Suppr超能文献

比较特立帕肽序贯治疗与地舒单抗及地舒单抗单药治疗抑制脆性骨折风险的疗效。

Comparison of the efficacy between sequential therapy with teriparatide and denosumab and denosumab monotherapy in suppressing fragility fracture risk.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, 100 Ilsan-ro, Goyang, 10444, Republic of Korea.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Osteoporos Int. 2022 Nov;33(11):2409-2416. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06495-8. Epub 2022 Aug 4.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

In this retrospective study, the effectiveness of short-term teriparatide with denosumab in reducing fragility fracture risk was determined in comparison with denosumab monotherapy. Administration of sequential teriparatide with denosumab showed excellent outcomes in suppressing the risk for fragility fractures compared with denosumab monotherapy.

INTRODUCTION

To determine the effectiveness of short-term teriparatide with denosumab in reducing the risk of fragility fractures in comparison to denosumab monotherapy.

METHODS

The data of postmenopausal patients treated with denosumab for > 2 years between August 2015 and October 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. One hundred sixty four postmenopausal women of a total 615 were excluded, since they did not undergo > 2 bone mineral density (BMD) tests, were lost to follow-up, or received long-term teriparatide therapy. Total 320 patients received denosumab monotherapy and 131 patients received teriparatide for ≥ 3 months followed by denosumab. The number of osteoporotic fractures, presence of back pain before and after treatment, and annual BMD during treatment were comparatively assessed using t-test, Chi-square test, and linear mixed model analysis.

RESULTS

Before treatment, the denosumab monotherapy group had fewer osteoporotic fractures (mean ± standard deviation; 0.459 ± 0.689) than the sequential therapy group had (1.037 ± 0.871; p < 0.001). After treatment, the sequential therapy group had fewer osteoporotic fractures than the denosumab monotherapy group had (0.119 ± 0.348 versus 0.144 ± 0.385; p < 0.001). At 1 and 2 years after treatment, the increase in lumbar spine BMD was greater in the sequential therapy group than in the denosumab monotherapy group (p = 0.08, group × time). The difference between post and pre-treatment back pain visual analog scale score was significantly lower in the sequential therapy group than in the monotherapy group (3.246 ± 3.426 versus 1.734 ± 3.049; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Short-term teriparatide use before denosumab showed excellent outcomes in suppressing the risk of fragility fractures compared with denosumab monotherapy.

摘要

目的

比较短期甲状旁腺素与地舒单抗联用和地舒单抗单药治疗对降低脆性骨折风险的效果。

方法

回顾性分析 2015 年 8 月至 2020 年 10 月期间接受地舒单抗治疗且随访时间>2 年的绝经后患者的数据。共纳入 615 例患者,其中 164 例因未进行>2 次骨密度(BMD)检查、失访或接受长期甲状旁腺素治疗而被排除。320 例患者接受地舒单抗单药治疗,131 例患者接受甲状旁腺素治疗≥3 个月后再接受地舒单抗治疗。采用 t 检验、卡方检验和线性混合模型分析比较骨质疏松性骨折的数量、治疗前后腰痛的存在情况以及治疗期间的年 BMD。

结果

治疗前,地舒单抗单药组的骨质疏松性骨折(均值±标准差)(0.459±0.689)少于序贯治疗组(1.037±0.871;p<0.001)。治疗后,序贯治疗组的骨质疏松性骨折少于地舒单抗单药组(0.119±0.348 比 0.144±0.385;p<0.001)。治疗后 1 年和 2 年时,序贯治疗组腰椎 BMD 增加幅度大于地舒单抗单药组(p=0.08,组×时间)。序贯治疗组治疗后与治疗前腰痛视觉模拟评分的差值明显小于地舒单抗单药组(3.246±3.426 比 1.734±3.049;p<0.001)。

结论

与地舒单抗单药治疗相比,地舒单抗治疗前短期使用甲状旁腺素可显著降低脆性骨折风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验