• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期启动血栓预防并不会增加创伤性脑损伤多发伤患者颅内血肿进展的风险。

Early start of thromboprophylaxis does not increase risk of intracranial hematoma progression in multiply injured patients with traumatic brain injury.

机构信息

Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Hospital of the Johann Wolfgang Goethe - University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.

出版信息

Brain Inj. 2022 Jul 3;36(8):1046-1052. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2022.2105951. Epub 2022 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1080/02699052.2022.2105951
PMID:35923095
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in severely injured patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a risk during the clinical course. Data on the safety of an early initiation of pharmacological VTE prophylaxis in severely injured patients with concomitant severe TBI is sparse.

METHODS

Admissions to our level-1-trauma center between January 2015 and December 2018 were screened. Patients suffering from severe TBI (Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) of the head ≥3) and at least one further AIS ≥ 3 in any other body region were included. Demographic data, thromboembolic events, and progression of the intracranial hemorrhage were extracted from the patient's charts. According to the first application of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis (VTEp), patients were categorized either to the early, the late (later than 24 h) or the no therapy group.

RESULTS

In 79 patients (early: n = 35, late: n = 29, no therapy: n = 15) the Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 36.7 ± 12.7 points (AIS 4.1 ± 0.8). No differences were found regarding the progression of the intracranial hemorrhage after initiation of the VTE prophylaxis (adj. p = 0.8). The VTE rate was low (n = 1, 1.6%).

CONCLUSION

In severely injured patients with severe TBI, the early administration of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis did not result in a higher rate of intracranial hematoma progression.

摘要

背景

严重创伤性脑损伤(TBI)合并严重损伤的患者在临床过程中存在静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)风险。关于在严重损伤合并严重 TBI 的患者中早期开始药物性 VTE 预防的安全性的数据很少。

方法

筛选了 2015 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间我院 1 级创伤中心的入院患者。纳入标准为患有严重 TBI(头部损伤严重程度评分(AIS)≥3)和至少一个其他身体部位的 AIS≥3。从患者病历中提取人口统计学数据、血栓栓塞事件和颅内出血进展情况。根据药物性血栓预防(VTEp)的首次应用,将患者分为早期、晚期(晚于 24 小时)或无治疗组。

结果

79 例患者(早期:n=35,晚期:n=29,无治疗:n=15)的损伤严重程度评分(ISS)为 36.7±12.7 分(AIS 4.1±0.8)。在开始 VTE 预防后,颅内出血进展方面没有差异(调整后 p=0.8)。VTE 发生率较低(n=1,1.6%)。

结论

在严重损伤合并严重 TBI 的患者中,早期给予药物性血栓预防并未导致颅内血肿进展率增加。

相似文献

1
Early start of thromboprophylaxis does not increase risk of intracranial hematoma progression in multiply injured patients with traumatic brain injury.早期启动血栓预防并不会增加创伤性脑损伤多发伤患者颅内血肿进展的风险。
Brain Inj. 2022 Jul 3;36(8):1046-1052. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2022.2105951. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
2
Early Chemical Thromboprophylaxis Does not Increase the Risk of Intracranial Hematoma Progression in Patients with Isolated Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.早期化学性血栓预防不会增加单纯严重创伤性脑损伤患者颅内血肿进展的风险。
World J Surg. 2019 Nov;43(11):2804-2811. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05072-1.
3
Early VTE prophylaxis in severe traumatic brain injury: A propensity score weighted EAST multicenter study.严重创伤性脑损伤的早期静脉血栓栓塞预防:EAST 多中心倾向评分加权研究。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023 Jul 1;95(1):94-104. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003985. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
4
A Systematic Review of the Risks and Benefits of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Traumatic Brain Injury.颅脑创伤患者静脉血栓栓塞症预防的风险与获益的系统评价
Can J Neurol Sci. 2018 Jul;45(4):432-444. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2017.275. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
5
Chemical venous thromboembolic prophylaxis is safe and effective for patients with traumatic brain injury when started 24 hours after the absence of hemorrhage progression on head CT.对于头部 CT 检查未见出血进展 24 小时后的创伤性脑损伤患者,开始化学静脉血栓栓塞预防是安全有效的。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Aug;73(2):426-30. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31825a758b.
6
Early venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with trauma intracranial hemorrhage: Analysis of the prospective multicenter Consortium of Leaders in Traumatic Thromboembolism study.创伤性颅内出血患者的早期静脉血栓栓塞预防:前瞻性多中心创伤性血栓栓塞领导者联盟研究分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023 Nov 1;95(5):649-656. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004007. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
7
Association of timing and agent for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with severe traumatic brain injury on venous thromboembolism events, mortality, neurosurgical intervention, and discharge disposition.严重创伤性脑损伤患者静脉血栓栓塞预防的时机和药物与静脉血栓栓塞事件、死亡率、神经外科干预以及出院转归的关系。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 Oct 1;97(4):590-603. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004383. Epub 2024 May 15.
8
Propensity weighted analysis of chemical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis agents in isolated severe traumatic brain injury: An EAST sponsored multicenter study.孤立性严重创伤性脑损伤患者中化学性静脉血栓栓塞预防药物的倾向评分分析:一项由东部创伤外科协会资助的多中心研究。
Injury. 2024 Sep;55(9):111523. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111523. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
9
Delayed prophylaxis with unfractionated heparin increases the risk of venous thromboembolic events in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective analysis.延迟使用未分级肝素预防会增加中重度创伤性脑损伤患者发生静脉血栓栓塞事件的风险:一项回顾性分析。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2020;52(1):28-33. doi: 10.5114/ait.2020.93395.
10
Early venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis in combat-related penetrating brain injury.颅脑战创伤相关早期静脉血栓栓塞症的化学预防。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Apr;126(4):1047-1055. doi: 10.3171/2016.4.JNS16101. Epub 2016 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in the Neurocritically Ill Population.神经重症患者的静脉血栓栓塞预防
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 22;14(13):4434. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134434.
2
Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in adults with acute traumatic brain injury: a systematic review.急性创伤性脑损伤成人患者的静脉血栓栓塞预防:一项系统综述
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025 Jun 22;10(2):e001691. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001691. eCollection 2025.