• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于优化方法的水资源承载力空间分异评价——以中国福建为例

Evaluation of spatial variation of water resources carrying capacity using optimal method: a case study of Fujian, China.

作者信息

Yang Xi

机构信息

School of Civil Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(1):1048-1059. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22284-6. Epub 2022 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-022-22284-6
PMID:35908029
Abstract

Studying regional water resources carrying capacity (WRCC) is an important guarantee for realizing regional sustainable development. Previous evaluation of WRCC mainly focused on the construction of the index system and the optimization of multiattribute decision analysis methods (MDAMs). The selection of the weighting assignment method (WAM) is a key link in the evaluation of WRCC, but different WAMs may bring different results, which brings challenges to the actual WRCC evaluation. Therefore, this paper proposes a WAM selection framework, under which WRCC evaluation index system is firstly constructed. Secondly, from the four objective WAMs, the most suitable WAM is identified and selected to evaluate WRCC in Fujian Province in terms of the reliability and stability of the evaluation results. In addition, the main factors affecting regional WRCC are discussed using the obstacle degree model. The results show that (1) under the same evaluation index system, the CRITIC method was the suitable method with more reliability and stability than the coefficient of variation method, the entropy method, and the equal weight method. (2) The higher water resources carrying capacity (level I) is mainly located in the west of the study area, and the lower one (level V) is located in the east coast. (3) The superimposition effects ecological water use rate, water production modulus, acreage water consumption of farmland irrigation, per capita water resources, and COD emissions hindering the level of regional WRCC. The framework proposed in this study can provide methodological options for quantitative evaluation of WRCC. The results of this paper provide favorable support for decision makers to carry out rational planning of resources.

摘要

研究区域水资源承载能力(WRCC)是实现区域可持续发展的重要保障。以往对WRCC的评估主要集中在指标体系的构建和多属性决策分析方法(MDAMs)的优化上。权重分配方法(WAM)的选择是WRCC评估中的关键环节,但不同的WAM可能会带来不同的结果,这给实际的WRCC评估带来了挑战。因此,本文提出了一个WAM选择框架,在此框架下,首先构建WRCC评估指标体系。其次,从四种客观WAM中,根据评估结果的可靠性和稳定性,识别并选择最合适的WAM来评估福建省的WRCC。此外,利用障碍度模型探讨了影响区域WRCC的主要因素。结果表明:(1)在相同的评估指标体系下,CRITIC方法是合适的方法,其可靠性和稳定性高于变异系数法、熵权法和等权法。(2)较高的水资源承载能力(一级)主要位于研究区域的西部,较低的(五级)位于东部沿海。(3)生态用水率、产水模数、农田灌溉亩均用水量、人均水资源量和化学需氧量排放的叠加效应阻碍了区域WRCC水平。本研究提出的框架可为WRCC的定量评估提供方法选择。本文的结果为决策者进行合理的资源规划提供了有力支持。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of spatial variation of water resources carrying capacity using optimal method: a case study of Fujian, China.基于优化方法的水资源承载力空间分异评价——以中国福建为例
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(1):1048-1059. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22284-6. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
2
Comprehensive evaluation on water resource carrying capacity in karst areas using cloud model with combination weighting method: a case study of Guiyang, southwest China.基于组合赋权云模型的岩溶区水资源承载能力综合评价——以中国西南地区贵阳市为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Oct;27(29):37057-37073. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09499-1. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
3
Trend analysis and obstacle factor of inter provincial water resources carrying capacity in China: from the perspective of decoupling pressure and support capacity.中国省际水资源承载能力的趋势分析与障碍因素:基于脱钩压力与支撑能力视角
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(21):31551-31566. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-18255-y. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
4
Study on water resources carrying capacity based on Pressure-State-Response modeling: An empirical study of the urban agglomeration in Central Yunnan, China.基于压力-状态-响应模型的水资源承载力研究:以中国滇中城市群为例的实证研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 12;19(9):e0308503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308503. eCollection 2024.
5
Comprehensive evaluation of water resources carrying capacity and analysis of obstacle factors in Weifang City based on hierarchical cluster analysis-VIKOR method.基于层次聚类分析-VIKOR 法的潍坊市水资源承载力综合评价及障碍因子分析
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Sep;28(36):50388-50404. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14236-3. Epub 2021 May 6.
6
Predictive analysis of water resource carrying capacity based on system dynamics and improved fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method in Henan Province.基于系统动力学和改进模糊综合评价法的河南省水资源承载力预测分析。
Environ Monit Assess. 2022 Jun 14;194(7):500. doi: 10.1007/s10661-022-10131-7.
7
Comprehensive evaluation of water resources carrying capacity in Henan Province based on entropy weight TOPSIS - coupling coordination - obstacle model.基于熵权 TOPSIS-耦合协调-障碍模型的河南省水资源承载力综合评价
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Nov;30(54):115820-115838. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30456-1. Epub 2023 Oct 28.
8
Evaluating water resource carrying capacity using the deep learning method: a case study of Yunnan, Southwest China.利用深度学习方法评估水资源承载能力:以中国西南云南省为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(32):48812-48826. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19330-8. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
9
Analysis of sustainable water resource management and driving mechanism in arid region: a case study of Xinjiang, China, from 2005 to 2020.分析干旱地区水资源可持续管理及驱动机制——以 2005 年至 2020 年中国新疆为例
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(10):15900-15919. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32092-9. Epub 2024 Feb 3.
10
Water resource carrying capacity and obstacle factors in the Yellow River basin based on the RBF neural network model.基于 RBF 神经网络模型的黄河流域水资源承载能力及其障碍因子
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(9):22743-22759. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23712-3. Epub 2022 Oct 28.