Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care-Research Centre (ANZIC-RC), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 1;17(8):e0272373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272373. eCollection 2022.
Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients frequently require mechanical ventilation (MV) and undergo prolonged periods of bed rest with restriction of activities during the intensive care unit (ICU) stay. Our aim was to address the degree of mobilization in critically ill patients with COVID-19 undergoing to MV support.
Retrospective single-center cohort study. We analyzed patients' mobility level, through the Perme ICU Mobility Score (Perme Score) of COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU. The Perme Mobility Index (PMI) was calculated [PMI = ΔPerme Score (ICU discharge-ICU admission)/ICU length of stay], and patients were categorized as "improved" (PMI > 0) or "not improved" (PMI ≤ 0). Comparisons were performed with stratification according to the use of MV support.
From February 2020, to February 2021, 1,297 patients with COVID-19 were admitted to the ICU and assessed for eligibility. Out of those, 949 patients were included in the study [524 (55.2%) were classified as "improved" and 425 (44.8%) as "not improved"], and 396 (41.7%) received MV during ICU stay. The overall rate of patients out of bed and able to walk ≥ 30 meters at ICU discharge were, respectively, 526 (63.3%) and 170 (20.5%). After adjusting for confounders, independent predictors of improvement of mobility level were frailty (OR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.29-0.94; p = 0.03); SAPS III Score (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.57-0.99; p = 0.04); SOFA Score (OR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.43-0.78; p < 0.001); use of MV after the first hour of ICU admission (OR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.17-0.99; p = 0.04); tracheostomy (OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.30-0.95; p = 0.03); use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (OR: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.05-0.8; p = 0.03); neuromuscular blockade (OR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.3-0.95; p = 0.03); a higher Perme Score at admission (OR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.28-0.43; p < 0.001); palliative care (OR: 0.05; 95% CI: 0.01-0.16; p < 0.001); and a longer ICU stay (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.61-0.97; p = 0.04) were associated with a lower chance of mobility improvement, while non-invasive ventilation within the first hour of ICU admission and after the first hour of ICU admission (OR: 2.45; 95% CI: 1.59-3.81; p < 0.001) and (OR: 2.25; 95% CI: 1.56-3.26; p < 0.001), respectively; and vasopressor use (OR: 2.39; 95% CI: 1.07-5.5; p = 0.03) were associated with a higher chance of mobility improvement.
The use of MV reduced mobility status in less than half of critically ill COVID-19 patients.
严重的 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者经常需要机械通气(MV),并在重症监护病房(ICU)住院期间长时间卧床休息,限制活动。我们的目的是探讨 COVID-19 患者接受 MV 支持的严重程度。
回顾性单中心队列研究。我们通过 ICU 入住时的 Perme ICU 活动评分(Perme 评分)来分析患者的活动能力。计算 Perme 活动指数(PMI)[PMI=ΔPerme 评分(ICU 出院-ICU 入院)/ICU 住院时间],并根据 PMI 值将患者分为“改善”(PMI>0)或“未改善”(PMI≤0)。根据 MV 支持的使用进行分层比较。
从 2020 年 2 月至 2021 年 2 月,共有 1297 例 COVID-19 患者入住 ICU 并进行了资格评估。其中 949 例患者被纳入研究[524 例(55.2%)被归类为“改善”,425 例(44.8%)为“未改善”],396 例(41.7%)患者在 ICU 期间接受了 MV。ICU 出院时下床并能行走≥30 米的患者比例分别为 526 例(63.3%)和 170 例(20.5%)。调整混杂因素后,活动能力改善的独立预测因素包括虚弱(OR:0.52;95%CI:0.29-0.94;p=0.03);SAPS III 评分(OR:0.75;95%CI:0.57-0.99;p=0.04);SOFA 评分(OR:0.58;95%CI:0.43-0.78;p<0.001);ICU 入院后 1 小时内使用 MV(OR:0.41;95%CI:0.17-0.99;p=0.04);气管切开术(OR:0.54;95%CI:0.30-0.95;p=0.03);体外膜氧合(OR:0.21;95%CI:0.05-0.8;p=0.03);神经肌肉阻滞剂(OR:0.53;95%CI:0.3-0.95;p=0.03);较高的 Perme 评分(OR:0.35;95%CI:0.28-0.43;p<0.001);姑息治疗(OR:0.05;95%CI:0.01-0.16;p<0.001);ICU 住院时间较长(OR:0.79;95%CI:0.61-0.97;p=0.04)与活动能力改善的可能性降低相关,而 ICU 入住后 1 小时内和 ICU 入住后 1 小时内的无创通气(OR:2.45;95%CI:1.59-3.81;p<0.001)和(OR:2.25;95%CI:1.56-3.26;p<0.001),以及血管加压素的使用(OR:2.39;95%CI:1.07-5.5;p=0.03)与活动能力改善的可能性增加相关。
MV 的使用降低了不到一半 COVID-19 重症患者的活动能力。