• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

标准右动脉优先入路在腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术治疗壶腹周围肿瘤中的应用:技术要点和围手术期结果。

Standardized right artery first approach during laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms: technical aspects and perioperative outcomes.

机构信息

Division of Oncologic and Mini-Invasive General Surgery, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Dell'Ospedale Maggiore, 3, 20162, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2023 Jan;37(1):759-765. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09494-2. Epub 2022 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-022-09494-2
PMID:35920908
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The most debated aspects of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) concern the dissection of the pancreas from the surrounding vessels and the achievement of adequate resection margins, especially in patients with pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Data of consecutive patients undergoing LPD with right artery first approach from September 2020 to September 2021 for periampullary neoplasms (pancreatic, ampullary, duodenal, distal common biliary duct) were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. The overall cohort was divided into two groups: patients affected by pancreatic carcinoma (PC) and patients affected by other periampullary neoplasms (OP). Surgical and postoperative outcomes between PC and OP were compared.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients (15 PC and 16 OP) were selected. No difference was found between PC and OP in terms of baseline characteristics. Median resection time and overall surgical time of the entire cohort were 275 min and 530 min, respectively, without difference between the groups (p = 0.599 and 0.052, respectively). Blood loss was similar between the groups, being 350 ml in PC and 325 ml in OP (p = 0.762). One patient (3.2%) was converted to laparotomy. No difference was found between the groups in terms of pathological outcomes. Median number of retrieved lymph nodes was 17. The majority of the patients (83.9%) received an R0 resection (73.3% and 93.7% in PC and OP, respectively; p = 0.172). Postoperative surgical outcomes did not differ between the groups, excepting for overall complication rate that was higher in the OP group (26.7% vs 68.7% in PC and OP, respectively; p = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

Standardized right artery first approach during LPD was feasible and did not show worse surgical and postoperative outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer as compared to those affected by other periampullary neoplasms, except for a higher rate of minor complications.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术(LPD)最具争议的方面涉及胰腺与周围血管的分离以及获得足够的切缘,尤其是在胰腺癌患者中。

方法

前瞻性收集 2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 9 月期间接受右动脉优先入路 LPD 的连续患者的数据,并进行回顾性分析。将整个队列分为两组:胰腺癌(PC)患者和其他壶腹周围肿瘤(OP)患者。比较 PC 和 OP 患者的手术和术后结果。

结果

共选择了 31 名患者(15 名 PC 和 16 名 OP)。PC 和 OP 患者的基线特征无差异。整个队列的中位切除时间和总手术时间分别为 275 分钟和 530 分钟,两组之间无差异(p=0.599 和 0.052)。两组之间的出血量相似,分别为 350ml 和 325ml(p=0.762)。1 名患者(3.2%)转为开腹手术。两组之间的病理结果无差异。中位淋巴结检出数为 17 枚。大多数患者(83.9%)获得了 R0 切除(PC 组和 OP 组分别为 73.3%和 93.7%;p=0.172)。两组之间的术后手术结果无差异,但 OP 组的总并发症发生率较高(26.7%与 PC 组和 OP 组的 68.7%;p=0.032)。

结论

在 LPD 中标准化右动脉优先入路是可行的,与其他壶腹周围肿瘤患者相比,该方法在胰腺癌患者中并未显示出更差的手术和术后结果,但轻微并发症发生率较高。

相似文献

1
Standardized right artery first approach during laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms: technical aspects and perioperative outcomes.标准右动脉优先入路在腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术治疗壶腹周围肿瘤中的应用:技术要点和围手术期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jan;37(1):759-765. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09494-2. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
2
Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumors: a multicenter propensity score-matched comparative study.腹腔镜与开放胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺或壶腹周围肿瘤:一项多中心倾向评分匹配的比较研究
Surg Endosc. 2025 May;39(5):3037-3048. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11677-6. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
3
Expanding laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy to pancreatic-head and periampullary malignancy: major findings based on systematic review and meta-analysis.扩大腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰头和壶腹周围恶性肿瘤:基于系统评价和荟萃分析的主要发现
BMC Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul 3;18(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12876-018-0830-y.
4
Oncologic and Perioperative Outcomes Following Selective Application of Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary Malignancies.壶腹周围恶性肿瘤选择性应用腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的肿瘤学及围手术期结局
J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Jul;20(7):1343-9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3136-9. Epub 2016 May 3.
5
Distribution and pathological features of pancreatic, ampullary, biliary and duodenal cancers resected with pancreaticoduodenectomy.胰十二指肠切除术切除的胰腺癌、壶腹癌、胆管癌和十二指肠癌的分布及病理特征
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Feb 28;13:85. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0498-5.
6
Inferoposterior duodenal approach for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的十二指肠后下入路
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb 14;22(6):2142-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i6.2142.
7
Postoperative Bleeding After Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: the Achilles' Heel?腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术后的出血:阿喀琉斯之踵?
World J Surg. 2018 Apr;42(4):1138-1146. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4269-z.
8
Totally laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: A propensity score matching analysis of short-term outcomes.全腹腔镜与开腹胰十二指肠切除术:短期结局的倾向评分匹配分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Mar;47(3 Pt B):674-680. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.10.036. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
9
Indocyanine Green Perfusion Imaging-Guided Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Potential Application in Retroperitoneal Margin Dissection.吲哚菁绿灌注成像引导腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术:在后腹膜切缘解剖中的潜在应用。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Aug;22(8):1470-1474. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3760-7. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
10
Comparing the operative, oncological, post-operative outcomes and complications of robotic and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for the treatment of pancreatic and periampullary cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis with subgroup analysis.比较机器人辅助与腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺和壶腹周围癌的手术、肿瘤学、术后结局及并发症:一项包含亚组分析的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Robot Surg. 2025 Mar 5;19(1):97. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02239-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Artery-First Approach During Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer: Outcomes from a Single Center and Comparison Between Laparoscopic and Robotic Approaches.胰腺癌微创胰十二指肠切除术中的动脉优先入路:单中心结果及腹腔镜与机器人手术入路的比较
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 23;17(13):2103. doi: 10.3390/cancers17132103.
2
Biodegradable internal stent versus no stent for patients at increased risk of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-center propensity score matching analysis.胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘风险增加患者使用可生物降解内支架与不使用支架的比较:单中心倾向评分匹配分析
Updates Surg. 2025 May 26. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02252-8.
3
Oncological Outcomes of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Surgery for Ductal Adenocarcinomas of Pancreatic Head: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
胰头导管腺癌行开放手术与微创手术的肿瘤学结局:倾向评分匹配分析。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Oct 11;31(10):6096-6109. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31100455.
4
A comparative study of the "superior mesenteric artery first" approach versus the conventional approach in short-term and long-term outcomes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.对比研究腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰导管腺癌中采用肠系膜上动脉优先入路与传统入路在短期和长期结局的差异。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9326-9338. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10470-7. Epub 2023 Oct 27.