Suppr超能文献

现代新辅助化疗治疗乳腺癌的局部区域复发和生存结局:一项基于当代人群的分析。

Locoregional Recurrence and Survival Outcomes in Breast Cancer Treated With Modern Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Contemporary Population-based Analysis.

机构信息

BC Cancer - Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Breast Cancer. 2022 Oct;22(7):e773-e787. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.07.003. Epub 2022 Jul 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data guiding radiotherapy (RT) decisions after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is largely retrospective, based on older treatment approaches without molecular subtype information. This study evaluated outcomes in breast cancer patients treated with modern NAC by molecular subtype and locoregional treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

There were 949 patients diagnosed between 2005 and 2016 treated with NAC followed by surgery ± locoregional radiotherapy (LRRT). Outcomes were 7-year locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 6.5 years, 92% had cT2-4 and 72% cN1-3 disease. Subtypes were: 21% Luminal A, 18% Luminal B, 35% Her2+, and 21% triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Combined taxane and anthracycline-based NAC was used in 91.7% of cases. All patients with Her2+ disease received anti-Her2 therapy. After NAC, the majority (84.9%) underwent mastectomy, and received LRRT (86.1%). Only 11% had mastectomy without RT. Pathologic complete response (pCR) rates were 2.5% for Luminal A, 14.4% Luminal B, 27% TNBC, and 35.1% Her2+. Overall, adjuvant LRRT was associated with improved outcomes but was most significant for improved LRRFS in TNBC (92.5% vs. 68.5%, P < .001; Her2+ 95.4% vs. 93.6%, P = .81; Luminal A 97.4% vs. 100%, P = .49; Luminal B 89.7% vs. 100%, P = .17). On multivariable analysis, factors associated with reduced LRRFS were grade 3 histology (HR 4.96, P = .009) and no pCR (HR 7.0, P = .0008). Predictors of lower BCSS and OS were age >50, grade 3, cT3-4, lack of pCR, LRRT omission, and TNBC and Her2+ subtypes.

CONCLUSION

In this analysis of patients treated with modern NAC, pCR rates varied by molecular subtype. Patients who did not receive LRRT, particularly those with TNBC, had lower survival compared to those treated with LRRT. These findings support the need for prospective studies to evaluate the safety of de-escalating RT after NAC.

摘要

背景

新辅助化疗(NAC)后指导放疗(RT)决策的数据主要是回顾性的,基于没有分子亚型信息的较老治疗方法。本研究按分子亚型和局部区域治疗评估接受现代 NAC 治疗的乳腺癌患者的结局。

材料和方法

949 例 2005 年至 2016 年间诊断为 NAC 后行手术±局部区域放疗(LRRT)的患者。结局为 7 年局部区域无复发生存率(LRRFS)、乳腺癌特异性生存率(BCSS)和总生存率(OS)。

结果

中位随访时间为 6.5 年,92%为 cT2-4,72%为 cN1-3。亚型为:21% Luminal A、18% Luminal B、35% Her2+和 21%三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)。91.7%的病例采用联合紫杉烷和蒽环类药物的 NAC。所有 Her2+疾病患者均接受抗 Her2 治疗。NAC 后,大多数(84.9%)患者行乳房切除术,并接受 LRRT(86.1%)。仅有 11%的患者行乳房切除术而未行放疗。Luminal A 的病理完全缓解(pCR)率为 2.5%,Luminal B 为 14.4%,TNBC 为 27%,Her2+为 35.1%。总体而言,辅助 LRRT 改善了结局,但在 TNBC 中对 LRRFS 的改善最显著(92.5% vs. 68.5%,P <.001;Her2+ 95.4% vs. 93.6%,P =.81;Luminal A 97.4% vs. 100%,P =.49;Luminal B 89.7% vs. 100%,P =.17)。多变量分析显示,与 LRRFS 降低相关的因素包括 3 级组织学(HR 4.96,P =.009)和无 pCR(HR 7.0,P =.0008)。BCSS 和 OS 降低的预测因素包括年龄>50 岁、3 级、cT3-4、无 pCR、LRRT 遗漏以及 TNBC 和 Her2+亚型。

结论

在这项接受现代 NAC 治疗的患者分析中,pCR 率按分子亚型而异。未接受 LRRT 的患者,特别是接受 TNBC 治疗的患者,与接受 LRRT 的患者相比,生存率较低。这些发现支持需要前瞻性研究来评估 NAC 后降低 RT 强度的安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验