• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牛肉质量保证全国牧场主调查:项目参与情况、最佳管理实践以及加入未来可持续发展项目的动机

Beef Quality Assurance national rancher survey: program participation, best management practices, and motivations for joining future sustainability programs.

作者信息

Klopatek S C, Cantwell A M, Roche L, Stackhouse-Lawson K, Oltjen J W

机构信息

Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

Institute for Research in the Social Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.

出版信息

Transl Anim Sci. 2022 Aug 1;6(3):txac094. doi: 10.1093/tas/txac094. eCollection 2022 Jul.

DOI:10.1093/tas/txac094
PMID:35919631
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9341740/
Abstract

Till date, with over 137,000 certified members, the most successful rancher educational program has been the Beef Quality Assurance (BQA) program. The BQA program was established in the mid-1990's to improve animal health and welfare with a primary objective to reduce the incidence of injection site lesions by instructing producers to administer injections in the neck only. The present study investigated the drivers of this success to inform future rancher education programs around agricultural sustainability. An online multistate survey was administered to cattle ranchers in collaboration with state cattlemen's associations to better understand rancher motivations for adopting new practices and to gain insight on current involvement in BQA. In total, the survey consisted of 45 questions and was divided into 3 sections: (1) rancher demographics, (2) BQA participation and current best management practice (BMP) application, and (3) willingness to join new rancher educational programs. Data from 842 respondents are including in this study. Of the survey participants, 70% were currently BQA certified or had been BQA certified at one time, and 30% had never been certified. Ranchers who were BQA certified at any time were less likely to administer injections in areas other than the neck compared to ranchers who were not certified ( 0.05), demonstrating the effectiveness of the BQA program. More than 80% of survey respondents who joined the BQA program stated they believed the BQA program improved animal health and welfare on their operation ( = 617). Among those who had not joined the BQA program, 40% believed BQA practices did not align with their ranching operation, while 38% had not heard of the BQA program ( = 256). The survey indicated that male ranchers, those with more years ranching, those with a larger percent of income coming from ranching, and ranches with larger total acres grazed were more likely to be BQA certified at any time ( 0.05). Finally, ranchers who were BQA certified at any time were more likely to state that joining a rancher sustainability program would be beneficial to their operation. In conclusion, not only did the survey provide valuable insight into BQA program adoption but highlighted how BQA pedagogy and program structure may be a suitable framework for creating future rancher sustainability programs.

摘要

截至目前,拥有超过137,000名认证成员的最成功的牧场主教育项目是牛肉质量保证(BQA)项目。BQA项目于20世纪90年代中期设立,旨在改善动物健康和福利,其主要目标是通过指导生产者仅在颈部进行注射来减少注射部位病变的发生率。本研究调查了这一成功的驱动因素,以为未来围绕农业可持续性的牧场主教育项目提供参考。与州养牛者协会合作,对养牛牧场主进行了一项在线多州调查,以更好地了解牧场主采用新做法的动机,并深入了解他们目前参与BQA的情况。该调查总共包含45个问题,分为三个部分:(1)牧场主人口统计学信息,(2)BQA参与情况及当前最佳管理实践(BMP)应用情况,(3)加入新的牧场主教育项目的意愿。本研究纳入了842名受访者的数据。在参与调查的人中,70%目前已获得BQA认证或曾获得过BQA认证,30%从未获得过认证。与未获得认证的牧场主相比,任何时候获得BQA认证的牧场主在颈部以外部位进行注射的可能性更小(P<0.05),这表明了BQA项目的有效性。加入BQA项目的受访者中,超过80%表示他们认为BQA项目改善了其养殖场的动物健康和福利(n = 617)。在未加入BQA项目的人中,40%认为BQA做法与其牧场经营不符,而38%从未听说过BQA项目(n = 256)。调查表明,男性牧场主、从事牧场经营年限更长的人、收入中来自牧场经营的比例更高的人以及放牧总面积更大的牧场,在任何时候获得BQA认证的可能性更大(P<0.05)。最后,任何时候获得BQA认证的牧场主更有可能表示加入牧场主可持续性项目对其经营有益。总之,该调查不仅为BQA项目的采用提供了有价值的见解,还突出了BQA教学法和项目结构如何可能成为创建未来牧场主可持续性项目的合适框架。

