• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分子亚型作为新辅助治疗乳腺癌局部和远处复发的预测指标。

Molecular class as a predictor of locoregional and distant recurrence in the neoadjuvant setting for breast cancer.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 300 Halket Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

出版信息

Oncology. 2011;80(5-6):341-9. doi: 10.1159/000330203. Epub 2011 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1159/000330203
PMID:21791944
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The molecular subtype by hormone receptor status predicts recurrence in the adjuvant setting. Here, we report recurrence patterns by molecular subtype following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) to identify subgroups prone to recurrence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 331 patients receiving NACT plus lumpectomy and whole breast radiation therapy (RT) (n = 155), or mastectomy with (n = 122) or without (n = 50) adjuvant RT. Tumors were classified by immunohistochemical (IHC) surrogate markers into luminal A (strong ER+/PR+; HER2-), luminal B (weak-to-moderate ER+/PR+; HER2-), HER2 (HER2+), and triple-negative/basal subtypes.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 43 months (range 10-104). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 71.4, 70.1, 70.4, and 62.1% for luminal A, luminal B, HER2, and basal subtypes, respectively. The 5-year distant recurrence rates were 25.8, 28.7, 28.7, and 35.2%. The 5-year locoregional recurrence rates were 3.8, 1.6, 1.3, and 4.2%. Molecular class (p = 0.003) and pathologic complete response (pCR; p = 0.004) predicted distant recurrence, DFS, and overall survival (OS). Only the omission of adjuvant RT following mastectomy (p = 0.006) predicted locoregional recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

IHC subclassification and pCR predict distant failure, DFS, and OS in the neoadjuvant setting. While not predictive of locoregional recurrence, the total number of events were small. More work is needed to define if molecular class can predict patients at risk for locoregional recurrence.

摘要

背景

激素受体状态的分子亚型可预测辅助治疗中的复发。在此,我们报告新辅助化疗(NACT)后分子亚型的复发模式,以确定易复发的亚组。

材料和方法

我们回顾性分析了 331 例接受 NACT 加乳房肿瘤切除术和全乳放射治疗(RT)(n = 155)、或乳房切除术加(n = 122)或不加(n = 50)辅助 RT 的患者。肿瘤通过免疫组织化学(IHC)替代标志物分为 luminal A(强 ER+/PR+;HER2-)、luminal B(弱至中度 ER+/PR+;HER2+)、HER2(HER2+)和三阴性/基底亚型。

结果

中位随访时间为 43 个月(范围 10-104)。luminal A、luminal B、HER2 和基底亚型的 5 年无病生存率(DFS)分别为 71.4%、70.1%、70.4%和 62.1%。5 年远处复发率分别为 25.8%、28.7%、28.7%和 35.2%。5 年局部区域复发率分别为 3.8%、1.6%、1.3%和 4.2%。分子分类(p = 0.003)和病理完全缓解(pCR;p = 0.004)预测远处复发、DFS 和总生存期(OS)。只有乳房切除术时省略辅助 RT(p = 0.006)预测局部区域复发。

结论

IHC 亚分类和 pCR 预测新辅助治疗中的远处失败、DFS 和 OS。虽然不能预测局部区域复发,但总的事件数较少。需要进一步研究以确定分子分类是否可以预测局部区域复发的风险。

