Department of Personalized Medicine and Preventive Healthcare Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan; Department of Pharmacy, Okayama University Hospital, Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan.
Department of Pharmacy, Okayama University Hospital, Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan.
Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Jan;9(1):141-144. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.07.003. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
No head-to-head postmarket surveillance study has compared the differences in adverse events (AEs) between two combination therapies, axitinib (AXI) + pembrolizumab (PEMBRO) and lenvatinib (LEN) + PEMBRO, against metastatic renal cell carcinoma. This study aims to highlight the comprehensive differences in AEs between these two therapies based on the real-world big data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. In total, 28 937 records were extracted from the FAERS database, and 139 AEs grouped into the System Organ Class according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities were analysed. Logistic regression analyses were performed, and the reporting odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval was determined. We found that the incidences of cardiac and hepatobiliary disorders for AXI + PEMBRO, and blood and lymphatic system, metabolism and nutrition, and vascular disorders for LEN + PEMBRO, all of which were associated with serious AEs, were higher than those for LEN + PEMBRO and AXI + PEMBRO, respectively. The differences in the AEs between AXI + PEMBRO and LEN + PEMBRO were not derived merely from those between AXI and LEN monotherapies. Furthermore, remarkable AE potentiation was observed for AXI + PEMBRO. As FAERS is a spontaneous reporting system comprising partially limited information, analysing more detailed relationships between AEs and patient or treatment characteristics was challenging in this study. The present study is the first to show the overall real-world postmarketing differences in AEs between AXI + PEMBRO and LEN + PEMBRO. Our novel findings will substantially improve clinical practice; we recommend comparing patients' conditions associated with the above AEs when selecting between these two therapies. PATIENT SUMMARY: Herein, we highlight the differences in adverse events (AEs) between axitinib + pembrolizumab and lenvatinib + pembrolizumab therapies using data from the real-world Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database aimed at patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. We identified AEs that needed attention in each combination. We recommend the differences in AEs to be considered when selecting these two therapies.
尚无头对头的上市后监测研究比较两种联合治疗方案(阿昔替尼[AXI]+帕博利珠单抗[PEMBRO]和仑伐替尼[LEN]+PEMBRO)在转移性肾细胞癌方面不良事件(AE)的差异。本研究旨在根据美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中的真实世界大数据,突出这两种治疗方法之间 AE 的综合差异。从 FAERS 数据库中提取了 28937 条记录,并根据监管活动医学词典将 139 种 AE 分组到系统器官类别中进行分析。进行了逻辑回归分析,并确定了 95%置信区间的报告比值比。我们发现,AXI+PEMBRO 发生心脏和肝胆疾病以及 LEN+PEMBRO 发生血液和淋巴系统、代谢和营养以及血管疾病的发生率更高,这些均与严重 AE 相关,分别高于 LEN+PEMBRO 和 AXI+PEMBRO。AXI+PEMBRO 和 LEN+PEMBRO 之间的 AE 差异不仅仅来自于 AXI 和 LEN 单药治疗。此外,AXI+PEMBRO 还观察到显著的 AE 增强作用。由于 FAERS 是一个包含部分有限信息的自发报告系统,因此在本研究中分析 AE 与患者或治疗特征之间的更详细关系具有挑战性。本研究首次显示了 AXI+PEMBRO 和 LEN+PEMBRO 之间总体真实世界上市后 AE 的差异。我们的新发现将极大地改善临床实践;我们建议在选择这两种治疗方法时比较与上述 AE 相关的患者情况。
在此,我们使用转移性肾细胞癌患者真实世界的美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统数据库中的数据,突出了阿昔替尼+帕博利珠单抗与仑伐替尼+帕博利珠单抗治疗方案之间不良事件(AE)的差异。我们确定了每种联合治疗方案中需要注意的 AE。我们建议在选择这两种治疗方法时考虑 AE 的差异。