• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西一家公立医院接受姑息治疗的晚期癌症患者症状强度和心理幸福感评估:一项横断面研究。

Assessment of symptom intensity and psychological well-being of patients with advanced cancer undergoing palliative care in a Brazilian public hospital: A cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.

Oncology Division, General Hospital, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.

出版信息

Palliat Support Care. 2023 Aug;21(4):651-657. doi: 10.1017/S1478951522000967.

DOI:10.1017/S1478951522000967
PMID:35920303
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The characterization of clinical-emotional aspects of advanced cancer patients is essential for palliative care. To date, there is scarce information regarding the socio-demographic and clinical profiles, as well as the quality of care given to hospitalized patients under this condition, particularly in South American countries. The objectives of this study were to analyze the socio-demographic profile, symptoms (including psychological well-being), and the quality of life of advanced cancer patients admitted to the oncology ward of the General Hospital of the University of Campinas, Brazil.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, patients were invited to fill the selected questionnaires such as Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS). Descriptive analyses were performed, regarding socio-demographic profile, symptoms, level of information over treatment aims, and quality-of-life scores.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients were included, of whom 29 were male and 30 female, with a mean age of 58 years. Overall, 31.9% presented pain at the time of the interview, 52.5% depression, and 76.3% anxiety. The median individual scores for ESAS and POS (and interquartile range) were, respectively, 27 (17-41) and 14 (9-19). Patients with previous knowledge of treatment objectives reported worse depression scores in the ESAS (median 2 vs. 0, 0.02), even when correcting for possible confounders.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

In contrast to current literature, in which pain is a prevalent report, depression and anxiety were more evident in this specific population of hospitalized patients. This framework reflects the need for valuing not only physical but also emotional symptoms to achieve the integrality of care.

摘要

目的

对晚期癌症患者的临床情绪特征进行描述,对于姑息治疗至关重要。迄今为止,有关社会人口学和临床特征,以及在这种情况下住院患者所接受的护理质量的信息,尤其是在南美洲国家,仍然非常有限。本研究的目的是分析巴西坎皮纳斯大学综合医院肿瘤病房住院晚期癌症患者的社会人口学特征、症状(包括心理健康)以及生活质量。

方法

在这项横断面研究中,邀请患者填写所选问卷,如埃德蒙顿症状评估量表(ESAS)和姑息治疗结果量表(POS)。针对社会人口学特征、症状、对治疗目标的信息了解程度以及生活质量评分,进行描述性分析。

结果

共纳入 59 例患者,其中 29 例为男性,30 例为女性,平均年龄为 58 岁。总体而言,31.9%的患者在接受采访时存在疼痛,52.5%的患者存在抑郁,76.3%的患者存在焦虑。ESAS 和 POS 的个体中位数评分(四分位距)分别为 27(17-41)和 14(9-19)。对治疗目标有预先了解的患者在 ESAS 中报告的抑郁评分更差(中位数 2 与 0,P=0.02),即使在纠正可能的混杂因素后也是如此。

结果的意义

与目前的文献相比,疼痛是常见的报告,但在这一特定的住院患者群体中,抑郁和焦虑更为明显。这种情况反映了不仅要重视身体症状,还要重视情绪症状,以实现护理的完整性。

相似文献

1
Assessment of symptom intensity and psychological well-being of patients with advanced cancer undergoing palliative care in a Brazilian public hospital: A cross-sectional study.巴西一家公立医院接受姑息治疗的晚期癌症患者症状强度和心理幸福感评估:一项横断面研究。
Palliat Support Care. 2023 Aug;21(4):651-657. doi: 10.1017/S1478951522000967.
2
Edmonton symptom assessment scale: Italian validation in two palliative care settings.埃德蒙顿症状评估量表:在两种姑息治疗环境中的意大利语验证
Support Care Cancer. 2006 Jan;14(1):30-7. doi: 10.1007/s00520-005-0834-3. Epub 2005 Jun 4.
3
Symptom Expression in Patients with Advanced Cancer Admitted to an Acute Supportive/Palliative Care Unit With and Without Delirium.伴有和不伴有谵妄的晚期癌症患者入住急性支持/姑息治疗病房的症状表现。
Oncologist. 2019 Jun;24(6):e358-e364. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0244. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
4
Effect of an Oncology Nurse-Led Primary Palliative Care Intervention on Patients With Advanced Cancer: The CONNECT Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.肿瘤专科护士主导的初级姑息治疗干预对晚期癌症患者的影响:CONNECT 集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Nov 1;181(11):1451-1460. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.5185.
5
Prevalence and correlates of unmet palliative care needs in dyads of Chinese patients with advanced cancer and their informal caregivers: a cross-sectional survey.中文标题:中国晚期癌症患者及其非专业照护者二联体中未满足的姑息治疗需求的流行情况及其相关因素:一项横断面调查。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Mar;29(3):1683-1698. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05657-w. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
6
Telephone interventions for symptom management in adults with cancer.针对成年癌症患者症状管理的电话干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 2;6(6):CD007568. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007568.pub2.
7
Symptom distress in advanced cancer patients with anxiety and depression in the palliative care setting.姑息治疗环境中伴有焦虑和抑郁的晚期癌症患者的症状困扰
Support Care Cancer. 2009 May;17(5):573-9. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0529-7. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
8
Factors associated with palliative care symptoms in cancer patients in Palestine.与巴勒斯坦癌症患者姑息治疗症状相关的因素。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 27;13(1):16190. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43469-0.
9
Symptom hyper-expression in advanced cancer patients with anxiety and depression admitted to an acute supportive/palliative care unit.焦虑和抑郁的晚期癌症患者入住急性支持/姑息治疗病房后的症状过度表达。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Aug;27(8):3081-3088. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4624-0. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
10
Intensity of Symptoms and Perception of Quality of Life on Admission to Palliative Care: Reality of a Portuguese Team.姑息治疗入院时的症状强度与生活质量感知:一支葡萄牙团队的实际情况
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 1;12(15):1529. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12151529.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Emotional Distress in Oncology Palliative Patients: Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) and Palliative Outcome Scale (POS)-A Portuguese Cross-Sectional Study.肿瘤姑息治疗患者的情绪困扰评估:埃德蒙顿症状评估系统(ESAS)和姑息治疗结果量表(POS)——一项葡萄牙横断面研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 19;16(24):4232. doi: 10.3390/cancers16244232.