Suppr超能文献

改良 St. Thomas 停搏液在微创二尖瓣手术中心肌保护效果的影响:一项双中心研究。

Impact of the Cardioplegia Interval on Myocardial Protection Using the Modified St. Thomas Solution in Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery: A Double-Center Study.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Engineering, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Showa University Postgraduate School of Health Sciences, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Extra Corpor Technol. 2022 Jun;54(2):135-141. doi: 10.1182/ject-135-141.

Abstract

It has been reported that a single-dose cardioplegia interval is useful, but the safe interval doses are not clear. We aimed to investigate the impact of the cardioplegia interval on myocardial protection using the modified St. Thomas solution. We included consecutive isolated minimally invasive mitral valvuloplasty procedures ( = 229) performed at a hospital and medical center from January 2014 to December 2020. We compared postoperative peak creatine kinase MB and creatine kinase levels and other indicators between the short (Group S, = 135; maximum myocardial protection interval <60 minutes) and long (Group L, = 94; maximum myocardial protection interval ≥60 minutes) interval groups. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for confounders between the two groups. After propensity score matching, Groups S and L contained 47 patients each. Groups S and L did not differ significantly in peak creatine kinase MB (45.8 ± 26.3 IU/L and 41.5 ± 27.9 IU/L, respectively; = .441) and creatine kinase levels (1,133 ± 567 IU/L and 1,100 ± 916 IU/L, respectively; = .837) after admission to the intensive care unit on the day of surgery based on propensity score matching. In multivariate analysis, a cardioplegia dosing interval ≥60 minutes was not significantly associated with the maximum creatine kinase MB level after admission to the intensive care unit on the day of surgery ( = .354; 95% confidence interval: -1.67 to 4.65). Using the antegrade modified St. Thomas solution, the long interval dose method is useful and safe in minimally invasive mitral valvuloplasty.

摘要

据报道,单次剂量心脏停搏液间隔时间是有用的,但安全间隔剂量尚不清楚。我们旨在使用改良的 St.Thomas 溶液研究心脏停搏液间隔时间对心肌保护的影响。我们纳入了 2014 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月在一家医院和医疗中心连续进行的微创二尖瓣成形术(=229)。我们比较了短(S 组,=135;最大心肌保护间隔<60 分钟)和长(L 组,=94;最大心肌保护间隔≥60 分钟)间隔组之间术后肌酸激酶同工酶 MB 和肌酸激酶水平及其他指标。采用倾向评分匹配来调整两组之间的混杂因素。倾向评分匹配后,S 组和 L 组各包含 47 例患者。S 组和 L 组术后肌酸激酶同工酶 MB 峰值(分别为 45.8±26.3IU/L 和 41.5±27.9IU/L;=0.441)和肌酸激酶水平(分别为 1133±567IU/L 和 1100±916IU/L;=0.837)无显著差异,根据倾向评分匹配,术后当天入住重症监护病房。多变量分析显示,心脏停搏液剂量间隔时间≥60 分钟与术后当天入住重症监护病房时肌酸激酶同工酶 MB 最大水平无显著相关性(=0.354;95%置信区间:-1.67 至 4.65)。在微创二尖瓣成形术中,采用顺行改良的 St.Thomas 溶液,长间隔剂量法是有用且安全的。

相似文献

7
Normokalemic nondepolarizing long-acting blood cardioplegia.正常血钾性非去极化长效血液心脏停搏液
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2017 Sep-Oct;25(7-8):495-501. doi: 10.1177/0218492317736448. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
10
Initial large-dose administration of modified St. Thomas' solution.初始大剂量给予改良圣托马斯溶液。
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2014 Mar;22(3):267-71. doi: 10.1177/0218492313480357. Epub 2013 Sep 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Commentary: Single Dose Cardioplegia: How Long Is Too Long?评论:单次剂量心脏停搏液灌注:多长时间算过长?
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Autumn;32(3):484-485. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.04.009. Epub 2020 May 16.
6
del Nido versus Buckberg cardioplegia in adult isolated valve surgery.del Nido 与 Buckberg 心脏停搏液在成人孤立瓣膜手术中的应用比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Feb;149(2):626-634; discussion 634-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.10.085. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
8
Initial large-dose administration of modified St. Thomas' solution.初始大剂量给予改良圣托马斯溶液。
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2014 Mar;22(3):267-71. doi: 10.1177/0218492313480357. Epub 2013 Sep 4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验