Giacobbe Daniele Roberto, Di Bella Stefano, Lovecchio Antonio, Ball Lorenzo, De Maria Andrea, Vena Antonio, Bruzzone Bianca, Icardi Giancarlo, Pelosi Paolo, Luzzati Roberto, Bassetti Matteo
Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Via A. Pastore 1, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
Infectious Diseases Unit, San Martino Policlinico Hospital-IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy.
Infect Dis Ther. 2022 Oct;11(5):1779-1791. doi: 10.1007/s40121-022-00674-0. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
Systemic or pulmonary reactivations of herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) have been reported in critically ill patients with COVID-19, posing a dilemma for clinicians in terms of their diagnostic and clinical relevance. Prevalence of HSV-1 reactivation may be as high as > 40% in this population, but with large heterogeneity across studies, likely reflecting the different samples and/or cut-offs for defining reactivation. There is frequently agreement on the clinical significance of HSV-1 reactivation in the presence of severe manifestations clearly attributable to the virus. However, the clinical implications of HSV-1 reactivations in the absence of manifest signs and symptoms remain controversial. Our review aims at providing immunological background and at reviewing clinical findings on HSV-1 reactivations in critically ill patients with COVID-19.
据报道,在患有新冠肺炎的重症患者中,单纯疱疹病毒1型(HSV-1)会出现全身或肺部重新激活,这给临床医生在其诊断和临床相关性方面带来了两难境地。在这一人群中,HSV-1重新激活的发生率可能高达40%以上,但不同研究之间存在很大异质性,这可能反映了定义重新激活的样本和/或临界值不同。在存在明确可归因于该病毒的严重表现时,对于HSV-1重新激活的临床意义,人们常常达成共识。然而,在没有明显体征和症状的情况下,HSV-1重新激活的临床意义仍存在争议。我们的综述旨在提供免疫学背景,并回顾新冠肺炎重症患者中HSV-1重新激活的临床研究结果。