• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

空气堆积法作为限制性肺疾病患者肺扩张治疗的标准化:一项初步研究。

Standardization of Air Stacking as Lung Expansion Therapy for Patients With Restrictive Lung Disease: A Pilot Study.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Rehabilitation Institute of Neuromuscular Disease, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Biorobotics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Phys Ther. 2022 Sep 4;102(9). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzac092.

DOI:10.1093/ptj/pzac092
PMID:35913796
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although air stacking is a widely used lung expansion therapy essential for restrictive lung diseases, important details such as peak insufflation pressure (PIP) and number of squeezes have not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to standardize a method of air stacking to minimize problems with its application by identifying the optimal pressure and number of squeezes performed by professional physicians and investigating the current status of routine air stacking implementation in patients.

METHODS

This prospective cross-sectional test-retest study involved individuals who had neuromuscular disorders and had performed air stacking exercise for longer than 1 year. PIP and number of squeezes were measured to identify the differences between caregivers and physicians. Cases of incorrectly performed air stacking were investigated and categorized. The problems associated with air stacking were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 45 participants were included. PIP was 41.4 (SD = 4.2; range = 34.8-50.0) cm H2O, and optimal number of squeezes was 3.1 (SD = 0.5; range = 2-4). When the air stacking methods used by caregivers were evaluated, 19 of 45 caregivers (42.2%) used methods inappropriately. Higher PIP and larger number of squeezes were observed with caregiver implementation. Thirty caregivers (66.7%) experienced finger or wrist pain; this problem was observed especially in female caregivers, who tended to incorrectly perform air stacking.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study showed that the optimal pressure of air stacking was 35 to 50 cm H2O. Caregivers often perform air stacking inappropriately, leading to complications without achieving the purpose of air stacking. The introduction of a new method, such as manometry, can be helpful for achieving optimal air stacking.

IMPACT

Optimal pressure of air stacking can be measured with inexpensive, simple, and commercially available digital manometry. This approach enables air stacking to be performed and taught more accurately and efficiently and reduces complications in both patients and caregivers.

摘要

目的

尽管空气堆叠是一种广泛应用于限制性肺部疾病的肺部扩张治疗方法,但重要细节,如峰压(PIP)和挤压次数等,尚未得到研究。本研究的目的是标准化空气堆叠的方法,通过确定专业医生进行的最佳压力和挤压次数,并调查患者常规空气堆叠实施的现状,最大限度地减少其应用中的问题。

方法

这是一项前瞻性的横断面测试-再测试研究,涉及患有神经肌肉疾病且进行空气堆叠运动超过 1 年的个体。测量 PIP 和挤压次数,以确定护理人员和医生之间的差异。调查并分类不正确执行空气堆叠的情况。评估与空气堆叠相关的问题。

结果

共纳入 45 名参与者。PIP 为 41.4(SD=4.2;范围=34.8-50.0)cm H2O,最佳挤压次数为 3.1(SD=0.5;范围=2-4)。当评估护理人员使用的空气堆叠方法时,45 名护理人员中有 19 名(42.2%)使用方法不当。在护理人员实施过程中观察到更高的 PIP 和更多的挤压次数。30 名护理人员(66.7%)出现手指或手腕疼痛;在女性护理人员中尤其观察到这个问题,她们往往不正确地进行空气堆叠。

结论

这项初步研究表明,空气堆叠的最佳压力为 35 至 50 cm H2O。护理人员经常不恰当地进行空气堆叠,导致并发症而未能达到空气堆叠的目的。引入新的方法,如测压法,可能有助于实现最佳的空气堆叠。

影响

空气堆叠的最佳压力可以使用廉价、简单且市售的数字测压法进行测量。这种方法使空气堆叠能够更准确和高效地进行和教学,减少患者和护理人员的并发症。

相似文献

1
Standardization of Air Stacking as Lung Expansion Therapy for Patients With Restrictive Lung Disease: A Pilot Study.空气堆积法作为限制性肺疾病患者肺扩张治疗的标准化:一项初步研究。
Phys Ther. 2022 Sep 4;102(9). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzac092.
2
Cough Augmentation in Subjects With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Comparison of Air Stacking via a Resuscitator Bag Versus Mechanical Ventilation.杜氏肌营养不良症患者的咳嗽增强:通过复苏袋进行气叠加与机械通气的比较
Respir Care. 2016 Jan;61(1):61-7. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04033. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
3
Lung inflation by glossopharyngeal breathing and "air stacking" in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.杜氏肌营养不良症中通过舌咽呼吸和“空气堆积”实现的肺充气
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Apr;86(4):295-300. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318038d1ce.
4
Individualized PEEP to optimise respiratory mechanics during abdominal surgery: a pilot randomised controlled trial.个体化呼气末正压通气优化腹部手术期间的呼吸力学:一项先导随机对照试验。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Sep;125(3):383-392. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.030. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
5
Air stacking: effects on pulmonary function in patients with spinal muscular atrophy and in patients with congenital muscular dystrophy.空气堆积法:对脊髓性肌萎缩症患者和先天性肌营养不良症患者肺功能的影响
J Bras Pneumol. 2014 Oct;40(5):528-34. doi: 10.1590/s1806-37132014000500009.
6
Neonatal Pneumothorax Pressures Surpass Higher Threshold in Lung Recruitment Maneuvers: An In Vivo Interventional Study.新生儿气胸在肺复张操作中压力超过更高阈值:一项体内干预研究。
Respir Care. 2016 Feb;61(2):142-8. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04250. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
7
Lung insufflation capacity in neuromuscular disease.神经肌肉疾病中的肺充气能力。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Sep;87(9):720-5. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31817fb26f.
8
Cough peak flow with different mechanically assisted coughing approaches under different conditions in patients with neuromuscular disorders.神经肌肉疾病患者在不同条件下采用不同机械辅助咳嗽方法时的咳嗽峰流速。
Phys Ther Res. 2019 Jun 7;22(2):58-65. doi: 10.1298/ptr.E9978. eCollection 2019.
9
The London low emission zone baseline study.伦敦低排放区基线研究。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2011 Nov(163):3-79.
10
Effect of active pulmonary rehabilitation on pulmonary function in patients with brain lesion.主动肺康复对脑损伤患者肺功能的影响。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;35(3):459-66. doi: 10.3233/NRE-141137.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Airstacking and Digital Pressure Feedback on Pulmonary Function in Restrictive Lung Disease: A Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial.气流叠加和数字压力反馈对限制性肺疾病肺功能的影响:一项分层随机对照试验
Biomedicines. 2025 Mar 3;13(3):616. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13030616.