血清淀粉样蛋白动态变化对评估病毒性和支原体社区获得性肺炎患者病情及预后的价值
[Value of serum amyloid protein dynamic changes on evaluating condition and prognosis of patients with viral and mycoplasma community-acquired pneumonia].
作者信息
Ma Chunxia, Li Xueli, Gao Xiaofang, He Qiong, Zhuan Bing, Ji Wei, Cai Zhong, Tian Juan, Liu Li, Liu Hui, Wang Ping, Cao Xiangyuan
机构信息
People's Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region (the First Affiliated Hospital of Northwest Universtity for Nationalities), Yinchuan 750002, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China.
Department of Intensive Care Unit, the First Hospital of Yinchuan, Yinchuan 750001, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China.
出版信息
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2022 Jun;34(6):592-596. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210223-00273.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the predictive role of dynamic changes of plasma biomarkers in patients with viral and mycoplasma community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).
METHODS
From January 2020 to June 2020, 141 patients with viral and mycoplasma CAP in People's Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region were enrolled. Pneumonia severity index (PSI) scores [grade I-II (PSI score ≤ 70), grade III (PSI score 71-90) and grade IV-V (PSI score ≥ 91)], serum amyloid A (SAA), hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and white blood cell (WBC) on the 1 day after admission were compared between the different pathogens (viral and mycoplasma) or different disease severity. The change in level of SAA, hs-CRP on the third day (Δ = 1 d-3 d) were compared among different disease outcome groups (patients were divided into improved group, stable group and exacerbation group based on PSI scores or lung CT images on the third day). The change in the level of SAA, hs-CRP on the seventh day (Δ = 1 d-7 d) were compared among different disease prognosis groups (patients were divided into survival group and death group based on 28-day survival data). The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) were drawn to evaluate the value of SAA in the evaluation of disease and prediction prognosis.
RESULTS
The level of SAA in mycoplasma group (43 cases) was significantly higher than that in virus group (98 cases) on the 1 day after admission. There were no significant differences in other plasma biomarkers between the two groups. The more severe the illness, the higher the SAA level on the 1 day after admission. The trends of other plasma biomarkers in the two groups were consistent with SAA. The levels of SAA in the patients with exacerbation of the virus group and mycoplasma group (12 cases, 9 cases) were significantly higher than those of the improved group (57 cases, 26 cases) and the stable group (29 cases, 8 cases). SAA increased gradually in the exacerbation group, decreased gradually in the improved group, and slightly increased in the stable group. ΔSAA were differences among three groups. The change trend of hs-CPR was consistent with SAA. The level of SAA in the death group was higher than that in the survival group on the seventh day. SAA increased in the death group and decreased in survival group with time from hospital admission. There were differences according to ΔSAA between death group and survival group. The change trend of hs-CPR was consistent with SAA. ROC curve showed that the value of SAA was better than hs-CRP in assessing the severity of patients on admission day, and the area under ROC curve (AUC) was respectively 0.777 [95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 0.669-0.886], 0.729 (95%CI was 0.628-0.830). The value of ΔSAA was better than SAA on the third day predicting disease trends, and AUC was respectively 0.979 (95%CI was 0.921-1.000), 0.850 (95%CI was 0.660-1.000). hs-CRP on the third day and Δhs-CRP had no predictive value. Both SAA on the seventh day and ΔSAA have predictive value for prognosis. AUC was respectively 0.954 (95%CI was 0.898-0.993) and 0.890 (95%CI was 0.689-1.000). SAA on the seventh day and ΔSAA were better than hs-CRP on the seventh day. Δhs-CRP have no predictive value.
CONCLUSIONS
SAA is a sensitive and valuable indicator for CAP patients with viruses and mycoplasma. Dynamic monitoring of SAA can evaluate the patient's progression, prognosis, and assist diagnosis and treatment.
目的
探讨血浆生物标志物动态变化在病毒及支原体社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者中的预测作用。
方法
选取2020年1月至2020年6月在宁夏回族自治区人民医院就诊的141例病毒及支原体CAP患者。比较不同病原体(病毒和支原体)或不同疾病严重程度患者入院第1天的肺炎严重程度指数(PSI)评分[Ⅰ - Ⅱ级(PSI评分≤70)、Ⅲ级(PSI评分71 - 90)和Ⅳ - Ⅴ级(PSI评分≥91)]、血清淀粉样蛋白A(SAA)、超敏C反应蛋白(hs - CRP)、降钙素原(PCT)、红细胞沉降率(ESR)及白细胞(WBC)。比较不同疾病转归组(根据第3天的PSI评分或肺部CT图像将患者分为好转组、稳定组和加重组)第3天(Δ = 1 d - 3 d)SAA、hs - CRP水平的变化。比较不同疾病预后组(根据28天生存数据将患者分为生存组和死亡组)第7天(Δ = 1 d - 7 d)SAA、hs - CRP水平的变化。绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)以评估SAA在疾病评估及预后预测中的价值。
结果
入院第1天,支原体组(43例)SAA水平显著高于病毒组(98例)。两组其他血浆生物标志物无显著差异。病情越严重,入院第1天SAA水平越高。两组其他血浆生物标志物变化趋势与SAA一致。病毒组和支原体组病情加重患者(分别为12例、9例)的SAA水平显著高于好转组(分别为57例、26例)和稳定组(分别为29例、8例)。加重组SAA逐渐升高,好转组逐渐降低,稳定组略有升高。三组间ΔSAA有差异。hs - CPR变化趋势与SAA一致。第7天死亡组SAA水平高于生存组。死亡组SAA随入院时间增加,生存组降低。死亡组与生存组间ΔSAA有差异。hs - CPR变化趋势与SAA一致。ROC曲线显示,入院当天SAA评估患者严重程度价值优于hs - CRP,ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.777[95%置信区间(95%CI)为0.669 - 0.886]、0.729(95%CI为0.628 - 0.830)。第3天ΔSAA预测疾病趋势价值优于SAA,AUC分别为0.979(95%CI为0.921 - 1.000)、0.850(95%CI为0.660 - 1.000)。第3天hs - CRP及Δhs - CRP无预测价值。第7天SAA及ΔSAA均对预后有预测价值。AUC分别为0.954(95%CI为0.898 - 0.993)和0.890(95%CI为0.689 - 1.000)。第7天SAA及ΔSAA优于第7天hs - CRP。Δhs - CRP无预测价值。
结论
SAA是病毒及支原体CAP患者敏感且有价值的指标。动态监测SAA可评估患者病情进展、预后,并辅助诊断及治疗。