Suppr超能文献

教师和支持专家在判断学生的读写能力时有多准确?特殊教育服务作为影响判断的外部因素。

How accurate are teachers and support specialists when judging students' literacy skills? Special educational service as an external factor influencing judgements.

机构信息

School of Educational Sciences, Tallinn University, Tallinn, Estonia.

Department of Education, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.

出版信息

Dyslexia. 2022 Nov;28(4):378-396. doi: 10.1002/dys.1725. Epub 2022 Jul 31.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to examine the accuracy of Estonian teachers' and support specialists' judgements of students' spelling skills and reading fluency and to investigate the provision of special education services to students as a factor influencing teachers' judgements. The sample included 11 classroom teachers, 8 support specialists, and 187 third-grade students. The judgements were collected using scales, and students' literacy skills were assessed using group and individual tests. The results indicated that judgements of reading fluency were less accurate than those of spelling skills. In addition, the provision of special education services influenced teachers' judgements, directing them to identify students in need of help, even if the teacher did not initially assign the student to the low-skilled group. Unexpectedly, teachers' judgements of the skills of students receiving special education services were slightly more accurate than support specialists' judgements.

摘要

本研究旨在检验爱沙尼亚教师和支持专家对学生拼写技能和阅读流畅性判断的准确性,并探讨提供特殊教育服务作为影响教师判断的因素。样本包括 11 名课堂教师、8 名支持专家和 187 名三年级学生。判断是通过量表收集的,学生的读写能力是通过小组和个人测试评估的。结果表明,阅读流畅性的判断准确性低于拼写技能。此外,特殊教育服务的提供影响了教师的判断,促使他们识别出需要帮助的学生,即使教师最初没有将学生分配到低技能组。出乎意料的是,接受特殊教育服务的学生技能判断比支持专家的判断更准确。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验