Suppr超能文献

电子识别队列中心力衰竭患者错失的医学治疗机会。

Missed opportunities in medical therapy for patients with heart failure in an electronically-identified cohort.

机构信息

Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University School Grossman of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Aug 4;22(1):354. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02734-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

National registries reveal significant gaps in medical therapy for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but may not accurately (or fully) characterize the population eligible for therapy.

OBJECTIVE

We developed an automated, electronic health record-based algorithm to identify HFrEF patients eligible for evidence-based therapy, and extracted treatment data to assess gaps in therapy in a large, diverse health system.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study of all NYU Langone Health outpatients with EF ≤ 40% on echocardiogram and an outpatient visit from 3/1/2019 to 2/29/2020, we assessed prescription of the following therapies: beta-blocker (BB), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB)/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA). Our algorithm accounted for contraindications such as medication allergy, bradycardia, hypotension, renal dysfunction, and hyperkalemia.

RESULTS

We electronically identified 2732 patients meeting inclusion criteria. Among those eligible for each medication class, 84.8% and 79.7% were appropriately prescribed BB and ACE-I/ARB/ARNI, respectively, while only 23.9% and 22.7% were appropriately prescribed MRA and ARNI, respectively. In adjusted models, younger age, cardiology visit and lower EF were associated with increased prescribing of medications. Private insurance and Medicaid were associated with increased prescribing of ARNI (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.02-2.00; and OR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.07-2.67).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed substantial shortfalls in prescribing of MRA and ARNI therapy to ambulatory HFrEF patients. Subspecialty care setting, and Medicaid insurance were associated with higher rates of ARNI prescribing. Further studies are warranted to prospectively evaluate provider- and policy-level interventions to improve prescribing of these evidence-based therapies.

摘要

背景

国家登记处显示,心力衰竭和射血分数降低(HFrEF)患者的医学治疗存在显著差距,但可能无法准确(或完全)描述有资格接受治疗的人群。

目的

我们开发了一种自动化的、基于电子健康记录的算法,以确定有资格接受循证治疗的 HFrEF 患者,并提取治疗数据,以评估在一个大型、多样化的医疗系统中治疗差距。

方法

在这项针对所有 NYU Langone Health 门诊患者的横断面研究中,这些患者在超声心动图上 EF≤40%,并且在 2019 年 3 月 1 日至 2020 年 2 月 29 日期间有一次门诊就诊,我们评估了以下治疗方法的处方:β受体阻滞剂(BB)、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACE-I)/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)/血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂(ARNI)和盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)。我们的算法考虑了药物过敏、心动过缓、低血压、肾功能不全和高钾血症等禁忌症。

结果

我们电子识别出符合纳入标准的 2732 名患者。在符合每种药物类别的患者中,分别有 84.8%和 79.7% 被适当处方了 BB 和 ACE-I/ARB/ARNI,而只有 23.9%和 22.7% 被适当处方了 MRA 和 ARNI。在调整后的模型中,年龄较小、心内科就诊和射血分数较低与药物的开具增加有关。私人保险和医疗补助与 ARNI 的开具增加有关(OR=1.40,95%CI=1.02-2.00;和 OR=1.70,95%CI=1.07-2.67)。

结论

我们观察到门诊 HFrEF 患者 MRA 和 ARNI 治疗的处方存在很大差距。亚专业治疗环境和医疗补助保险与 ARNI 处方的较高比例有关。需要进一步研究来前瞻性评估提供者和政策层面的干预措施,以改善这些循证治疗的处方。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2cd/9354331/a8f9b123da89/12872_2022_2734_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验