Provost G, Lavoie F B, Larbi A, Ng T P, Ying C Tan Tze, Chua M, Fulop T, Cohen A A
Groupe de recherche PRIMUS, Department of Family Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, 3001 12e Ave N, QC, J1H 5N4, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Singapore Immunology Network (SIgN), Agency for Science Technology and Research (A*STAR), Immunos Building, Biopolis, Singapore, Singapore.
Immun Ageing. 2022 Aug 4;19(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12979-022-00291-y.
Traditionally, the immune system is understood to be divided into discrete cell types that are identified via surface markers. While some cell type distinctions are no doubt discrete, others may in fact vary on a continum, and even within discrete types, differences in surface marker abundance could have functional implications. Here we propose a new way of looking at immune data, which is by looking directly at the values of the surface markers without dividing the cells into different subtypes. To assess the merit of this approach, we compared it with manual gating using cytometry data from the Singapore Longitudinal Aging Study (SLAS) database. We used two different neural networks (one for each method) to predict the presence of several health conditions. We found that the model built using raw surface marker abundance outperformed the manual gating one and we were able to identify some markers that contributed more to the predictions. This study is intended as a brief proof-of-concept and was not designed to predict health outcomes in an applied setting; nonetheless, it demonstrates that alternative methods to understand the structure of immune variation hold substantial progress.
传统上,免疫系统被认为是由通过表面标志物识别的离散细胞类型组成。虽然某些细胞类型的区分无疑是离散的,但其他区分实际上可能在一个连续体上变化,甚至在离散类型中,表面标志物丰度的差异也可能具有功能意义。在这里,我们提出了一种看待免疫数据的新方法,即直接查看表面标志物的值,而不将细胞分为不同的亚型。为了评估这种方法的优点,我们将其与使用新加坡纵向衰老研究(SLAS)数据库中的细胞计数数据进行手动门控的方法进行了比较。我们使用了两种不同的神经网络(每种方法一个)来预测几种健康状况的存在。我们发现,使用原始表面标志物丰度构建的模型优于手动门控模型,并且我们能够识别出一些对预测贡献更大的标志物。本研究旨在作为一个简要的概念验证,并非旨在预测应用环境中的健康结果;尽管如此,它表明理解免疫变异结构的替代方法取得了重大进展。