• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于规则算法在 PI-RADS 标准化报告评估中的效用。

Utility of a Rule-Based Algorithm in the Assessment of Standardized Reporting in PI-RADS.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2023 Jun;30(6):1141-1147. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.06.024. Epub 2022 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2022.06.024
PMID:35909050
Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Adoption of the Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System (PI-RADS) has been shown to increase detection of clinically significant prostate cancer on prostate mpMRI. We propose that a rule-based algorithm based on Regular Expression (RegEx) matching can be used to automatically categorize prostate mpMRI reports into categories as a means by which to assess for opportunities for quality improvement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All prostate mpMRIs performed in the Duke University Health System from January 2, 2015, to January 29, 2021, were analyzed. Exclusion criteria were applied, for a total of 5343 male patients and 6264 prostate mpMRI reports. These reports were then analyzed by our RegEx algorithm to be categorized as PI-RADS 1 through PI-RADS 5, Recurrent Disease, or "No Information Available." A stratified, random sample of 502 mpMRI reports was reviewed by a blinded clinical team to assess performance of the RegEx algorithm.

RESULTS

Compared to manual review, the RegEx algorithm achieved overall accuracy of 92.6%, average precision of 88.8%, average recall of 85.6%, and F1 score of 0.871. The clinical team also reviewed 344 cases that were classified as "No Information Available," and found that in 150 instances, no numerical PI-RADS score for any lesion was included in the impression section of the mpMRI report.

CONCLUSION

Rule-based processing is an accurate method for the large-scale, automated extraction of PI-RADS scores from the text of radiology reports. These natural language processing approaches can be used for future initiatives in quality improvement in prostate mpMRI reporting with PI-RADS.

摘要

原理和目的

采用前列腺成像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)已经被证明可以提高前列腺多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)上临床显著前列腺癌的检出率。我们提出,基于正则表达式(RegEx)匹配的规则算法可用于自动将前列腺 mpMRI 报告分类为特定类别,以此作为评估质量改进机会的一种手段。

材料和方法

分析了 2015 年 1 月 2 日至 2021 年 1 月 29 日期间在杜克大学健康系统进行的所有前列腺 mpMRI。排除标准适用于总共 5343 名男性患者和 6264 份前列腺 mpMRI 报告。然后,我们的 RegEx 算法分析这些报告,将其分类为 PI-RADS 1 至 PI-RADS 5、复发性疾病或“无信息可用”。通过分层、随机选择的 502 份 mpMRI 报告由一个盲法临床团队进行评估,以评估 RegEx 算法的性能。

结果

与手动审查相比,RegEx 算法的总体准确率为 92.6%,平均精度为 88.8%,平均召回率为 85.6%,F1 得分为 0.871。临床团队还审查了 344 例被归类为“无信息可用”的病例,发现有 150 例,mpMRI 报告印象部分没有包含任何病变的数字 PI-RADS 评分。

结论

基于规则的处理是一种从放射学报告的文本中大规模自动提取 PI-RADS 评分的准确方法。这些自然语言处理方法可用于未来在 PI-RADS 指导下进行前列腺 mpMRI 报告的质量改进工作。

相似文献

1
Utility of a Rule-Based Algorithm in the Assessment of Standardized Reporting in PI-RADS.基于规则算法在 PI-RADS 标准化报告评估中的效用。
Acad Radiol. 2023 Jun;30(6):1141-1147. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.06.024. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
2
Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分与指数病变和多灶性、临床显著前列腺癌的相关性。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 May;1(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 May 15.
3
Head-to-head comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric MRI of the prostate before robot-assisted transperineal fusion prostate biopsy.前列腺机器人辅助经会阴融合前列腺活检前前列腺双参数与多参数 MRI 的头对头比较。
World J Urol. 2022 Oct;40(10):2431-2438. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04120-1. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
4
Structured approach to resolving discordance between PI-RADS v2.1 score and targeted prostate biopsy results: an opportunity for quality improvement.采用结构化方法解决 PI-RADS v2.1 评分与靶向前列腺活检结果之间的差异:提高质量的机会。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Aug;47(8):2917-2927. doi: 10.1007/s00261-022-03562-w. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
5
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate underestimates tumour volume of small visible lesions.前列腺多参数磁共振成像会低估小的可见病变的肿瘤体积。
BJU Int. 2022 Feb;129(2):201-207. doi: 10.1111/bju.15498. Epub 2021 Jun 13.
6
Prostate cancer detection on transrectal ultrasonography-guided random biopsy despite negative real-time magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided targeted biopsy: reasons for targeted biopsy failure.经直肠超声引导下随机活检发现前列腺癌,尽管实时磁共振成像/超声融合引导下靶向活检结果为阴性:靶向活检失败的原因
BJU Int. 2016 Jul;118(1):35-43. doi: 10.1111/bju.13327. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
7
Evaluation of the accuracy of multiparametric MRI for predicting prostate cancer pathology and tumour staging in the real world: an multicentre study.多参数 MRI 预测真实世界前列腺癌病理和肿瘤分期的准确性评估:一项多中心研究。
BJU Int. 2019 Aug;124(2):297-301. doi: 10.1111/bju.14696. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
8
Application of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADS v2): Interobserver Agreement and Positive Predictive Value for Localization of Intermediate- and High-Grade Prostate Cancers on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.前列腺影像报告和数据系统第2版(PI-RADS v2)的应用:多参数磁共振成像中高级别前列腺癌定位的观察者间一致性和阳性预测值
Acad Radiol. 2017 Sep;24(9):1101-1106. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.03.019. Epub 2017 May 22.
9
Prostate Indeterminate Lesions on Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Biopsy Versus Surveillance: A Literature Review.磁共振成像引导下前列腺活检与监测的不确定病变:文献综述。
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Sep;5(5):799-806. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.02.012. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
10
Annual mpMRI surveillance: PI-RADS upgrading and increasing trend correlated with patients who harbor clinically significant disease.年度 mpMRI 监测:PI-RADS 升级和增加趋势与存在临床显著疾病的患者相关。
Urol Oncol. 2024 May;42(5):158.e11-158.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.005. Epub 2024 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Automated Extraction of Imaging and Pathology Data From Diverse Prostate Cancer Electronic Records.从多种前列腺癌电子记录中自动提取影像和病理数据
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2025 Aug;9:e2500085. doi: 10.1200/CCI-25-00085. Epub 2025 Aug 7.
2
Using a transformer language model to curate a pulmonary embolism dataset from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV: MIMIC-IV-Ext-PE.使用变压器语言模型从重症监护医学信息库IV:MIMIC-IV-Ext-PE中筛选出肺栓塞数据集。
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2025 May 21;9(4):102896. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2025.102896. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Automatic text classification of prostate cancer malignancy scores in radiology reports using NLP models.
利用自然语言处理模型对放射学报告中的前列腺癌恶性程度评分进行自动文本分类。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2024 Nov;62(11):3373-3383. doi: 10.1007/s11517-024-03131-x. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
4
Bridging Communication Gaps Between Radiologists, Referring Physicians, and Patients Through Standardized Structured Cancer Imaging Reporting: The Experience with Female Pelvic MRI Assessment Using O-RADS and a Simulated Cohort Patient Group.通过标准化结构化癌症影像报告来弥合放射科医生、转诊医生和患者之间的沟通差距:使用 O-RADS 和模拟队列患者组评估女性盆腔 MRI 的经验。
Acad Radiol. 2024 Apr;31(4):1388-1397. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.08.005. Epub 2023 Sep 1.