Sattar Tehmina, Ullah Muhammad Imdad, Ahmad Bashir
Department of Sociology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
School of Economics, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 19;13:875174. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.875174. eCollection 2022.
There is a growing body of literature on the predictors of student academic performance. The current study aims to extend this line of inquiry, and has linked stakeholders' participation, goal directness and classroom context with students' academic outcomes. Using the multistage sampling technique, the researchers collected cross-sectional data from 2,758 high school students. This study has employed regression analysis (simple linear regression and hierarchical linear regression modeling) to test the study hypotheses. The results revealed that learning context produces highest variance in students' engagement (R = 59.5%) and their academic performance (R = 42%). It is further evident that goal directness has the highest influence on students' academic performance (Std. β = 0.419) while learning climate of the classroom frequently affects their engagement (Std. β = 0.38) in studies. Results also illustrated that students' overall engagement (R = 99.1%: Model-5 = 0.849) and cognitive induction (R = 79.2%: Model-5 = 0.792) yield highest variance in their academic performance. Although stakeholders' participation causes low variance in students' academic performance but the role of parents, teachers, peers and students (themselves) remained significant. Further, student engagement mediates the direct relationship (s) of independent and outcomes variable. The findings of the present research could be potentially useful for policymakers and schools to ensure the elevation in students' engagement and their academic performance in studies.
关于学生学业成绩预测因素的文献越来越多。本研究旨在扩展这一研究方向,并将利益相关者的参与、目标导向和课堂环境与学生的学业成果联系起来。研究人员采用多阶段抽样技术,收集了2758名高中生的横断面数据。本研究采用回归分析(简单线性回归和分层线性回归模型)来检验研究假设。结果显示,学习环境对学生参与度(R = 59.5%)和学业成绩(R = 42%)的方差影响最大。进一步明显的是,目标导向对学生学业成绩的影响最大(标准β = 0.419),而课堂学习氛围经常影响他们的学习参与度(标准β = 0.38)。结果还表明,学生的总体参与度(R = 99.1%:模型5 = 0.849)和认知诱导(R = 79.2%:模型5 = 0.792)在他们的学业成绩中产生的方差最大。虽然利益相关者的参与对学生学业成绩的方差影响较小,但家长、教师、同伴和学生(他们自己)的作用仍然显著。此外,学生参与度在自变量和结果变量的直接关系中起中介作用。本研究的结果可能对政策制定者和学校有潜在帮助,以确保提高学生的学习参与度和学业成绩。