• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初始住院治疗后脓毒症再入院的种族差异。

Racial Disparities in Readmissions Following Initial Hospitalization for Sepsis.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO.

Division of Specialty Care Pharmacy, St. Louis College of Pharmacy, St. Louis, MO.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2021 Mar 1;49(3):e258-e268. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004809.

DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000004809
PMID:33566463
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether Black race is associated with a higher rate of all-cause readmission compared with White race following community-onset sepsis.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

One-thousand three-hundred bed urban academic medical centers.

PATIENTS

Three-thousand three-hundred ninety patients hospitalized with community-onset sepsis between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2017.

INTERVENTIONS

Community-onset sepsis was defined as patients admitted through the emergency department with an International Classification of Disease, ninth revision, Clinical Modification code for either severe sepsis (995.92) or septic shock (785.52). Beginning in 2015, we used International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes R65.20 (severe sepsis) and R65.21 (septic shock). We excluded those individuals hospitalized at another acute care facility that were transferred to our facility. Race was abstracted electronically, and patients who expired or self-identified as a race other than Black or White race were excluded. Patients who experienced a subsequent hospitalization at our facility were considered to be readmitted.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Compared with White race, Black race demonstrated a significantly higher rate of all-cause readmission (60.8% vs 71.1%; p < 0.001), including a higher rate of readmission for sepsis (14.0% vs 19.8%; p < 0.001). Black patients also resided in zip codes with a lower median household income and were more likely to use public insurance compared with White race. Similar rates of comorbid diseases and disease burden were observed between the two groups, but vasopressors were less likely to be administered to Black patients. Multivariable analysis showed that Black race was associated with a 50% increased odds (odds ratio, 1.52, 99% CI, 1.25-1.84) in all-cause readmission risk compared with White race.

CONCLUSIONS

Black race was associated with a higher rate of all-cause and sepsis readmission, possibly as a result of unaddressed health disparities, compared with White race. Programs addressing healthcare disparities should use readmission as another marker of equity.

摘要

目的

评估在社区获得性脓毒症后,与白种人相比,黑种人是否与更高的全因再入院率相关。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

一家拥有 1300 张床位的城市学术医疗中心。

患者

2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间,因社区获得性脓毒症住院的 3390 名患者。

干预

社区获得性脓毒症定义为通过急诊科入院的患者,其国际疾病分类,第九修订版,临床修正代码为严重脓毒症(995.92)或脓毒性休克(785.52)。从 2015 年开始,我们使用国际疾病分类,第十版,临床修正代码 R65.20(严重脓毒症)和 R65.21(脓毒性休克)。我们排除了在另一家急性护理机构住院并转至我们机构的患者。种族是通过电子方式提取的,并且死亡或自认为不属于黑种人或白种人的患者被排除在外。在我们机构再次住院的患者被视为再入院。

测量和主要结果

与白种人相比,黑种人全因再入院率(60.8%比 71.1%;p<0.001)显著更高,包括脓毒症再入院率(14.0%比 19.8%;p<0.001)更高。黑人患者的居住邮政编码中位数家庭收入也较低,并且与白种人相比,他们更有可能使用公共保险。两组之间观察到相似的合并症和疾病负担发生率,但血管加压药的使用可能性较小。多变量分析显示,与白种人相比,黑种人全因再入院风险增加 50%(优势比,1.52,99%置信区间,1.25-1.84)。

结论

与白种人相比,黑种人全因和脓毒症再入院率更高,这可能是由于未解决的健康差异所致。解决医疗保健差异的计划应将再入院作为公平的另一个指标。

相似文献

1
Racial Disparities in Readmissions Following Initial Hospitalization for Sepsis.初始住院治疗后脓毒症再入院的种族差异。
Crit Care Med. 2021 Mar 1;49(3):e258-e268. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004809.
2
Thirty-day readmission rates for Medicare beneficiaries by race and site of care.按种族和护理地点划分的 Medicare 受益人的 30 天再入院率。
JAMA. 2011 Feb 16;305(7):675-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.123.
3
Racial and Ethnic Differences in 30-Day Hospital Readmissions Among US Adults With Diabetes.美国成年人糖尿病患者 30 天内住院再入院的种族和民族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1913249. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.13249.
4
Occurrence and outcomes of sepsis: influence of race.脓毒症的发生率及转归:种族的影响
Crit Care Med. 2007 Mar;35(3):763-8. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000256726.80998.BF.
5
Association of Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities With Outcomes Among Patients Hospitalized With Acute Myocardial Infarction, Heart Failure, and Pneumonia: An Analysis of Within- and Between-Hospital Variation.种族和社会经济差异与急性心肌梗死、心力衰竭和肺炎住院患者结局的关联:医院内和医院间变异的分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Sep 7;1(5):e182044. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2044.
6
Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Hip Fracture Care.髋部骨折护理中的种族和社会经济差异。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 May 18;98(10):858-65. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00676.
7
Reductions in Race and Ethnic Disparities in Hospital Readmissions Following Total Joint Arthroplasty from 2005 to 2015.2005 年至 2015 年全关节置换术后住院再入院的种族和民族差异减少。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Nov 20;101(22):2044-2050. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.01112.
8
Disparities in surgical 30-day readmission rates for Medicare beneficiaries by race and site of care.医疗保险受益人的种族和护理地点差异与 30 天内再次入院率的手术。
Ann Surg. 2014 Jun;259(6):1086-90. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000326.
9
Assessment of Racial Disparities in the Risks of Septic and Aseptic Revision Total Knee Replacements.评估种族差异对全膝关节置换术后感染性和无菌性翻修风险的影响。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2117581. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.17581.
10
Characteristics Associated With Racial/Ethnic Disparities in COVID-19 Outcomes in an Academic Health Care System.在学术医疗体系中,与新冠疫情结果的种族/民族差异相关的特征。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2025197. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25197.

引用本文的文献

1
Racial Disparities in Septic Shock Outcomes: A Nationwide Analysis (2016-2020).脓毒性休克结局中的种族差异:一项全国性分析(2016 - 2020年)
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Apr 14. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09501-x.
2
Prediction of Readmission Following Sepsis Using Social Determinants of Health.利用健康的社会决定因素预测脓毒症患者的再入院率。
Crit Care Explor. 2024 May 24;6(6):e1099. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001099. eCollection 2024 Jun 1.
3
Sociodemographic Factors are Associated with Care Delivery and Outcomes in Pediatric Severe Sepsis.
社会人口学因素与儿童严重脓毒症的治疗及预后相关。
Crit Care Explor. 2024 Feb 23;6(3):e1056. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001056. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Rapid systematic review on risks and outcomes of sepsis: the influence of risk factors associated with health inequalities.关于脓毒症风险和结局的快速系统评价:与健康不平等相关的危险因素的影响。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Feb 21;23(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02114-6.
5
The Assessment of Social Determinants of Health in Postsepsis Mortality and Readmission: A Scoping Review.脓毒症后死亡率和再入院中健康的社会决定因素评估:一项范围综述
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Jul 29;4(8):e0722. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000722. eCollection 2022 Aug.
6
Mitigating structural racism to reduce inequities in sepsis outcomes: a mixed methods, longitudinal intervention study.减轻结构性种族主义以减少脓毒症结局的不平等:一项混合方法、纵向干预研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 30;22(1):975. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08331-5.