• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessing the Fit of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators Fitted with an Ear Loop Strap System: A Pilot Study.评估带耳带系统的 N95 过滤式面罩呼吸器的适配性:一项初步研究。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2023 Jan 12;67(1):50-58. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxac051.
2
Comparison of Fit for Sealed and Loose-Fitting Surgical Masks and N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators.密合型与开放型手术口罩和 N95 过滤式防护口罩的适配性比较。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2021 May 3;65(4):463-474. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxaa125.
3
Randomized crossover study comparing quantitative fit tests between Trident™ and 3M™ Aura™ N95/P2 respirators.随机交叉研究比较 Trident™ 和 3M™ Aura™ N95/P2 呼吸器之间的定量贴合测试。
Infect Dis Health. 2022 May;27(2):61-65. doi: 10.1016/j.idh.2021.10.002. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
4
Fit evaluation of NIOSH approved N95 filtering facepiece respirators with various skin protectants: A pilot study.不同皮肤保护器的 NIOSH 批准的 N95 过滤式面罩呼吸器的适合性评估:一项初步研究。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2023 Sep;20(9):365-372. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2023.2226180. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
5
Personalized 3D-printed frames to reduce leak from N95 filtering facepiece respirators: A prospective crossover trial in health care workers.个性化 3D 打印框架可减少 N95 过滤式面罩呼吸器的泄漏:医护人员的前瞻性交叉试验。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2023 Jul;20(7):304-314. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2023.2205471. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
6
The Effect on Fit of Multiple Consecutive Donning and Doffing of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators.N95 过滤式防护口罩多次佩戴和脱卸对贴合度的影响。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2019 Oct 11;63(8):930-936. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxz060.
7
Effect of upper strap downward displacement on n95 filtering facepiece respirator fit factors: a pilot study.上系带向下移位对N95过滤式面罩呼吸器适合因数的影响:一项初步研究。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2014;11(5):338-41. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2013.866716.
8
P2/N95 filtering facepiece respirators: Results of a large-scale quantitative mask fit testing program in Australian health care workers.P2/N95 过滤式面罩呼吸器:澳大利亚医护人员大规模定量口罩适配测试计划的结果。
Am J Infect Control. 2022 May;50(5):509-515. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.12.016. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
9
Protection levels of N95-level respirator substitutes proposed during the COVID-19 pandemic: safety concerns and quantitative evaluation procedures.在 COVID-19 大流行期间提出的 N95 级呼吸器替代品的防护水平:安全问题和定量评估程序。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 2;11(9):e045557. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045557.
10
Total inward leakage measurement of particulates for N95 filtering facepiece respirators--a comparison study.N95 过滤式面罩呼吸器颗粒物质的总向内泄漏测量——一项比较研究。
Ann Occup Hyg. 2014 Mar;58(2):206-16. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/met054. Epub 2013 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Face anthropometry for filtering facepiece respirators: analysis of the association between facial dimensions and respirator fit.人脸测量学在过滤式面罩呼吸器中的应用:面部尺寸与呼吸器贴合度之间关系的分析。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2024 Mar 15;68(3):312-324. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxae005.
2
Innovate and Stockpile: Respiratory Protection for Essential Workers in a Catastrophic Pandemic.创新与储备:灾难性大流行中 essential workers(此处可能有误,可结合上下文确定准确意思,暂直译为“关键工作者”)的呼吸防护
Health Secur. 2023 Jul-Aug;21(4):266-271. doi: 10.1089/hs.2022.0126. Epub 2023 May 17.
3
Overview of tight fit and infection prevention benefits of respirators (filtering face pieces).呼吸器(过滤式面罩)的紧密贴合和感染预防优势概述。
J Hosp Infect. 2023 Apr;134:89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.01.009. Epub 2023 Feb 3.

评估带耳带系统的 N95 过滤式面罩呼吸器的适配性:一项初步研究。

Assessing the Fit of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators Fitted with an Ear Loop Strap System: A Pilot Study.