相似文献

1
Molecular class as a predictor of locoregional and distant recurrence in the neoadjuvant setting for breast cancer.分子亚型作为新辅助治疗乳腺癌局部和远处复发的预测指标。
Oncology. 2011;80(5-6):341-9. doi: 10.1159/000330203. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
2
[Clinical characteristics and survival in the operable breast cancer patients with different molecular subtypes].[不同分子亚型可手术乳腺癌患者的临床特征与生存情况]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2009 Jun;31(6):447-51.
3
Estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER-2, and response to postmastectomy radiotherapy in high-risk breast cancer: the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group.雌激素受体、孕激素受体、HER-2与高危乳腺癌保乳术后放疗反应:丹麦乳腺癌协作组
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 20;26(9):1419-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.5565. Epub 2008 Feb 19.
4
The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes.三阴性悖论:乳腺癌亚型的原发性肿瘤化疗敏感性
Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Apr 15;13(8):2329-34. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1109.
5
Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes.不同内在型乳腺癌亚型新辅助化疗后病理完全缓解对预后的定义和影响。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 20;30(15):1796-804. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.8595. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
6
Immunohistochemical surrogate markers of breast cancer molecular classes predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a single institutional experience with 359 cases.乳腺癌分子类型的免疫组织化学替代标志物预测新辅助化疗的反应:359 例单机构经验。
Cancer. 2010 Mar 15;116(6):1431-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24876.
7
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer: tumor markers as predictors of pathologic response, recurrence, and survival.乳腺癌新辅助化疗:肿瘤标志物预测病理反应、复发和生存。
Breast J. 2010 Jul-Aug;16(4):362-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2010.00935.x. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
8
Randomized phase 3 trial of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide alone or followed by Paclitaxel for early breast cancer.氟尿嘧啶、表柔比星和环磷酰胺单药或序贯紫杉醇用于早期乳腺癌的随机3期试验。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Jun 4;100(11):805-14. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn151. Epub 2008 May 27.
9
Prognostic significance of bcl-2 expression in stage III breast cancer patients who had received doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy.在接受多柔比星和环磷酰胺序贯紫杉醇辅助化疗的III期乳腺癌患者中,bcl-2表达的预后意义
BMC Cancer. 2007 Apr 12;7:63. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-7-63.
10
Breast cancer subtype approximations and loco-regional recurrence after immediate breast reconstruction.乳腺癌亚型分类与即刻乳房重建后局部区域复发的关系
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Mar;39(3):260-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2012.12.004. Epub 2013 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Tissue- and Temporal-Dependent Dynamics of Myeloablation in Response to Gemcitabine Chemotherapy.针对吉西他滨化疗的骨髓消融的组织和时间依赖性动态。
Cells. 2024 Aug 7;13(16):1317. doi: 10.3390/cells13161317.
2
Narrative review on the role of immunotherapy in early triple negative breast cancer: unveiling opportunities and overcoming challenges.关于免疫疗法在早期三阴性乳腺癌中作用的叙述性综述:揭示机遇与克服挑战
Transl Breast Cancer Res. 2023 Apr 30;4:16. doi: 10.21037/tbcr-23-17. eCollection 2023.
3
Value of total tumor load as a clinical and pathological factor in the prognosis of breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment. Comparison of three populations with three different surgical approaches: NEOVATTL Pro 3 Study.
总肿瘤负荷作为接受新辅助治疗的乳腺癌患者临床病理预后因素的价值。三种不同手术方式的三组人群比较:NEOVATTL Pro 3 研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jul;200(2):203-215. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-06954-8. Epub 2023 May 23.
4
Personalized ctDNA micro-panels can monitor and predict clinical outcomes for patients with triple-negative breast cancer.个体化 ctDNA 微面板可监测和预测三阴性乳腺癌患者的临床结局。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 22;12(1):17732. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20928-8.
5
Triple-negative breast cancer: current treatment strategies and factors of negative prognosis.三阴性乳腺癌:当前的治疗策略及不良预后因素
J Med Life. 2022 Feb;15(2):153-161. doi: 10.25122/jml-2021-0108.
6
Immunogenomic profiling and pathological response results from a clinical trial of docetaxel and carboplatin in triple-negative breast cancer.三阴性乳腺癌中多西他赛和卡铂的免疫基因组分析和病理反应结果的临床试验
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Aug;189(1):187-202. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06307-3. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
7
The prognostic value of node status in different breast cancer subtypes.不同乳腺癌亚型中淋巴结状态的预后价值。
Oncotarget. 2017 Jan 17;8(3):4563-4571. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13943.
8
Locoregional Recurrence by Tumor Biology in Breast Cancer Patients after Preoperative Chemotherapy and Breast Conservation Treatment.乳腺癌患者保乳术前化疗后基于肿瘤生物学的局部区域复发。
Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Oct;48(4):1363-1372. doi: 10.4143/crt.2015.456. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
9
Time-varying effect and long-term survival analysis in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.接受新辅助化疗的乳腺癌患者的时间变化效应和长期生存分析。
Br J Cancer. 2015 Jun 30;113(1):30-6. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.174. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
10
Clinico-pathological features and prognosis of invasive micropapillary carcinoma compared to invasive ductal carcinoma: a population-based study from China.浸润性微乳头状癌与浸润性导管癌的临床病理特征及预后比较:一项基于中国人群的研究
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 30;9(6):e101390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101390. eCollection 2014.