相似文献

1
Beef Quality Assurance national rancher survey: program participation, best management practices, and motivations for joining future sustainability programs.牛肉质量保证全国牧场主调查:项目参与情况、最佳管理实践以及加入未来可持续发展项目的动机
Transl Anim Sci. 2022 Aug 1;6(3):txac094. doi: 10.1093/tas/txac094. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
Survey of cow-calf producer perspectives on management strategies and industry challenges. Part 1: handling practices, and health and industry challenges.奶牛犊生产者对管理策略和行业挑战的看法调查。第1部分:处理方式、健康及行业挑战。
Transl Anim Sci. 2018 Dec 17;3(1):195-203. doi: 10.1093/tas/txy138. eCollection 2019 Jan.
3
Dairy cow handling facilities and the perception of Beef Quality Assurance on Colorado dairies.奶牛处理设施以及科罗拉多州奶牛场对牛肉质量保证的认知
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Feb;97(2):798-804. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7146. Epub 2013 Dec 15.
4
Benchmarking animal handling outcomes on cow-calf operations and identifying associated factors.评估肉牛繁殖场的动物处理结果并确定相关因素。
Transl Anim Sci. 2022 Aug 1;6(3):txac106. doi: 10.1093/tas/txac106. eCollection 2022 Jul.
5
Beef Quality Assurance education via satellite videoconference.通过卫星视频会议进行牛肉质量保证教育。
J Anim Sci. 1995 Oct;73(10):3182-8. doi: 10.2527/1995.73103182x.
6
Assessment of management and basic beef quality assurance practices on Idaho dairies.爱达荷州奶牛场管理与基本牛肉质量保证措施评估
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Mar;92(3):1265-71. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1194.
7
Beef Quality Assurance in Feedlots.饲养场的牛肉质量保证
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2015 Jul;31(2):269-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2015.03.008.
8
Sex-specific effects of calving season on joint health and biomarkers in Montana ranchers.蒙大拿州牧场主的产犊季节对关节健康和生物标志物的性别特异性影响。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Jan 31;24(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05979-2.
9
Survey of cow-calf producer perspectives on management strategies and industry challenges. Part 2. Marketing and selection decisions.奶牛犊生产者对管理策略和行业挑战的观点调查。第2部分。营销与选择决策。
Transl Anim Sci. 2019 Feb 11;3(1):225-236. doi: 10.1093/tas/txz010. eCollection 2019 Jan.
10
Frequencies and severity of injection-site lesions in muscles from rounds of cow carcasses.牛胴体各轮次肌肉中注射部位损伤的频率和严重程度。
Transl Anim Sci. 2018 Sep 25;3(1):130-134. doi: 10.1093/tas/txy094. eCollection 2019 Jan.

引用本文的文献

1
Survey of Colorado beef producers' perceptions of the Beef Quality Assurance program.科罗拉多州牛肉生产商对牛肉质量保证计划的认知调查。
Transl Anim Sci. 2025 Apr 29;9:txaf057. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaf057. eCollection 2025.
2
Filling the sustainability gap: what beef industry stakeholders can learn from ranchers on new practice adoption, grazing management plans, and sustainability.填补可持续发展差距:牛肉行业利益相关者可从牧场主身上学到的关于采用新做法、放牧管理计划及可持续性的经验。
Transl Anim Sci. 2025 Apr 16;9:txaf045. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaf045. eCollection 2025.
3
A Review of Producer Adoption in the U.S. Beef Industry with Application to Enteric Methane Emission Mitigation Strategies.

本文引用的文献

1
On how environmental stringency influences adoption of best management practices in agriculture.论环境严格程度如何影响农业最佳管理实践的采用。
J Environ Manage. 2008 Sep;88(4):1530-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.07.029. Epub 2007 Sep 11.
美国牛肉行业生产者采用情况综述及其在肠道甲烷排放缓解策略中的应用
Animals (Basel). 2025 Jan 9;15(2):144. doi: 10.3390/ani15020144.
4
National Beef Quality Audit-2022: Transportation, mobility, live cattle, and hide assessments to determine producer-related defects that affect animal welfare and the value of market cows and bulls at processing facilities.2022年国家牛肉质量审计:运输、移动性、活牛及兽皮评估,以确定与生产者相关的缺陷,这些缺陷会影响动物福利以及加工设施中市场母牛和公牛的价值。
Transl Anim Sci. 2024 Mar 11;8:txae033. doi: 10.1093/tas/txae033. eCollection 2024.