Suppr超能文献

对提交给印度中部一家三级护理教学机构伦理委员会的临床试验协议和保险政策的分析。

Analysis of clinical trial agreement and insurance policy submitted to the ethics committee of a tertiary care teaching institute in central India.

作者信息

Kalikar Mrunalini V, Dakhale Ganesh N, Sinha Vishakha V, Giradkar Akhil B

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

Perspect Clin Res. 2022 Jul-Sep;13(3):151-154. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_124_20. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Very few studies conducted in India have analyzed insurance policies and clinical trial agreement (CTA) submitted to ethics committee (EC). This study was conducted to review and find out deficiencies in it.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study. All the protocols for regulatory clinical trials and academic research sponsored by the Indian Council of Medical Research or other funding agency were included. Insurance documents and CTA submitted with the study protocols were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of seventy CTA and insurance policies were analyzed. CTA mentioned that parties involved in 60 (86%) forms, scope of the agreement in 15 (21%) forms, responsibilities of the party in 68 (97%) forms, and payment details in 58 (83%) forms. Nearly 88.5% of the insurance policies mentioned whether the policy covers the participants for injury due to all clauses and 91% of the policies mentioned the validity period of insurance.

CONCLUSION

It was found that both the documents contained almost all the required elements. This was probably because this institutional EC insisted on and thoroughly reviewed the documents to ensure that adequate compensation of research-related injuries has been provided for and this fact is informed to the trial subject. As very few studies are available in the literature, we could not compare majority of the findings of this study with others.

摘要

目的

在印度开展的研究中,极少有对提交给伦理委员会(EC)的保险政策和临床试验协议(CTA)进行分析的。本研究旨在对此进行审查并找出其中的不足之处。

材料与方法

这是一项回顾性观察研究。纳入了由印度医学研究理事会或其他资助机构赞助的所有监管临床试验和学术研究的方案。对随研究方案提交的保险文件和CTA进行了分析。

结果

共分析了70份CTA和保险政策。CTA中提及参与方的有60份(86%),协议范围的有15份(21%),参与方责任的有68份(97%),支付细节的有58份(83%)。近88.5%的保险政策提及该政策是否涵盖所有条款导致的参与者伤害,91%的政策提及了保险有效期。

结论

发现这两份文件几乎包含了所有必需的要素。这可能是因为该机构伦理委员会坚持并彻底审查了这些文件,以确保为与研究相关的伤害提供了充分补偿,并将这一情况告知试验对象。由于文献中相关研究极少,我们无法将本研究的大部分结果与其他研究进行比较。

相似文献

2
Review of policies for injuries to research participants in India.
J Med Ethics. 2009 Feb;35(2):133-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.025155.
5
Insurance in clinical research.
Perspect Clin Res. 2014 Oct;5(4):145-50. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.140541.
6
Analysis of the compliance of informed consent documents with good clinical practice guideline.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 Sep;32(5):662-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.05.016. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
8
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
9
Analysis of serious adverse events reports: Review by an Institutional Ethics Committee of a tertiary care teaching hospital.
Perspect Clin Res. 2022 Oct-Dec;13(4):189-193. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_293_20. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
10
Payment for participation in clinical research: Review of proposals submitted to the ethics committees.
Perspect Clin Res. 2018 Apr-Jun;9(2):64-69. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_159_16.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical trial agreements and insurance policies - role of the EC.
Perspect Clin Res. 2022 Jul-Sep;13(3):121-122. doi: 10.4103/picr.picr_271_21. Epub 2022 Jun 30.

本文引用的文献

2
Insurance in clinical research.
Perspect Clin Res. 2014 Oct;5(4):145-50. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.140541.
3
Injury and death in clinical trials and compensation: Rule 122 DAB.
Perspect Clin Res. 2013 Oct;4(4):199-203. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.120167.
4
Compensation for research related injury.
Perspect Clin Res. 2013 Jan;4(1):61-9. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.106392.
6
U. S. Health Researchers Review their Ethics Review Boards: A Qualitative Study.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2006 Jun;1(2):39-58. doi: 10.1525/jer.2006.1.2.39.
7
Centralized and non-centralized ethics review: a five nation study.
Account Res. 2006 Jan-Mar;13(1):47-74. doi: 10.1080/08989620600588944.
8
The compensation of patients injured in clinical trials.
J Med Ethics. 1995 Jun;21(3):166-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.3.166.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验