Yang Xi
School of Civil Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, China.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(1):1048-1059. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22284-6. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
Studying regional water resources carrying capacity (WRCC) is an important guarantee for realizing regional sustainable development. Previous evaluation of WRCC mainly focused on the construction of the index system and the optimization of multiattribute decision analysis methods (MDAMs). The selection of the weighting assignment method (WAM) is a key link in the evaluation of WRCC, but different WAMs may bring different results, which brings challenges to the actual WRCC evaluation. Therefore, this paper proposes a WAM selection framework, under which WRCC evaluation index system is firstly constructed. Secondly, from the four objective WAMs, the most suitable WAM is identified and selected to evaluate WRCC in Fujian Province in terms of the reliability and stability of the evaluation results. In addition, the main factors affecting regional WRCC are discussed using the obstacle degree model. The results show that (1) under the same evaluation index system, the CRITIC method was the suitable method with more reliability and stability than the coefficient of variation method, the entropy method, and the equal weight method. (2) The higher water resources carrying capacity (level I) is mainly located in the west of the study area, and the lower one (level V) is located in the east coast. (3) The superimposition effects ecological water use rate, water production modulus, acreage water consumption of farmland irrigation, per capita water resources, and COD emissions hindering the level of regional WRCC. The framework proposed in this study can provide methodological options for quantitative evaluation of WRCC. The results of this paper provide favorable support for decision makers to carry out rational planning of resources.
研究区域水资源承载能力(WRCC)是实现区域可持续发展的重要保障。以往对WRCC的评估主要集中在指标体系的构建和多属性决策分析方法(MDAMs)的优化上。权重分配方法(WAM)的选择是WRCC评估中的关键环节,但不同的WAM可能会带来不同的结果,这给实际的WRCC评估带来了挑战。因此,本文提出了一个WAM选择框架,在此框架下,首先构建WRCC评估指标体系。其次,从四种客观WAM中,根据评估结果的可靠性和稳定性,识别并选择最合适的WAM来评估福建省的WRCC。此外,利用障碍度模型探讨了影响区域WRCC的主要因素。结果表明:(1)在相同的评估指标体系下,CRITIC方法是合适的方法,其可靠性和稳定性高于变异系数法、熵权法和等权法。(2)较高的水资源承载能力(一级)主要位于研究区域的西部,较低的(五级)位于东部沿海。(3)生态用水率、产水模数、农田灌溉亩均用水量、人均水资源量和化学需氧量排放的叠加效应阻碍了区域WRCC水平。本研究提出的框架可为WRCC的定量评估提供方法选择。本文的结果为决策者进行合理的资源规划提供了有力支持。