The George Washington University, Milken Institute School of Public Health, Washington, District of Columbia.
ICF, Rockville, Maryland.
Pediatrics. 2022 Aug 1;150(Suppl 1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-057092H.
Cessation of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) with early introduction of complementary food provides additional calories for catch-up growth but may also increase the risk of adverse outcomes. The objective of this study was to assess effects of exclusive breastfeeding for less than 6 months compared with 6 months in preterm and low birth weight infants.
Data sources include Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Index Medicus through June 30, 2021. Study selection includes randomized trials and observational studies. Primary outcomes were mortality, morbidity, growth, and neurodevelopment. Data were extracted and pooled using random-effects models. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias of included studies.
A total of 2 studies of 307 preterm or low birth weight infants were included. None of the study results could be pooled. Both studies compared EBF for 4 months to 6 months. Growth was similar between the 4-month and 6-month EBF groups for the following outcomes: weight-for-age z-score at corrected age 12 months (mean [standard deviation], 4-month group: -1.7 [1.1], 6-month group: -1.8 [1.2], 1 study, 188 participants, low certainty evidence), absolute weight gain (gram) from 16 to 26 weeks of age (4-month group: 1004 [366], 6-month group: 1017 [350], 1 study, 119 participants, very low certainty evidence), and linear growth gain (cm) from 16 to 26 weeks of age (4-month group: 4.3 [0.9], 6-month group: 4.5 [1.2], 1 study, 119 participants, very low certainty evidence). There were no apparent differences in reported morbidity symptoms. No difference in the timing to achieve motor development milestones between the 2 groups was found (1 study; 119 participants, very low certainty evidence). A limited number of studies prevented data pooling.
The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of exclusive breastfeeding for less than 6 months for preterm and low birth weight infants. Further studies are warranted to better answer this question.
停止纯母乳喂养(EBF)并及早引入补充食品可为追赶生长提供额外的热量,但也可能增加不良结局的风险。本研究的目的是评估与早产儿和低出生体重儿的 6 个月 EBF 相比,少于 6 个月 EBF 的效果。
数据来源包括截至 2021 年 6 月 30 日的 Medline、Scopus、Web of Science、CINAHL 和 Index Medicus。研究选择包括随机试验和观察性研究。主要结局为死亡率、发病率、生长和神经发育。使用随机效应模型提取和汇总数据。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险 2 工具评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。
共有 2 项研究纳入了 307 名早产儿或低出生体重儿。没有一项研究结果可以进行汇总。这两项研究均比较了 4 个月和 6 个月的 EBF。以下结局的 4 个月和 6 个月 EBF 组的生长情况相似:校正年龄 12 个月时体重与年龄比值的 Z 评分(均值[标准差],4 个月组:-1.7[1.1],6 个月组:-1.8[1.2],1 项研究,188 名参与者,低确定性证据),从 16 周到 26 周龄的绝对体重增加(克)(4 个月组:1004[366],6 个月组:1017[350],1 项研究,119 名参与者,极低确定性证据),以及从 16 周到 26 周龄的线性生长增加(厘米)(4 个月组:4.3[0.9],6 个月组:4.5[1.2],1 项研究,119 名参与者,极低确定性证据)。报告的发病率症状无明显差异。在达到运动发育里程碑的时间上,两组之间没有差异(1 项研究;119 名参与者,极低确定性证据)。由于研究数量有限,无法进行数据汇总。
关于早产儿和低出生体重儿少于 6 个月的纯母乳喂养的效果,证据非常不确定。需要进一步的研究来更好地回答这个问题。