Shoji Monica M, Garcen Magdalena Hartwich, Fernandez Dell'Oca Alberto A, Jupiter Jesse B
Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, British Hospital, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2022 Jun;10(6):501-506. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2021.55486.2764.
The purpose of this case series is to describe surgical decision making and clinical outcomes in posteriorly displaced radial head fractures with a major fragment (more than 50% of the head) located behind the humeral condyle. We also document the outcome of open reduction and internal fixation of completely displaced radial head fractures.
A retrospective review of the ICUC® (Integrated Comprehensive Unchanged Complete) database was performed between 2012 and 2020. Patients were included if preoperative radiographs demonstrated a major radial head fracture fragment located posterior to the humeral condyle and a minimum of 2-year follow-up data was available.
Ten patients met inclusion criteria. Two patients had an associated elbow dislocation whereas 8 patients did not. All patients were found to have disruption of the lateral collateral ligament complex intraoperatively. Nine radial head fractures were successfully fixed with interfragmentary screws. One multi-fragmented radial head fracture could not be successfully stabilized with interfragmentary screw fixation and was resected. The average time to final follow-up was 4.8 years (range 2.2-8.1). At final follow-up, 6 patients demonstrated radiographic evidence of a healed radial head, 1 patient had avascular necrosis, and 2 had post-traumatic arthritis. None demonstrated radiographic instability. The average functional score was 0.64 (SD 0.81) and pain score was 0.45 (SD 0.93). The average elbow extension was 8 degrees (SD 11), elbow flexion was 139 degrees (SD 6), forearm supination was 60 degrees (SD 27), and forearm pronation was 69 degrees (SD 3).
Recognition of a posteriorly displaced radial head fracture is essential, as it may be an indirect sign of elbow instability. This instability should be addressed during surgical intervention.
本病例系列的目的是描述伴有位于肱骨髁后方的主要骨折块(超过头部50%)的桡骨头后脱位骨折的手术决策和临床结果。我们还记录了完全移位的桡骨头骨折切开复位内固定的结果。
对2012年至2020年期间的ICUC®(综合完整未改变)数据库进行回顾性研究。如果术前X线片显示桡骨头主要骨折块位于肱骨髁后方且有至少2年的随访数据,则纳入患者。
10例患者符合纳入标准。2例患者伴有肘关节脱位,8例患者无肘关节脱位。所有患者术中均发现外侧副韧带复合体断裂。9例桡骨头骨折用骨折块间螺钉成功固定。1例粉碎性桡骨头骨折无法用骨折块间螺钉固定成功,予以切除。最终随访的平均时间为4.8年(范围2.2 - 8.1年)。在最终随访时,6例患者有桡骨头愈合的影像学证据,1例有缺血性坏死,2例有创伤后关节炎。均无影像学不稳定表现。平均功能评分为0.64(标准差0.81),疼痛评分为0.45(标准差0.93)。平均肘关节伸展为8度(标准差11),肘关节屈曲为139度(标准差6),前臂旋后为60度(标准差27),前臂旋前为69度(标准差3)。
认识到桡骨头后脱位骨折很重要,因为它可能是肘关节不稳定的间接征象。这种不稳定应在手术干预时予以处理。