机构信息

Center for Health-Related Aerosol Studies, Department of Environmental and Public Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati, 160 Panzeca Way, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA.

Critical Fit Technologies LLC, 1 John Hoft Rd., Tisbury, MA 02568, USA.

出版信息

Ann Work Expo Health. 2023 Jan 12;67(1):50-58. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxac051.

DOI:10.1093/annweh/wxac051
PMID:35924645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9384650/
Abstract

Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, hundreds of millions of people worldwide have become new users of respiratory protective devices. Facemasks and KN95 respirators utilizing an ear loop straps system (ELSS) have recently become popular among occupational and non-occupational populations. Part of this popularity is due to the ease of wearability as compared with traditional devices utilizing two headbands, one worn over the head and the other behind the neck-a universal strap system used in NIOSH-certified N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs). Some users convert the two-strap configuration to an adjustable ELSS. The first objective of this pilot study was to quantitatively characterize how such a conversion impacts the respirator fit. Additionally, a novel faceseal (NFS) technology, which has been previously demonstrated to enhance the fit of N95 FFRs, was deployed to modify the ELSS-converted N95 FFRs. The second objective of this study was to quantify the fit improvement that results from adding the NFS to the ELSS. The study was conducted by performing the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)-approved quantitative fit testing (QNFT) on 16 human subjects featuring different facial shapes and dimensions. Three models of cup-shaped N95 FFRs were tested in three versions: the standard version with manufacturer's strap system, the ELSS-converted, and the ELSS-converted version modified by adding the NFS. QNFT demonstrated that the fit of an N95 FFR featuring the traditional/standard headbands strap system is negatively impacted when this system is converted to an ELSS. The fit of an ELSS-converted respirator can be significantly improved by the addition of the NFS. We found that the FFR model and the strap system version are significant factors affecting the QNFT-determined respirator fit factor (FF), as well as the OSHA QNFT pass rate (FF ≥100). The findings suggest that the current NFS, if further improved, has a potential for developing a 'universally fitting' ELSS-equipped N95 FFR that can be used by the general public, the vast majority of whom do not have access to OSHA fit requirements.

摘要

在整个 COVID-19 大流行期间,数亿人成为呼吸防护设备的新用户。耳带式系统(ELSS)的口罩和 KN95 呼吸器最近在职业和非职业人群中变得流行。这种流行的部分原因是与传统设备相比,它具有佩戴方便的特点,传统设备使用两条头带,一条戴在头上,另一条戴在脖子后面——这是 NIOSH 认证的 N95 过滤式面罩呼吸器(FFR)中使用的通用带系统。一些用户将双带配置转换为可调节的 ELSS。这项初步研究的第一个目标是定量描述这种转换如何影响呼吸器的贴合度。此外,还部署了一种新的面部密封(NFS)技术,该技术已被证明可以增强 N95 FFR 的贴合度,用于修改转换为 ELSS 的 N95 FFR。本研究的第二个目标是量化添加 NFS 到 ELSS 所带来的贴合度改进。这项研究通过对 16 名具有不同面部形状和尺寸的人体受试者进行职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)批准的定量贴合测试(QNFT)来进行。测试了三种杯形 N95 FFR 模型,有三种版本:带有制造商的带系统的标准版本、转换为 ELSS 的版本以及通过添加 NFS 进行修改的 ELSS 转换版本。QNFT 表明,当传统/标准头带带系统转换为 ELSS 时,带有传统/标准头带带系统的 N95 FFR 的贴合度会受到负面影响。通过添加 NFS,可以显著提高 ELSS 转换呼吸器的贴合度。我们发现,FFR 模型和带系统版本是影响 QNFT 确定的呼吸器贴合因子(FF)以及 OSHA QNFT 合格率(FF≥100)的重要因素。研究结果表明,如果进一步改进当前的 NFS,它有可能开发出一种“通用贴合”的配备 ELSS 的 N95 FFR,可供大多数无法获得 OSHA 贴合要求的公众使用。