Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Azinhaga de Santa Comba, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal; Bluepharma - Indústria Farmacêutica, São Martinho do Bispo, 3045-016 Coimbra, Portugal.
Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Azinhaga de Santa Comba, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal; Coimbra Chemistry Centre, Department of Chemistry, University of Coimbra, Rua Larga, 3004-535 Coimbra, Portugal.
Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2022 Sep;178:1-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2022.07.014. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
The emergence of innovator-driven complex drug products, such as Non-Biological Complex Drugs (NBCDs), has provided disruptive advances in the Nanotechnology and Biotechnology fields. However, the design and development of NBCDs can be particularly challenging due to some unresolved scientific and regulatory challenges associated with the pharmaceutical quality assessment. The application of a more holistic, systematic, integrated science and risk-based approach, such as Quality by Design (QbD), is essential to address key scientific, technological, and regulatory constraints in the research and development of the NBCDs. The deeper product and process understanding derived from the implementation of the QbD approach ensures consistent, reliable, and high-quality pharmaceutical products. Furthermore, this approach promotes innovation and continuous improvement in the entire product lifecycle. Regulatory authorities highly recommend QbD-based submissions to successfully translate NBCDs from laboratory-scale research to the pharmaceutical market with the required quality, safety, and efficacy standards. The main aim of this article is to obtain a comprehensive and in-depth investigation into the state of implementation of the QbD approach in the pharmaceutical development and marketing authorization of NBCDs in Europe and the United States, through the analysis of the available data from their regulatory dossiers. In addition, it aims to understand and discuss how the QbD approach is used and implemented for complex drug products in the pharmaceutical industry, highlighting the gaps and challenges involved with its implementation. An analysis is held regarding QbD's advantages in terms of knowledge growth, regulatory flexibility, and the speed of development based on big data science, along with the reduction of regulatory failures and market withdrawals.
创新驱动的复杂药物产品(如非生物复杂药物(NBCD))的出现,为纳米技术和生物技术领域提供了突破性的进展。然而,由于与药物质量评估相关的一些未解决的科学和监管挑战,NBCD 的设计和开发可能特别具有挑战性。应用更全面、系统、综合的科学和基于风险的方法,如质量源于设计(QbD),对于解决 NBCD 研发中的关键科学、技术和监管限制至关重要。通过实施 QbD 方法,可以获得更深入的产品和工艺理解,从而确保药物产品具有一致性、可靠性和高质量。此外,这种方法还促进了整个产品生命周期的创新和持续改进。监管机构强烈建议基于 QbD 的申报,以便成功地将 NBCD 从实验室规模的研究转化为具有所需质量、安全性和疗效标准的药物市场。本文的主要目的是通过分析欧洲和美国监管档案中的可用数据,全面深入地调查 QbD 方法在 NBCD 药物开发和上市许可中的实施情况。此外,本文还旨在了解和讨论制药行业如何将 QbD 方法用于和实施复杂药物产品,并强调其实施所涉及的差距和挑战。基于大数据科学,分析了 QbD 在知识增长、监管灵活性和开发速度方面的优势,以及减少监管失败和市场撤回的情况。