Suppr超能文献

输卵管切除术、输卵管结扎术及宫腔镜下绝育封堵术。

Salpingectomy, tubal ligation and hysteroscopic occlusion for sterilization.

作者信息

Marchand Greg J, Masoud Ahmed T, King Alexa K, Brazil Giovanna M, Ulibarri Hollie M, Parise Julia E, Arroyo Amanda L, Coriell Catherine L, Goetz Sydnee P, Moir Carmen J, Govindan Malini L

机构信息

Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa, AZ, USA -

Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Minerva Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Oct;74(5):452-461. doi: 10.23736/S2724-606X.22.05134-X. Epub 2022 Aug 1.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Sterilization of females is considered one of the most prevalent contraceptive techniques among women in the United States. There are many surgical sterilization procedures including salpingectomy, tubal ligation, and hysteroscopic occlusion of the fallopian tubes. We provide an overview of these methods from the clinical data and latest studies available on this topic.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

In order to review the latest literature on the topic, we searched electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane library for all eligible studies from May 1st 2018 until May 1st 2022 using the following strategy: ("fallopian tube removal" OR Salpingectomy OR "fallopian tube excision" OR "tubal sterilization") AND ("tubal ligation" OR "bipolar coagulation" OR "tubal clip" OR "tubal ring" OR fimbriectomy). We reviewed every study that met our criteria and subjectively considered their results and methodology into this narrative review.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

In addition to reviewing major guidelines in the United States, 19 recent studies met our eligibility criteria and were included in this review. We grouped the findings under the following headings: anatomical and physiological considerations, sterilization, salpingectomy, tubal ligation, and hysteroscopic tubal occlusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral salpingectomy and techniques of tubal ligation or occlusion continue to be effective procedures with good safety profiles. All techniques have similar surgical outcomes and long-term success rates. As salpingectomy has the advantage of reducing the risk of occurrence of ovarian cancer, this is preferential when feasible. Hysteroscopic occlusion techniques may be more minimally invasive but have the disadvantages of delayed efficacy, the need for a second invasive diagnostic procedure, and limited availability.

摘要

引言

在美国,女性绝育被认为是最普遍的避孕技术之一。有许多外科绝育手术,包括输卵管切除术、输卵管结扎术和宫腔镜下输卵管阻塞术。我们根据关于该主题的临床数据和最新研究对这些方法进行概述。

证据获取

为了回顾该主题的最新文献,我们使用以下策略在包括PubMed、科学网、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆在内的电子数据库中搜索了2018年5月1日至2022年5月1日期间所有符合条件的研究:(“输卵管切除”或输卵管切除术或“输卵管切除”或“输卵管绝育”)以及(“输卵管结扎”或“双极电凝”或“输卵管夹”或“输卵管环”或输卵管伞端切除术)。我们审查了每项符合我们标准的研究,并在本叙述性综述中主观地考虑了它们的结果和方法。

证据综合

除了审查美国的主要指南外,19项近期研究符合我们的纳入标准并被纳入本综述。我们将研究结果归纳在以下标题下:解剖学和生理学考虑、绝育、输卵管切除术、输卵管结扎术和宫腔镜下输卵管阻塞术。

结论

双侧输卵管切除术以及输卵管结扎或阻塞技术仍然是安全有效的手术。所有技术都有相似的手术结果和长期成功率。由于输卵管切除术具有降低卵巢癌发生风险的优势,在可行的情况下这是首选。宫腔镜下阻塞技术可能创伤更小,但有疗效延迟、需要进行第二次侵入性诊断程序以及可用性有限的缺点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验