Walker W E, Cooley D A, Duncan J M, Hallman G L, Ott D A, Reul G J
Ann Surg. 1987 Jun;205(6):727-32. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198706000-00015.
Conventional surgical wisdom dictates the complete removal of infected abdominal aortic graft, oversewing of the aorta, and restoration of lower limb bloodflow by extra-anatomic bypass grafting. Dissatisfied with this approach because of the high incidence of local complications, mortality, and loss of limb, 20 patients with secondary aortoduodenal fistula had duodenal repair, excision of the old graft, and placement of a new graft in the same location. A similar technique was used in three patients with erosion of an aortic graft into the jejunum. Length of follow-up averaged 5.2 years, and was more than 1 year in each instance. Of the eighteen patients who survived the repair, three have had early recurrent rupture or false aneurysm of the proximal aortic anastomosis, with consequent death in two, but fifteen patients (83%) have had no further related problem. There was no loss of limb. Use of greater omentum as a protective barrier seemed helpful. Optimal antibiotic usage, and the idea that varying degrees of graft infection require different approaches, require further definition. In conclusion, in situ graft replacement is the correct operative strategy in this challenging group of patients.
传统外科观点认为,应彻底切除感染的腹主动脉移植物,缝合主动脉,并通过解剖外旁路移植术恢复下肢血流。由于局部并发症、死亡率和肢体丧失的发生率较高,20例继发主动脉十二指肠瘘的患者对这种方法不满意,他们接受了十二指肠修复、切除旧移植物并在同一位置植入新移植物。3例主动脉移植物侵蚀空肠的患者也采用了类似技术。随访时间平均为5.2年,每例均超过1年。在接受修复手术存活的18例患者中,3例出现近端主动脉吻合口早期复发性破裂或假性动脉瘤,其中2例死亡,但15例患者(83%)未出现进一步相关问题。没有肢体丧失。使用大网膜作为保护屏障似乎有帮助。最佳抗生素的使用以及不同程度的移植物感染需要不同治疗方法的观点,还需要进一步明确。总之,原位移植物置换是这类具有挑战性的患者正确的手术策略。