Suppr超能文献

杂交电视辅助胸腔镜手术与开胸袖状肺叶切除术治疗非小细胞肺癌的疗效及安全性比较:一项倾向评分匹配研究

Comparison of efficacy and safety of hybrid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery . thoracotomy sleeve lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching study.

作者信息

Zhang Chenlei, Ma Yegang, Yu Zhanwu, Zhu Bo, Liu Hongxu

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, China.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2022 Jul;14(7):2635-2644. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-754.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether hybrid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) sleeve lobectomy (SL) could be an alternative to thoracotomy SL for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. The aim of the study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of hybrid VATS SL.

METHODS

We collected 112 patients who received hybrid VATS SL or thoracotomy SL for primary treatment of NSCLC at Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute from November 2016 to September 2021. Perioperative and survival data were collected, and retrospective analysis was conducted on 91 thoracotomy and 21 hybrid VATS SL patients to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two approaches. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize selection bias. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to compare overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Follow-up data were obtained by outpatient clinical visit and nurse-led telephone.

RESULTS

A total of 112 patients were included in this study, including thoracotomy patients (n=91) and hybrid VATS patients (n=21). In the non-match analysis, the baseline data of patients was similar between the two groups, except regarding the receipt of neoadjuvant therapy (P=0.087). After PSM (2:1), a total of 39 thoracotomy patients and 19 hybrid VATS patients were enrolled. The baseline variables were quite similar in both groups. In the hybrid group, the number of lymph nodes (25.9±8.5 32.9±9.7, P<0.01) and positive lymph nodes (3.7±2.9 5.6±4.0, P=0.045) were significantly higher than those in the thoracotomy group. The hybrid group was associated with significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay (9.5±3.5 7.3±2.9, P=0.021) and chest tube duration time (6.6±3.1 5.3±1.5, P=0.031). No statistical difference in complications, reoperation, and recurrence were observed between the hybrid VATS SL and thoracotomy SL (P=1.0, P=1.0, P=0.472). The 30- and 90-day mortalities showed no differences between approaches (2.6% 0%, P=1.0; 5.1% 5.3%, P=1.0). No significant differences were found between thoracotomy and hybrid VATS SL in 3-year OS (P=0.614) and 3-year RFS (P=0.750).

CONCLUSIONS

Hybrid VATS SL lobectomy may be a safe and feasible approach associated with similar oncologic prognosis and better postoperative recovery compared with thoracotomy SL for NSCLC treatment.

摘要

背景

目前尚不清楚混合式电视胸腔镜手术(VATS)袖状肺叶切除术(SL)能否替代开胸SL用于非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的治疗。本研究旨在探讨混合式VATS SL的安全性和有效性。

方法

我们收集了2016年11月至2021年9月在辽宁省肿瘤医院接受混合式VATS SL或开胸SL进行NSCLC初次治疗的112例患者。收集围手术期和生存数据,对91例开胸手术患者和21例混合式VATS SL患者进行回顾性分析,以评估两种手术方式的安全性和有效性。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)以尽量减少选择偏倚。应用Kaplan-Meier法比较总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS)。通过门诊临床随访和护士主导的电话获取随访数据。

结果

本研究共纳入112例患者,包括开胸手术患者(n = 91)和混合式VATS患者(n = 21)。在非匹配分析中,两组患者的基线数据相似,但接受新辅助治疗的情况除外(P = 0.087)。经过PSM(2:1)后,共纳入39例开胸手术患者和19例混合式VATS患者。两组的基线变量非常相似。在混合组中,淋巴结数量(25.9±8.5对32.9±9.7,P < 0.01)和阳性淋巴结数量(3.7±2.9对5.6±4.0,P = 0.045)显著高于开胸组。混合组术后住院时间(9.5±3.5对7.3±2.9,P = 0.021)和胸管留置时间(6.6±3.1对5.3±1.5,P = 0.031)明显更短。混合式VATS SL和开胸SL在并发症、再次手术和复发方面未观察到统计学差异(P = 1.0,P = 1.0,P = 0.472)。两种手术方式的30天和90天死亡率无差异(2.6%对0%,P = 1.0;5.1%对5.3%,P = 1.0)。开胸手术和混合式VATS SL在3年总生存期(P = 0.614)和3年无复发生存期(P = 0.750)方面无显著差异。

结论

对于NSCLC治疗,混合式VATS SL肺叶切除术可能是一种安全可行的方法,与开胸SL相比,肿瘤学预后相似且术后恢复更好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6836/9344417/9ebc3cf95d3f/jtd-14-07-2635-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验