• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减轻结构性种族主义以减少脓毒症结局的不平等:一项混合方法、纵向干预研究。

Mitigating structural racism to reduce inequities in sepsis outcomes: a mixed methods, longitudinal intervention study.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, USA.

Yale Global Health Leadership Initiative, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, USA.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 30;22(1):975. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08331-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-022-08331-5
PMID:35907839
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9338573/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sepsis affects 1.7 million patients in the US annually, is one of the leading causes of mortality, and is a major driver of US healthcare costs. African American/Black and LatinX populations experience higher rates of sepsis complications, deviations from standard care, and readmissions compared with Non-Hispanic White populations. Despite clear evidence of structural racism in sepsis care and outcomes, there are no prospective interventions to mitigate structural racism in sepsis care, nor are we aware of studies that report reductions in racial inequities in sepsis care as an outcome. Therefore, we will deliver and evaluate a coalition-based intervention to equip health systems and their surrounding communities to mitigate structural racism, driving measurable reductions in inequities in sepsis outcomes. This paper presents the theoretical foundation for the study, summarizes key elements of the intervention, and describes the methodology to evaluate the intervention.

METHODS

Our aims are to: (1) deliver a coalition-based leadership intervention in eight U.S. health systems and their surrounding communities; (2) evaluate the impact of the intervention on organizational culture using a longitudinal, convergent mixed methods approach, and (3) evaluate the impact of the intervention on reduction of racial inequities in three clinical outcomes: a) early identification (time to antibiotic), b) clinical management (in-hospital sepsis mortality) and c) standards-based follow up (same-hospital, all-cause sepsis readmissions) using interrupted time series analysis.

DISCUSSION

This study is aligned with calls to action by the NIH and the Sepsis Alliance to address inequities in sepsis care and outcomes. It is the first to intervene to mitigate effects of structural racism by developing the domains of organizational culture that are required for anti-racist action, with implications for inequities in complex health outcomes beyond sepsis.

摘要

背景

每年有 170 万美国患者受到脓毒症的影响,它是导致死亡的主要原因之一,也是美国医疗保健成本的主要驱动因素。与非西班牙裔白人相比,非裔/黑人和拉丁裔人群的脓毒症并发症、偏离标准护理和再入院率更高。尽管脓毒症护理和结果中存在明显的结构性种族主义证据,但目前没有针对脓毒症护理中结构性种族主义的前瞻性干预措施,我们也不知道有研究报告将脓毒症护理中的种族不平等减少作为结果。因此,我们将提供并评估一个基于联盟的干预措施,以使卫生系统及其周围社区能够减轻结构性种族主义,从而在脓毒症结果方面实现可衡量的减少不平等。本文介绍了该研究的理论基础,总结了干预措施的关键要素,并描述了评估干预措施的方法。

方法

我们的目标是:(1) 在八个美国卫生系统及其周围社区开展基于联盟的领导力干预;(2) 使用纵向、收敛混合方法评估干预对组织文化的影响,以及 (3) 使用中断时间序列分析评估干预对减少三种临床结果中的种族不平等的影响:a) 早期识别(抗生素使用时间)、b) 临床管理(院内脓毒症死亡率)和 c) 基于标准的后续治疗(同一医院,所有原因的脓毒症再入院率)。

