Kim Min Chong, Park Min Hui, Choi Jung Eun, Kang Su Hwan, Bae Young Kyung
Department of Pathology, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Department of Surgery, Breast Cancer Center, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
J Breast Cancer. 2022 Aug;25(4):318-326. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2022.25.e31. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
The updated American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline for estrogen receptor (ER) testing recommends that breast cancer with ER expression in 1-10% of tumor cells should be reported as ER-low positive (ER), although limited data are available on the overall benefits of endocrine therapy. We investigated the clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes of ER breast cancer and to compare them with those of ER-negative (ER) and ER-high (> 10% of tumor cells, ER) breast cancers.
Consecutive patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent curative surgery between November 2007 and December 2014 were included. Clinicopathological characteristics and disease-free survival (DFS) of ER tumors were compared with those of ER and ER tumors.
Of the 2,309 cases included, 46 (2%), 643 (27.8%), and 1,620 (70.2%) were ER, ER, and ER, respectively. ER tumors were associated with no special type of histology ( = 0.011), advanced pT ( = 0.017), pN ( = 0.009) and anatomic stages ( < 0.001), high grade ( < 0.001), negative/low progesterone receptor (PR) status ( < 0.001), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positivity ( < 0.001), high Ki-67 ( < 0.001), and recurrence ( = 0.006) compared to ER tumors. DFS was significantly dependent on ER status, and ER tumors showed poorer DFS than ER tumors ( = 0.001), however, there was no significant survival difference between ER and ER tumors. Furthermore, DFS in ER patients was affected by hormone therapy ( < 0.001), while it was not affected in ER patients.
Patients with ER breast cancer have clinicopathological characteristics that differ from those with ER tumors. Although this study was limited by the small sample size of the ER group, no benefit from hormone therapy was observed in the ER group compared with the ER group.
美国临床肿瘤学会/美国病理学家协会更新的雌激素受体(ER)检测指南建议,肿瘤细胞中ER表达为1%-10%的乳腺癌应报告为ER低阳性(ER低阳),尽管关于内分泌治疗总体获益的数据有限。我们研究了ER低阳乳腺癌的临床病理特征和临床结局,并将其与ER阴性(ER阴)和ER高表达(>10%肿瘤细胞,ER高阳)乳腺癌的特征和结局进行比较。
纳入2007年11月至2014年12月间接受根治性手术的连续性浸润性乳腺癌患者。将ER低阳肿瘤的临床病理特征和无病生存期(DFS)与ER阴和ER高阳肿瘤进行比较。
在纳入的2309例病例中,分别有46例(2%)为ER低阳、643例(27.8%)为ER阴和1620例(70.2%)为ER高阳。与ER高阳肿瘤相比,ER低阳肿瘤与特殊组织学类型无关(P = 0.011)、pT分期较晚(P = 0.017)、pN分期较晚(P = 0.009)、解剖学分期较晚(P < 0.001)、高级别(P < 0.001)、孕激素受体(PR)阴性/低表达状态(P < 0.001)、人表皮生长因子受体2阳性(P < 0.001)、Ki-67高表达(P < 0.001)及复发(P = 0.006)相关。DFS显著依赖于ER状态,ER低阳肿瘤的DFS比ER高阳肿瘤差(P = 0.001),然而,ER阴和ER高阳肿瘤之间无显著生存差异。此外,ER低阳患者的DFS受激素治疗影响(P < 0.001),而ER阴患者不受影响。
ER低阳乳腺癌患者具有与ER阴肿瘤患者不同的临床病理特征。尽管本研究受ER低阳组样本量小的限制,但与ER高阳组相比,未观察到ER低阳组从激素治疗中获益。