Experimental Physiology and Biochemistry, Physical Education and Sport Center of Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, ES, Brazil.
Department of Physical Education, Estacio de Sá University, Vitoria, ES, Brazil.
Physiol Behav. 2022 Oct 15;255:113931. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.113931. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
The use of music in exercise sessions is considered an interesting strategy as it facilitates, through motivation, an improvement in physical performance, as well as a reduction in the subjective perception of effort and an improvement in mood. Such factors are important for the maintenance of physical exercise programs, however, considering high intensity interval training, the effects of music remain inconclusive. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of music during high intensity interval training sessions using body weight (HIIT-B) on the physiological parameters and mood state of adults.
11 CrossFit male practitioners were randomly submitted to three sessions of HIIT-B under the following experimental conditions: preference music (PM), non-preference music (nPM) and without music (WM). The HIIT-B protocol consisted of 20 sets of 30 s of stimulus using maximal intensities followed by 30 s of passive recovery. The following exercises were used: jumping jacks, burpee, mountain climber and squat jumping. The following parameters were analyzed: heart rate (HR), lactate (La), total amount of movements (TAM), affective response (AR), rating of perceived exertion (RPE), recovery (RPR) and mood states.
although an increase (p< 0.05) of HR, RPE and La, reduction of RPR was found after performing the HIIT session, no differences were found between the three conditions to these parameters. The nPM condition promoted lower (p< 0.001) TAM compared to the WM and PM conditions, which also differed from each other. However, for AR, a music effect was found among the protocols (p< 0.0001), indicating that the PM session promoted an increase in pleasure, unlike WM and nPM session which provided pleasure reduction and displeasure respectively. The WM session did not promote any changes. There were no main effects on time for depression and anger, which were different for vigor, fatigue, mental confusion, tension and mood disturbance. Additionally, differences were found after session to tension (p = 0.0229), vigor (p = 0.0424) and fatigue (p = 0.0400) for PM condition, vigor (p = 0.0424), fatigue (p = 0.0400) mental confusion (p = 0.0302) and mood disturbance (p = 0.0129) for nPM and vigor (p = 0.0363) and fatigue (p = 0.0468) to WM conditions.
Listening to preferred music during an 'all out' HIIT-B session increases exercise performance and elicits more positive affective responses in recreationally active adult males, despite similar HR, blood lactate, RPE and fatigue compared to nonpreferred music or no-music.
目的：本研究旨在评估在使用体重进行高强度间歇训练（HIIT-B）期间听音乐（PM）对成年人的生理参数和情绪状态的影响。
方法：11 名 CrossFit 男性参与者在以下实验条件下随机接受 3 次 HIIT-B 训练：偏好音乐（PM）、非偏好音乐（nPM）和无音乐（WM）。HIIT-B 方案由 20 组 30 秒最大强度刺激和 30 秒被动恢复组成。使用的练习包括开合跳、俯撑交替提膝、登山跑和深蹲跳。分析的参数包括心率（HR）、血乳酸（La）、总运动量（TAM）、情感反应（AR）、主观感觉用力程度（RPE）、恢复（RPR）和情绪状态。
结果：尽管在完成 HIIT 训练后，HR、RPE 和 La 均升高（p<0.05），RPR 降低，但在这三个条件之间，这些参数没有差异。nPM 条件与 WM 和 PM 条件相比，TAM 更低（p<0.001），而 WM 和 PM 条件之间也存在差异。然而，对于 AR，在方案之间发现了音乐效应（p<0.0001），表明 PM 方案与 WM 和 nPM 方案相比，增加了愉悦感，而 WM 和 nPM 方案则分别降低了愉悦感和产生了不愉快感。WM 方案没有引起任何变化。在抑郁和愤怒方面，时间没有主效应，在活力、疲劳、精神混乱、紧张和情绪困扰方面存在差异。此外，在 PM 条件下，训练后张力（p=0.0229）、活力（p=0.0424）和疲劳（p=0.0400）有差异，在 nPM 条件下，活力（p=0.0424）、疲劳（p=0.0400）、精神混乱（p=0.0302）和情绪困扰（p=0.0129）有差异，在 WM 条件下，活力（p=0.0363）和疲劳（p=0.0468）有差异。
结论：在“全力以赴”的 HIIT-B 训练期间听自己喜欢的音乐，尽管与非偏好音乐或无音乐相比，HR、血乳酸、RPE 和疲劳相似，但可以提高运动表现，并在休闲活跃的成年男性中引起更积极的情感反应。
