Suppr超能文献

腹壁成形术后非阿片类镇痛及不同疼痛管理方案的优化:一项系统文献综述

Optimizing Nonopioid Analgesia and Different Pain Management Options following Abdominoplasty: A Systematic Literature Review.

作者信息

Mortada Hatan, Barasain Omar, Altamimi Lamees Abdullah, Alzarmah Israa Mohammed, Almenhali Ahmed Abdullah, Neel Omar Fouda

机构信息

Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Plastic Surgery & Burn Unit, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Jul 22;10(7):e4441. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004441. eCollection 2022 Jul.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative pain remains a significant challenge with the growing number of abdominoplasties every year. Opioids are currently considered the mainstay modality for controlling postoperative pain. However, opioid-related side effects raise the need for a safer and more effective approach. In this study, we aimed to investigate these alternative evidence-based postoperative pain relief modalities following abdominoplasty.

METHODS

This systematic review was designed and conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The literature was systematically searched in December 2021 using the following databases: MEDLINE, Cochrane, and EMBASE. The MeSH terms used to aid the search were the following: abdominoplasty, postoperative pain management, postoperative analgesia, pain control, analgesia, and pain.

RESULTS

Reviewing the literature resulted in a total of 851 publications. After implementing our criteria, only 13 articles were included in this study, with 990 patients. A continuous infusion pump was the most commonly used method of analgesia (n = 3), followed by a transversus abdominis plane block (n = 2). The postoperative pain assessment scale was mentioned in nine out of the 13. Compared to controls, all interventions resulted in considerably lower pain levels in all the patients. Patient satisfaction was reported in three studies, and all studies reported higher satisfaction rates than the control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors performed a systematic review of the existing database of high-quality research on pain management after cosmetic abdominoplasty to determine the best pain management options currently available. However, future studies are recommended to assess the optimum dosing and administration methods.

摘要

引言

随着每年腹壁成形术数量的不断增加,术后疼痛仍然是一个重大挑战。目前,阿片类药物被认为是控制术后疼痛的主要方式。然而,与阿片类药物相关的副作用使得需要一种更安全、更有效的方法。在本研究中,我们旨在调查腹壁成形术后这些基于证据的替代性术后疼痛缓解方式。

方法

本系统评价采用系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南进行设计和实施。2021年12月,使用以下数据库对文献进行了系统检索:医学文献数据库(MEDLINE)、考克兰系统评价数据库(Cochrane)和荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)。用于辅助检索的医学主题词如下:腹壁成形术、术后疼痛管理、术后镇痛、疼痛控制、镇痛和疼痛。

结果

回顾文献共得到851篇出版物。在应用我们的标准后,本研究仅纳入了13篇文章,涉及990例患者。持续输注泵是最常用的镇痛方法(n = 3),其次是腹横肌平面阻滞(n = 2)。13篇文章中有9篇提到了术后疼痛评估量表。与对照组相比,所有干预措施均使所有患者的疼痛程度显著降低。三项研究报告了患者满意度,所有研究报告的满意度均高于对照组。

结论

作者对现有的关于美容腹壁成形术后疼痛管理的高质量研究数据库进行了系统评价,以确定目前可用的最佳疼痛管理方案。然而,建议未来的研究评估最佳剂量和给药方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e951/9307297/baaef2ed904b/gox-10-e4441-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验