Camfield C S, Camfield P R, Finley J
Am J Dis Child. 1987 Jul;141(7):807-10. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1987.04460070109037.
Since the value of home apnea monitoring for subsequent siblings (subsibs) of an infant who died of sudden infant death syndrome is uncertain, we describe an evaluation and monitoring program for subsibs. Eighty subsibs were screened in hospital at an average age of 4.6 weeks. The most valuable investigations included history, physical examination, blood gas tests, and four days on an apnea monitor in hospital. Sleep recordings added no decision-making data. Only 23 infants met one of the following criteria for home apnea monitoring: (1) sleep apnea for more than 15 s (either on sleep recording or recognized by apnea alarm), (2) more than 4.5 episodes of apnea per hour of sleep, (3) periodic breathing greater than 24% of sleep time, or (4) severe parental anxiety. Twenty-two infants were monitored until they were aged 6 months and had spent two months apnea free. Twelve had apnea at home. All of the infants survived. Excessive periodic breathing alone did not seem to be a valid reason for home monitoring. Our screening program is simple, acceptable to families, and useful to select a smaller number of subsibs for home apnea monitoring.
由于家庭呼吸暂停监测对死于婴儿猝死综合征的婴儿的同胞手足(以下简称同胞)的价值尚不确定,我们描述了一项针对同胞的评估和监测计划。80名同胞在医院接受了筛查,平均年龄为4.6周。最有价值的检查包括病史、体格检查、血气检查以及在医院进行4天的呼吸暂停监测。睡眠记录未提供有助于决策的数据。只有23名婴儿符合以下家庭呼吸暂停监测标准之一:(1)睡眠呼吸暂停超过15秒(无论是在睡眠记录中还是由呼吸暂停警报识别),(2)每小时睡眠中呼吸暂停发作超过4.5次,(3)周期性呼吸占睡眠时间超过24%,或(4)父母严重焦虑。22名婴儿接受了监测,直到他们6个月大且有两个月未出现呼吸暂停。12名婴儿在家中出现了呼吸暂停。所有婴儿均存活。仅过度的周期性呼吸似乎并非进行家庭监测的有效理由。我们的筛查计划简单,为家庭所接受,且有助于挑选出数量较少的同胞进行家庭呼吸暂停监测。