• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

终止生命维持治疗的决策:泰国家庭照护者的体验。

Decision to Withdraw Life- Sustaining Treatments: The Experience of Thai Family Caregivers.

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Thailand.

Palliative Care Center, 297361Songkhla Hospital, Songkhla, Thailand.

出版信息

Qual Health Res. 2022 Sep;32(11):1732-1746. doi: 10.1177/10497323221116796. Epub 2022 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1177/10497323221116796
PMID:35924339
Abstract

End-of-life decision-making is a complex process and more challenging when decisions are made for others. Little is known about Thai family members' involvement in decision-making to withdraw life-sustaining treatments (LSTs) from loved ones with serious illnesses. This qualitative study explores the experiences of family caregivers in Southern Thailand regarding decisions related to LST withdrawal. In-depth interviews were used to gather data from fifteen primary caregivers, who were involved in LST withdrawal decision-making. Content analysis was applied, and several techniques, such as member-checking and peer debriefing, were used to enhance trustworthiness. Four main themes were identified: facing dilemmas, weighing up options, making a consensual decision, and accepting the reality of life. The findings pointed out the significant roles played by family meetings and early end-of-life discussion in the process of decision-making to withdraw LSTs from loved ones. Further research on communication among patients' family members and health care providers is recommended.

摘要

生命末期决策是一个复杂的过程,当为他人做出决策时,会更加具有挑战性。对于泰国的家庭成员在决定停止为重病亲人提供生命维持治疗(LST)方面的参与情况,人们知之甚少。本定性研究探讨了泰国南部的主要照顾者在与停止生命维持治疗(LST)的决定相关的经验。通过深度访谈,从参与 LST 停止决策的 15 名主要照顾者那里收集了数据。采用内容分析法,并运用成员检查和同行讨论等几种技术来提高可信度。确定了四个主要主题:面临困境、权衡选择、做出共识决策和接受生命现实。研究结果指出,家庭会议和生命末期讨论在停止为亲人提供 LST 的决策过程中起着重要作用。建议进一步研究患者家属和医疗保健提供者之间的沟通。

相似文献

1
Decision to Withdraw Life- Sustaining Treatments: The Experience of Thai Family Caregivers.终止生命维持治疗的决策:泰国家庭照护者的体验。
Qual Health Res. 2022 Sep;32(11):1732-1746. doi: 10.1177/10497323221116796. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
2
Implication of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Act on End-of-Life Care for Korean Terminal Patients.《维持生命治疗决定法》对韩国终末期患者临终关怀的影响。
Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jul;52(3):917-924. doi: 10.4143/crt.2019.740. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
3
Terminally Ill Taiwanese Cancer Patients' and Family Caregivers' Agreement on Patterns of Life-Sustaining Treatment Preferences Is Poor to Fair and Declines Over a Decade: Results From Two Independent Cross-Sectional Studies.晚期台湾癌症患者及其家庭照顾者在维持生命治疗偏好模式上的一致性较差且在十年间呈下降趋势:两项独立横断面研究的结果
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Jul;54(1):35-45.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.02.013. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
4
Family caregivers making life-sustaining treatment decisions: factors associated with role strain and ease.做出维持生命治疗决策的家庭照顾者:与角色压力和轻松程度相关的因素。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2005 Nov;31(11):28-35. doi: 10.3928/0098-9134-20051101-08.
5
Nurses' Experiences and Factors Related to Their Attitudes Regarding Discussions with Patients and Family Members about Do-Not-Resuscitate Decisions and Life-Sustaining Treatment Withdrawal: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study.护士对与患者和家属讨论不复苏决策和生命支持治疗撤回的态度的经验和相关因素:一项基于医院的横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 15;17(2):0. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020557.
6
Issues and implications of the life-sustaining treatment decision act: comparing the data from the survey and clinical data of inpatients at the end-of-life process.《维持生命治疗决策法案的问题与影响:对终末期患者调查数据与临床数据的比较》
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Aug 19;25(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01088-y.
7
Metasynthesis: withdrawing life-sustaining treatments: the experience of family decision-makers.整合分析:撤除维持生命的治疗措施:家庭决策者的经历
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Jan;18(2):163-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02465.x.
8
Preferences and Attitudes Towards Life-Sustaining Treatments of Older Chinese Patients and Their Family Caregivers.老年中国患者及其家庭照顾者对维持生命治疗的偏好和态度。
Clin Interv Aging. 2023 Mar 23;18:467-475. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S395128. eCollection 2023.
9
A Decade of Changes in Family Caregivers' Preferences for Life-Sustaining Treatments for Terminally Ill Cancer Patients at End of Life in the Context of a Family-Oriented Society.在以家庭为导向的社会背景下,临终癌症患者生命末期家庭照顾者对维持生命治疗的偏好变化十年
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 May;51(5):907-915.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.326. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
10
Evolution and Predictors of Patient-Caregiver Concordance on States of Life-Sustaining Treatment Preferences over Terminally Ill Cancer Patients' Last Six Months of Life.终末期癌症患者生命最后六个月中维持生命治疗偏好状态的患者-照护者一致性的演变及其预测因素。
J Palliat Med. 2019 Jan;22(1):25-33. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0307. Epub 2018 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship of intensive care unit nurses' attitudes towards futile treatment with compassion fatigue and turnover intention.重症监护病房护士对无效治疗的态度与同情疲劳和离职意愿的关系。
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 Mar;30(2):e70013. doi: 10.1111/nicc.70013.