Suppr超能文献

深挖根源:附加实验室失败案例报告及解决办法。

Dig Deeper: A Case Report of Finding (and Fixing) the Root Cause of Add-On Laboratory Failures.

机构信息

Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States.

Division of Hospital Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States.

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Aug;13(4):874-879. doi: 10.1055/a-1913-4158. Epub 2022 Jul 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Venipunctures and the testing they facilitate are clinically necessary, particularly for hospitalized patients. However, excess venipunctures lead to patient harm, decreased patient satisfaction, and waste.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to identify contributors to excess venipunctures at our institution, focusing on electronic health record (EHR)-related factors. We then implemented and evaluated the impact of an intervention targeting one of the contributing factors.

METHODS

We employed the quality improvement (QI) methodology to find sources of excess venipunctures, specifically targeting add-on failures. Once an error was identified, we deployed an EHR-based intervention which was evaluated with retrospective pre- and postintervention analysis.

RESULTS

We identified an error in how the EHR evaluated the ability of laboratories across a health system to perform add-on tests to existing blood specimens. A review of 195,263 add-on orders placed prior to the intervention showed that 165,118 were successful and 30,145 failed, a failure rate of 15.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.1-15.6). We implemented an EHR-based modification that changed the criteria for add-on testing from a health-system-wide query of laboratory capabilities to one that incorporated only the capabilities of laboratories with feasible access to existing patient samples. In the 6 months following the intervention, a review of 87,333 add-on orders showed that 77,310 were successful, and 10,023 add-on orders failed resulting in a postintervention failure rate of 11.4% (95% CI: 11.1, 11.8) ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

EHR features such as the ability to identify possible add-on tests are designed to reduce venipunctures but may produce unforeseen negative effects on downstream processes, particularly as hospitals merge into health systems using a single EHR. This case report describes the successful identification and correction of one cause of add-on laboratory failures. QI methodology can yield important insights that reveal simple interventions for improvement.

摘要

背景

静脉穿刺术及其所促成的检测在临床上是必要的,尤其是对住院患者而言。然而,过度的静脉穿刺术会导致患者受到伤害,降低患者满意度,并造成浪费。

目的

我们旨在确定我院静脉穿刺术过多的原因,重点关注电子病历(EHR)相关因素。然后,我们针对一个促成因素实施并评估了干预措施的效果。

方法

我们采用质量改进(QI)方法来寻找静脉穿刺术过多的源头,特别是针对附加测试失败的情况。一旦发现错误,我们就会部署基于 EHR 的干预措施,并通过回顾性的干预前后分析来评估其效果。

结果

我们发现 EHR 评估整个医疗系统实验室进行现有血液标本附加测试能力的方式存在错误。对干预前进行的 195263 次附加订单的回顾显示,其中 165118 次成功,30145 次失败,失败率为 15.4%(95%置信区间[CI]:15.1-15.6)。我们实施了一项基于 EHR 的修改,将附加测试的标准从对实验室能力的全系统查询更改为仅纳入对现有患者样本具有可行访问权限的实验室的能力。在干预后的 6 个月内,对 87333 次附加订单的审查显示,其中 77310 次成功,10023 次附加订单失败,因此干预后的失败率为 11.4%(95%CI:11.1,11.8)( < 0.001)。

结论

EHR 的某些功能,如识别可能的附加测试的能力,旨在减少静脉穿刺术,但可能对下游流程产生意想不到的负面影响,特别是在医院合并为使用单个 EHR 的医疗系统时。本病例报告描述了成功识别和纠正附加实验室失败的一个原因。QI 方法可以提供重要的见解,从而揭示简单的改进干预措施。

相似文献

4
Adult patient access to electronic health records.成年患者获取电子健康记录。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 26;2(2):CD012707. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012707.pub2.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验