de Groot Marlies, Schaafsma Juliette, Castelain Thomas, Malinowska Katarzyna, Mann Liesbeth, Ohtsubo Yohsuke, Wulandari Maria Theresia Asti, Bataineh Ruba Fahmi, Fry Douglas P, Goudbeek Martijn, Suryani Angela
Tilburg University The Netherlands.
University of Costa Rica Costa Rica.
Eur J Soc Psychol. 2021 Dec;51(7):1198-1212. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2808. Epub 2022 Feb 20.
To date, there has been no systematic examination of cross-cultural differences in group-based shame, guilt, and regret following wrongdoing. Using a community sample ( = 1358), we examined people's reported experiences of shame, guilt, and regret following transgressions by themselves and by different identity groups (i.e., family, community, country) in Burkina Faso, Costa Rica, Indonesia, Japan, Jordan, the Netherlands, Poland, and the United States. We assessed whether any variation in this regard can be explained by the relative endorsement of individualistic or collectivistic values at the individual level and at the country level. Our findings suggest that people's reported experience of these emotions mostly depends on the transgression level. We also observe some variation across individuals and countries, which can be partially explained by the endorsement of collectivistic and individualistic values. The results highlight the importance of taking into account individual and cultural values when studying group-based emotions, as well as the identity groups involved in the transgression.
迄今为止,尚未有人对不当行为后基于群体的羞耻感、内疚感和悔恨感的跨文化差异进行系统研究。我们以一个社区样本(N = 1358)为研究对象,考察了布基纳法索、哥斯达黎加、印度尼西亚、日本、约旦、荷兰、波兰和美国的人们在自身及不同身份群体(即家庭、社区、国家)做出违规行为后所报告的羞耻、内疚和悔恨经历。我们评估了在这方面的任何差异是否可以通过个体层面和国家层面个人主义或集体主义价值观的相对认可度来解释。我们的研究结果表明,人们报告的这些情绪体验主要取决于违规行为的程度。我们还观察到个体和国家之间存在一些差异,这可以部分地通过集体主义和个人主义价值观的认可度来解释。研究结果凸显了在研究基于群体的情绪以及违规行为所涉及的身份群体时,考虑个体和文化价值观的重要性。