0.024)。在我们的样本中,第一种选择是左乙拉西坦,占 70%。在以左乙拉西坦作为首选 ASM 治疗的所有非反应性 SE 病例中,107 例随后给予拉科酰胺(53.3%停止发作),34 例给予丙戊酸(29.4%停止发作)(p=0.015)。

结论

我们的发现进一步支持了这样的观点,即早期使用第一种或第二种 ASM 终止 SE 可获得更好的功能结果。第一种 ASM 与连续 ASM 之间的反应差异很大,这表明不同 ASMs 的总和可能是解决局灶性 SE 的关键。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验