讨论

这项研究符合 NIH 和脓毒症联盟提出的行动呼吁,旨在解决脓毒症护理和结果中的不平等问题。这是第一个通过开发组织文化的领域来干预减轻结构性种族主义影响的研究,这些领域是反种族主义行动所必需的,对脓毒症以外的复杂健康结果中的不平等具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e2/9338573/6556719a0035/12913_2022_8331_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e2/9338573/c11090d2287d/12913_2022_8331_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e2/9338573/b27378041ec0/12913_2022_8331_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e2/9338573/6556719a0035/12913_2022_8331_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e2/9338573/c11090d2287d/12913_2022_8331_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e2/9338573/b27378041ec0/12913_2022_8331_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e2/9338573/6556719a0035/12913_2022_8331_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Mitigating structural racism to reduce inequities in sepsis outcomes: a mixed methods, longitudinal intervention study.减轻结构性种族主义以减少脓毒症结局的不平等:一项混合方法、纵向干预研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 30;22(1):975. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08331-5.
2
Actual Racial/Ethnic Disparities in COVID-19 Mortality for the Non-Hispanic Black Compared to Non-Hispanic White Population in 35 US States and Their Association with Structural Racism.35 个美国州的非西班牙裔黑人群体与非西班牙裔白人群体在 COVID-19 死亡率方面的实际种族/民族差异及其与结构性种族主义的关系。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022 Jun;9(3):886-898. doi: 10.1007/s40615-021-01028-1. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
3
EQUIP Emergency: study protocol for an organizational intervention to promote equity in health care.EQUIP 紧急事件:一项组织干预措施研究方案,以促进医疗保健公平。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 10;19(1):687. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4494-2.
4
The relationship between state-level structural racism and disparities between the non-hispanic black and non-hispanic white populations in multiple health outcomes.州级结构性种族主义与多种健康结果中黑人和白人之间的差异之间的关系。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2023 Apr;115(2):207-222. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2023.01.010. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
5
Critical race theory as a tool for understanding poor engagement along the HIV care continuum among African American/Black and Hispanic persons living with HIV in the United States: a qualitative exploration.批判种族理论作为理解美国非裔/黑人及西班牙裔艾滋病毒感染者在艾滋病毒护理连续过程中参与度低的一种工具:一项定性探索。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Mar 24;16(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0549-3.
6
Elucidating measures of systemic racism to mitigate racial disparities in kidney transplantation.阐明衡量系统性种族主义的措施,以减轻肾脏移植中的种族差异。
Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2021 Oct 1;26(5):554-559. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000913.
7
Addressing anti-black racism in an academic preterm birth initiative: perspectives from a mixed methods case study.解决学术性早产倡议中的反黑种族主义:一项混合方法案例研究的观点。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 18;23(1):2039. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16812-3.
8
Structural Racism and Lung Cancer Risk: A Scoping Review.结构性种族主义与肺癌风险:范围综述。
JAMA Oncol. 2024 Jan 1;10(1):122-128. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.4897.
9
Structural Racism, Place, and COVID-19: A Narrative Review Describing How We Prepare for an Endemic COVID-19 Future.结构性种族主义、地域与新冠疫情:一篇叙述性综述,描述我们如何为新冠疫情的地方流行未来做准备。
Health Equity. 2022 May 12;6(1):356-366. doi: 10.1089/heq.2021.0190. eCollection 2022.
10
The Impact of Structural Racism on Continuity of Care at Pediatric Academic Primary Care Clinics.结构性种族主义对儿科大学初级保健诊所医疗连续性的影响。
Acad Pediatr. 2024 Sep-Oct;24(7):1116-1123. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2024.05.011. Epub 2024 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Be-SNAP: the Belgian Sepsis National Action Plan.比利时脓毒症国家行动计划(Be-SNAP)
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 1;13:1575502. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1575502. eCollection 2025.
2
Barriers to Optimal Clinician Guideline Adherence in Management of Markedly Elevated Blood Pressure: A Qualitative Study.显著高血压管理中临床医生遵循指南的障碍:定性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2426135. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.26135.
3
Barriers to Optimal Clinician Guideline Adherence in the Management of Markedly Elevated Blood Pressure: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Electronic Health Records.

本文引用的文献

1
Current Trends in Sepsis-Related Mortality in the United States.美国脓毒症相关死亡率的当前趋势。
Crit Care Med. 2021 Aug 1;49(8):1276-1284. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005017.
2
Antibiotic Timing and Progression to Septic Shock Among Patients in the ED With Suspected Infection.急诊疑似感染患者抗生素时机与脓毒性休克进展。
Chest. 2022 Jan;161(1):112-120. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.06.029. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
3
Racial Disparities in Readmissions Following Initial Hospitalization for Sepsis.初始住院治疗后脓毒症再入院的种族差异。
显著高血压管理中临床医生最佳遵循指南的障碍:电子健康记录的定性内容分析
medRxiv. 2024 Jan 13:2024.01.12.24301223. doi: 10.1101/2024.01.12.24301223.
4
Order Set Usage is Associated With Lower Hospital Mortality in Patients With Sepsis.医嘱集的使用与脓毒症患者较低的医院死亡率相关。
Crit Care Explor. 2023 May 16;5(5):e0918. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000918. eCollection 2023 May.
5
The landscape of disparities in obstetric neurocritical care and a path forward.产科神经重症护理中的差异现状及未来发展方向。
Front Neurol. 2023 Jan 6;13:1008544. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1008544. eCollection 2022.
Crit Care Med. 2021 Mar 1;49(3):e258-e268. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004809.
4
How Structural Racism Works - Racist Policies as a Root Cause of U.S. Racial Health Inequities.结构性种族主义如何起作用——种族主义政策是美国种族健康不平等的根源
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 25;384(8):768-773. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms2025396. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
5
Structural Racism and Health Disparities: Reconfiguring the Social Determinants of Health Framework to Include the Root Cause.结构性种族主义与健康不平等:重新构建健康决定因素框架以纳入根本原因
J Law Med Ethics. 2020 Sep;48(3):518-526. doi: 10.1177/1073110520958876.
6
Changing hospital organisational culture for improved patient outcomes: developing and implementing the leadership saves lives intervention.改变医院组织文化以改善患者预后:领导拯救生命干预措施的制定与实施。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Jun;30(6):475-483. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010734. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
7
Sepsis Among Medicare Beneficiaries: 2. The Trajectories of Sepsis, 2012-2018.医疗保险受益人群中的脓毒症:2. 2012-2018 年脓毒症的轨迹。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Mar;48(3):289-301. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004226.
8
Sepsis Among Medicare Beneficiaries: 1. The Burdens of Sepsis, 2012-2018.医疗保险受益人群中的败血症:1. 2012-2018 年败血症负担。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Mar;48(3):276-288. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004224.
9
"Everything Is Perfect, and We Have No Problems": Detecting and Limiting Social Desirability Bias in Qualitative Research.“一切完美,我们没有问题”:在定性研究中发现和限制社会期望偏差。
Qual Health Res. 2020 Apr;30(5):783-792. doi: 10.1177/1049732319889354. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
10
Racial Differences in Sepsis Recognition in the Emergency Department.急诊科中脓毒症识别的种族差异。
Pediatrics. 2019 Oct;144(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-0348. Epub 2019 Sep 13.