Suppr超能文献

在缺血性中风患者中,三种经颅直流电刺激方案对脑电图的阿尔法节律有不同的调节作用。

Alpha rhythm of electroencephalography was modulated differently by three transcranial direct current stimulation protocols in patients with ischemic stroke.

作者信息

Chen Yuanyuan, Wang Chunfang, Song Peiqing, Sun Changcheng, Zhang Ying, Zhao Xin, Du Jingang

机构信息

Tianjin International Joint Research Center for Neural Engineering, Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tianjin Union Medical Centre, Rehabilitation Medical Research Center of Tianjin, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jul 15;16:887849. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.887849. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

The heterogeneity of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocols and clinical profiles may explain variable results in modulating excitability in the motor cortex after stroke. However, the cortical electrical effects induced by different tDCS protocols remain unclear. Here, we aimed to compare rhythm changes in electroencephalography (EEG) induced by three tDCS position protocols and the association between tDCS effects and clinical factors in stroke. Nineteen patients with chronic ischemic stroke underwent four experimental sessions with three tDCS protocols [anodal (atDCS), cathodal (ctDCS), and bilateral (bi-tDCS)] and a sham protocol, according to a single-blind randomized crossover design. Resting-state EEG was acquired before and after each protocol. First, a paired-sample -test was used to examine the difference in spectral power between pre- and post-stimulation. Then, linear and quadratic regression models were used separately to describe the association between the clinical factors of stroke and changes in spectral power which was significantly different between pre- and post-tDCS. Finally, repeated measures analysis of variance with lesion hemisphere, stimulation protocol, and the location was performed to investigate the effects of tDCS over time. The induced effect of tDCS was mainly reflected in the alpha rhythms. The alpha power was increased by atDCS, especially low-alpha (8-10 Hz), in localized areas of the central and distant areas of the frontal and parietal lobes. Bi-tDCS also affected alpha power but in a smaller area that mainly focused on high-alpha rhythms (10-13 Hz). However, ctDCS and sham had no significant effects on any EEG rhythm. The clinical factors of time since stroke and motor impairment level were related to the change in high-alpha induced by atDCS and bi-tDCS following quadratic regression models. The above-mentioned modulation effect lasted for 20 min without attenuation. In conclusion, our findings provide evidence that the alpha rhythm of EEG is modulated differently by different tDCS protocols and that high alpha is affected by clinical characteristics such as post-stroke time and motor deficits, which is of great significance for understanding the modulation effect of different tDCS protocols on stroke and the guidance of protocols to promote motor recovery following stroke.

摘要

经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)方案和临床特征的异质性可能解释了中风后运动皮层兴奋性调节结果的差异。然而,不同tDCS方案所诱导的皮层电效应仍不清楚。在此,我们旨在比较三种tDCS位置方案所诱导的脑电图(EEG)节律变化以及tDCS效应与中风临床因素之间的关联。19例慢性缺血性中风患者按照单盲随机交叉设计,接受了四个实验阶段,采用三种tDCS方案[阳极(atDCS)、阴极(ctDCS)和双侧(bi-tDCS)]以及一个假刺激方案。在每个方案前后采集静息态EEG。首先,使用配对样本t检验来检查刺激前后频谱功率的差异。然后,分别使用线性和二次回归模型来描述中风临床因素与tDCS前后显著不同的频谱功率变化之间的关联。最后,进行具有病变半球、刺激方案和位置的重复测量方差分析,以研究tDCS随时间的效应。tDCS的诱导效应主要体现在α节律上。atDCS使α功率增加,尤其是低α(8 - 10Hz),在中央局部区域以及额叶和顶叶的远处区域。Bi-tDCS也影响α功率,但作用区域较小,主要集中在高α节律(10 - 13Hz)。然而,ctDCS和假刺激对任何EEG节律均无显著影响。根据二次回归模型,中风后的时间和运动障碍水平等临床因素与atDCS和bi-tDCS所诱导的高α变化有关。上述调节效应持续20分钟且无衰减。总之,我们的研究结果提供了证据,表明不同的tDCS方案对EEG的α节律有不同的调节作用,并且高α受中风后时间和运动缺陷等临床特征的影响,这对于理解不同tDCS方案对中风的调节作用以及指导促进中风后运动恢复的方案具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/288a/9334563/7162218c7845/fnhum-16-887849-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验