• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

输卵管切除术、输卵管结扎术及宫腔镜下绝育封堵术。

Salpingectomy, tubal ligation and hysteroscopic occlusion for sterilization.

作者信息

Marchand Greg J, Masoud Ahmed T, King Alexa K, Brazil Giovanna M, Ulibarri Hollie M, Parise Julia E, Arroyo Amanda L, Coriell Catherine L, Goetz Sydnee P, Moir Carmen J, Govindan Malini L

机构信息

Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa, AZ, USA -

Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Minerva Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Oct;74(5):452-461. doi: 10.23736/S2724-606X.22.05134-X. Epub 2022 Aug 1.

DOI:10.23736/S2724-606X.22.05134-X
PMID:35912465
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Sterilization of females is considered one of the most prevalent contraceptive techniques among women in the United States. There are many surgical sterilization procedures including salpingectomy, tubal ligation, and hysteroscopic occlusion of the fallopian tubes. We provide an overview of these methods from the clinical data and latest studies available on this topic.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

In order to review the latest literature on the topic, we searched electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane library for all eligible studies from May 1st 2018 until May 1st 2022 using the following strategy: ("fallopian tube removal" OR Salpingectomy OR "fallopian tube excision" OR "tubal sterilization") AND ("tubal ligation" OR "bipolar coagulation" OR "tubal clip" OR "tubal ring" OR fimbriectomy). We reviewed every study that met our criteria and subjectively considered their results and methodology into this narrative review.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

In addition to reviewing major guidelines in the United States, 19 recent studies met our eligibility criteria and were included in this review. We grouped the findings under the following headings: anatomical and physiological considerations, sterilization, salpingectomy, tubal ligation, and hysteroscopic tubal occlusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral salpingectomy and techniques of tubal ligation or occlusion continue to be effective procedures with good safety profiles. All techniques have similar surgical outcomes and long-term success rates. As salpingectomy has the advantage of reducing the risk of occurrence of ovarian cancer, this is preferential when feasible. Hysteroscopic occlusion techniques may be more minimally invasive but have the disadvantages of delayed efficacy, the need for a second invasive diagnostic procedure, and limited availability.

摘要

引言

在美国,女性绝育被认为是最普遍的避孕技术之一。有许多外科绝育手术,包括输卵管切除术、输卵管结扎术和宫腔镜下输卵管阻塞术。我们根据关于该主题的临床数据和最新研究对这些方法进行概述。

证据获取

为了回顾该主题的最新文献,我们使用以下策略在包括PubMed、科学网、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆在内的电子数据库中搜索了2018年5月1日至2022年5月1日期间所有符合条件的研究:(“输卵管切除”或输卵管切除术或“输卵管切除”或“输卵管绝育”)以及(“输卵管结扎”或“双极电凝”或“输卵管夹”或“输卵管环”或输卵管伞端切除术)。我们审查了每项符合我们标准的研究,并在本叙述性综述中主观地考虑了它们的结果和方法。

证据综合

除了审查美国的主要指南外,19项近期研究符合我们的纳入标准并被纳入本综述。我们将研究结果归纳在以下标题下:解剖学和生理学考虑、绝育、输卵管切除术、输卵管结扎术和宫腔镜下输卵管阻塞术。

结论

双侧输卵管切除术以及输卵管结扎或阻塞技术仍然是安全有效的手术。所有技术都有相似的手术结果和长期成功率。由于输卵管切除术具有降低卵巢癌发生风险的优势,在可行的情况下这是首选。宫腔镜下阻塞技术可能创伤更小,但有疗效延迟、需要进行第二次侵入性诊断程序以及可用性有限的缺点。

相似文献

1
Salpingectomy, tubal ligation and hysteroscopic occlusion for sterilization.输卵管切除术、输卵管结扎术及宫腔镜下绝育封堵术。
Minerva Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Oct;74(5):452-461. doi: 10.23736/S2724-606X.22.05134-X. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
2
Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization: an evidence-based analysis.宫腔镜输卵管绝育术:基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2013 Oct 1;13(21):1-35. eCollection 2013.
3
Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy vs tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery.剖宫产时行随机输卵管切除术与输卵管结扎术的成本效益比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;220(1):106.e1-106.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.08.032. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
4
Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation.女性绝育术中输卵管通畅性阻断技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 5;2016(8):CD003034. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003034.pub4.
5
Postpartum Permanent Sterilization: Could Bilateral Salpingectomy Replace Bilateral Tubal Ligation?产后永久性绝育:双侧输卵管切除术能否取代双侧输卵管结扎术?
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Sep-Oct;23(6):928-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 May 24.
6
The Role of Opportunistic Bilateral Salpingectomy vs Tubal Occlusion or Ligation for Ovarian Cancer Prophylaxis.机会性双侧输卵管切除术与输卵管阻塞或结扎在预防卵巢癌中的作用。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Mar-Apr;24(3):371-378. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
7
Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation.女性绝育术中输卵管通畅性阻断技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 7(9):CD003034. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003034.pub3.
8
Comparing options for females seeking permanent contraception in high resource countries: a systematic review.高资源国家中寻求永久避孕的女性的选择比较:一项系统综述
Reprod Health. 2021 Jul 20;18(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01201-z.
9
Hysteroscopic proximal tubal occlusion versus laparoscopic salpingectomy as a treatment for hydrosalpinges prior to IVF or ICSI: an RCT.宫腔镜近端输卵管阻塞术与腹腔镜输卵管切除术作为体外受精或卵胞浆内单精子注射术前输卵管积水的治疗方法:一项随机对照试验
Hum Reprod. 2016 Sep;31(9):2005-16. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew050. Epub 2016 May 21.
10
Tubal Sterilization输卵管绝育术

引用本文的文献

1
Two Consecutive Ruptured Tubal Ectopic Pregnancies after Interval Bilateral Tubal Ligation.双侧输卵管结扎术后间隔期连续发生两次输卵管妊娠破裂
Int Med Case Rep J. 2024 May 8;17:417-421. doi: 10.2147/IMCRJ.S463007. eCollection 2024.