Umit Resul
ARENA Centre for European Studies, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Polit Stud Rev. 2022 Aug;20(3):525-533. doi: 10.1177/14789299211044868. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
In the fight against climate change, renewable energy has been subsidised in many countries. With the costs passed onto consumers, governments are paying those, for example, who instal domestic solar panels on top of their homes and feed electricity back into the system at preferential rates. We know that substantial amounts of income flow into households with solar installations as a result, but we do not know much about the political consequences of these programmes. Similar government programmes are known to have resource and interpretative effects on participants, leading to changes in their attitudes. Drawing on three longitudinal surveys from Germany, United Kingdom, and Switzerland, this article analyses whether installation of these solar panels causes meaningful changes in households' various political attitudes. Using fixed-effect models as the identification strategy, the article reports null results - solar installations do not seem to generate political attitudes. This is good as well as bad news for actors looking to increase the amount of renewable energy produced through solar installations.
在应对气候变化的斗争中,许多国家都对可再生能源进行了补贴。随着成本转嫁给消费者,政府向那些在自家房屋顶部安装家用太阳能板并以优惠价格将电力回馈到系统中的人支付费用。我们知道,结果是大量收入流入了装有太阳能设备的家庭,但我们对这些项目的政治后果了解不多。众所周知,类似的政府项目会对参与者产生资源和解释性影响,从而导致他们态度的改变。本文利用来自德国、英国和瑞士的三项纵向调查,分析了这些太阳能板的安装是否会使家庭的各种政治态度发生有意义的变化。本文采用固定效应模型作为识别策略,报告了零结果——太阳能装置似乎不会产生政治态度。对于那些希望通过太阳能装置增加可再生能源产量的行为者来说,这既是好消息也是坏消息。