Andrades Evelyn, Clarós Miquel, Torres Juan Vicente, Nonell Lara, González Mónica, Curto-Barredo Laia, Rozas-Muñoz Eduardo, Gimeno Ramon, Barranco Carlos, Pujol Ramon M, Izquierdo Iñaki, Giménez-Arnau Ana M
Department of Dermatology, Hospital del Mar, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona and Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Group of Inflammatory and Neoplastic Dermatological Diseases, Institut Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques, Barcelona, Spain.
Biofactors. 2022 Nov;48(6):1284-1294. doi: 10.1002/biof.1880. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
The objective of the study was to assess the pathogenic and treatment relevance of Platelet Activating factor (PAF) in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). The expression and cellular location of PAF receptor (PAFR) and serum levels of PAF and PAF acetylhydrolase (PAF-AH) in patients with moderate/severe CSU (n = 45) and healthy controls (HCs, n = 17) were studied. Skin samples from the active wheal (LS-CSU, 13 samples for qPCR and 33 for immunohistochemistry) and non-lesional skin (NLS-CSU, 13 samples) of CSU patients and HCs (13 samples and 5 for immunohistochemistry) were analyzed. Serum PAF and PAF-AH levels were measured by ELISA and compared between HC (10 samples) and CSU patients (25 samples) and, among them, between those refractory and non-refractory to second-generation H -antihistamines (sgAH). PAFR mRNA expression was significantly higher in LS-CSU versus HCs (p = 0.014). PAFR positive staining in immunohistochemistry was mainly found in the epidermal basal layer in HCs, whereas it was broadly present along the epidermis in LS-CSU samples. Endothelial cells showed PAFR expression exclusively in LS-CSU and NLS-CSU samples. PAFR expression was observed in the nerves of HC, LS-CSU, and NLS-CSU samples. Double PAFR/CD43 expression showed that T-lymphocytes were the main cell type from the wheal inflammatory infiltrate expressing PAFR. A significantly lower PAF-AH/PAF ratio was observed in sgAH non-responders versus responders (6.1 vs. 12.6; p = 0.049). Our study confirms that PAF is a mediator of wheal pathogenesis in CSU. The significantly lower PAF-AH/PAF ratio in sgAH non-responders vs responders suggests that PAF could be a potential biomarker of sgAH refractoriness.
本研究的目的是评估血小板活化因子(PAF)在慢性自发性荨麻疹(CSU)中的致病性及与治疗的相关性。研究了中度/重度CSU患者(n = 45)和健康对照者(HCs,n = 17)中PAF受体(PAFR)的表达及细胞定位、PAF和PAF乙酰水解酶(PAF-AH)的血清水平。分析了CSU患者和HCs的活动性风团皮肤样本(LS-CSU,13份用于qPCR,33份用于免疫组织化学)及非皮损皮肤样本(NLS-CSU,13份样本),以及HCs的非皮损皮肤样本(13份样本,5份用于免疫组织化学)。通过ELISA测定血清PAF和PAF-AH水平,并在HC(10份样本)和CSU患者(25份样本)之间进行比较,其中还比较了第二代H1抗组胺药(sgAH)治疗无效和有效的患者。与HCs相比,LS-CSU中PAFR mRNA表达显著更高(p = 0.014)。免疫组织化学中PAFR阳性染色在HCs中主要见于表皮基底层,而在LS-CSU样本中沿表皮广泛存在。内皮细胞仅在LS-CSU和NLS-CSU样本中显示PAFR表达。在HC、LS-CSU和NLS-CSU样本的神经中均观察到PAFR表达。PAFR/CD43双重表达显示T淋巴细胞是风团炎症浸润中表达PAFR的主要细胞类型。sgAH治疗无效者与有效者相比,PAF-AH/PAF比值显著更低(6.1对12.6;p = 0.049)。我们的研究证实PAF是CSU风团发病机制的介质。sgAH治疗无效者与有效者相比,PAF-AH/PAF比值显著更低,提示PAF可能是sgAH耐药的潜在生物标志物。